High-Strength Linepipe Steels and Physical Simulation of Production Processes

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Linepipe steels have evolved into very sophisticated engineering materials with double the strength of the original 1950s thermomechanically processed API Grade X-52 linepipe. The high demand for linepipe steels resulted in a revolution in rolling practices and steelmaking technologies. Additionally, steel and alloying price fluctuations brought the challenge to produce cost-effective linepipe steel to meet modern specifications. Physical simulation of steel fabrication processes plays an important role in optimizing parameters such as casting, reheating, rolling, and accelerated cooling conditions among others, meeting stringent specifications frequently required in recent pipeline projects. The use of physical simulation has been shown to be an important tool to develop new linepipe steels allowing production cost savings and improved performance.

Keywords

Steels Pipeline Hot rolling Physical modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Brian Allen, Mr. Todd Bonesteel, and Mr. James Papa from DSI for the great support during preparation of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    A.G. Barkow, Columbium Steel in High-Pressure Line Pipe Service, AISI Regional Technical Meeting No. 59, Buffalo, N.Y., (1960)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.B. Pickering and T. Gladman, An Investigation into Some Factors which Control the Strength of Carbon Steels, Metallurgical Developments in Carbon Steels. Harrogate, U.K., ISI Special Report 81, May (1963)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.B.G. Yeo, A.G. Melville, P.E. Repas and J.M. Gray. Properties and Control of Hot-Rolled Steel, Journal of Metals, 20 (1968), 33–43Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Siciliano and J.M. Gray, High Strength Microalloyed Linepipe: Half a Century of Evolution. Pipeline Technology Conference, October 12–14 (2009) Ostend, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Jungnickel, Determination of the deformability behavior of continuous casting shells. MEFORM 2011, (2011), Freiberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Siciliano, B. Allen and D. Ferguson, Hot torsion tests - a reliable rolling simulation method for C-Mn steels. Thermec’16-International Conference on Processing & Manufacturing of Advanced Materials, May/June (2016), Graz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Siciliano, Mathematical Modeling of Hot Rolling: A practical Tool to Improve Rolling Schedules and Steel Properties– (Keynote paper) - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Physical and Numerical Simulation of Materials Processing, June (2013), University of Oulu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Siciliano, Torsion Simulation Method applied to Hot Rolling of Steels. SIMPRO 2016- Thermomechanical Simulation and Processing of Steels Conference, RDCIS-SAIL, (2016), Ranchi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Siciliano, Physical simulation ofhot rolling of C-Mn steels by different deformation methods. ICPNS ‘16 Seattle, (2016), USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DSI-Dynamic Systems Inc.PoestenkillUSA

Personalised recommendations