Tell Tales: Using Community Partnerships

  • Mellita Jones
  • Karen McLean
Chapter

Abstract

Community-based after-school learning clubs are the focus of this chapter and Chap.  9. This chapter describes how community-based after-school learning clubs can provide innovative, authentic contexts for pre-service teacher literacy education. The tenets of Learner as Central and Communities of Collaboration are discussed in relation to the designing, planning and implementing of the Tell Tales storytelling programme for early years’ literacy learning in after-school learning clubs. The authentic learning context provided through after-school learning clubs is examined in relation to assessment for learning of pre-service teachers’ and children’s learning, and issues pertaining to the sustainability of this personalising learning approach in teacher education are discussed.

References

  1. Aslan, S., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Examining the challenges of learner-centred education. Kappan, 97(4), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
  3. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2013). A step-by-step guide to personalize learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(7), 12.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, M., & Lee, W. (2012). Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Education and Training Victoria [DETV]. (2005). Professional learning in effective schools. Melbourne: DET.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keamy, K., Nicholas, H., Mahar, S., & Herrrick, C. (2007). Personalising education: From research to policy and practice. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
  13. Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940120035532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Land, S., Hannafin, M., & Oliver, K. (2012). Student-centered learning environments: Foundations, assumptions and design. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 3–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, C., & Smagorinsky, P. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (Learning in doing). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands and expectations of self study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Florence: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Maeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLean, K. (2017). Using reflective practice to foster confidence and competence to teach literacy in primary schools. In R. Brandenburg, K. Glasswell, M. Jones, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Reflective theory and practice in teacher education (pp. 119–139). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patrick, C.-j., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., & Pretto, G. (2008). The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: A national scoping study [Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) final report]. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from www.altc.edu.au and www.acen.edu.au
  25. Schwartz, D., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In S. Tobias & T. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 34–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Smit, K., de Brabander, C., & Martens, R. (2014). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environment in pre-vocational secondary education: Psychological needs, and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swennen, A., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2008). Preach what you teach! Teacher educators and congruent teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(5–6), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1794/11736
  31. Winer, Y. (2005). Stories for telling. Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yelland, N., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M., & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking learning in early childhood education. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mellita Jones
    • 1
  • Karen McLean
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations