Advertisement

The Science Teaching in Schools Experience (STISE)

  • Mellita Jones
  • Karen McLean
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter outlines the Science Teaching in Schools Experience (STISE), a school-based approach to science teacher education that profiles, in particular, the application of a Communities of Collaboration and Learner as Central tenets of personalising learning. The context for this example of personalising learning is the teaching of a science education unit within a pre-service teaching Bachelor of Education course for both primary and early childhood and primary teacher candidates at a local university. In these courses, the science teaching self-efficacy levels of the teacher candidates commencing the unit are persistently low. Efforts to address this widespread concern led to an example of situated learning theory forming the basis for the redesign and delivery of the unit. The ways in which Learners as Central and Communities of Collaboration were established and maintained showcase a successful example of personalising learning within science teacher education that addresses traditionally low science teaching self-efficacy beliefs among pre-service teachers.

References

  1. AITSL. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/aligning-teaching-constructing-learning.
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  6. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, L., Bell, R., Manion, L., Martin, S., McCulloch, G., Morrison, K., & O’Sullivan, C. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Léonard, R., & Lowyck, J. (2007). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: What students think. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, B. (2013). Science, mathematics, engineering and technology (STEM) in Australia: Practice, policy and programs. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  12. Goddard, R. (2003). The impact of schools on teacher beliefs, influence and student achievement: The role of collective efficacy beliefs. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 183–202). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, M. (2017). Improving a school-based science education task using critical reflective practice. In R. Brandenburg, K. Glasswell, M. Jones, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Reflective theory and teacher education practice (pp. 179–204). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, M. G., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, M., Hobbs, L., Kenny, J., Campbell, C., Gilbert, A., Herbert, S., & Redman, C. (2016). Successful university-school partnerships: An interpretive framework to inform partnership practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keamy, R. K., Nicholas, H., Mahar, S., & Herrick, C. (2007). Personalising education: From research to policy and practice, Paper No. 11. Office of Education Policy and Innovation. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
  19. Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre-service primary teachers to teach primary science: A partnership approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Land, S., Hannafin, M., & Oliver, K. (2012). Student-centred learning environments: Foundations, assumptions and design. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 3–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Loughran, J. (2010). What expert teachers do. Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together: Primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1309–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer, D. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patrick, C.-J., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., & Pretto, G. (2008). The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: A national scoping study (Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Final Report). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from www.altc.edu.au and www.acen.edu.au
  26. Race, P. (2014). The lecturer’s toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz, D., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In S. Tobias & T. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 34–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Smit, K., de Brabander, C., & Martens, R. (2014). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environment in pre-vocational secondary education: Psychological needs, and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swennen, A., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2008). Preach what you teach! Teacher educators and congruent teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(5–6), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of vice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Australian Education Review 51, Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=aer
  34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mellita Jones
    • 1
  • Karen McLean
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations