Educational Testing, Assessment, and Quality Assurance

  • Somwung PitiyanuwatEmail author
  • Samphan Phanphruk
  • Tan Pitiyanuwat
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 42)


The 1999 National Education Act emphasizes the importance of educational testing, assessment, and quality assurance in Thailand. This led to the establishment of two public organizations, namely, the Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (ONESQA) and the National Institute of Educational Testing Service (NIETS) by Royal Decree in 2000 and 2005, respectively. The objective of this chapter is to provide an overview of educational testing and assessment at the national level in Thailand and to examine the roles and achievements of both ONESQA and NIETS. It was found that in the third round of external quality assessment, the certification rates of educational institutions at the basic education, vocational education, and higher education levels were 62.1%, 79.7%, and 97.3%, respectively. The median O-NET scores of students in Grades 6, 9, and 12 were 45.3%, 40.9%, and 35.6%. The students were found to have rather low O-NET scores in the important subject areas of mathematics and English language. Finally, a futures research methodology introduced by the late Professor Robert B. Textor (1980) was used to assess the future of ONESQA and NIETS.


  1. Abeles, Vicki. 2015. Beyond measure: Rescuing an overscheduled, overtested, underestimated generation. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, Paul, et al. 2014. OECD and Pisa tests are damaging education worldwide—academics. The Guardian, May 6.
  3. Association of Institutional Research and Higher Education Development. 2013. Raingan kanpramuenphon damnuenngan khong sathaban thot sob thang kansueksa haeng chat (ongkan mahachon) prachampi pho. so. 2552–2554. Senue sathaban totsob thang kansueksa haeng chat (ongkan mahachon) [Summative assessment report on the work of the National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization), 2009–2011, presented to NIETS (Public Organization)]. Bangkok: AIRHED.Google Scholar
  4. Avery, Miriam L. 2013. IFTF remembers Robert B. Textor, anticipatory anthropologist. Institute for the Future, January 10.Google Scholar
  5. Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
  6. Cano, Elena, and Georgeta Ion, eds. 2017. Innovative practices for higher education assessment and measurement. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  7. Dumrongkiat Mala. 2018. After delays, Onesqa to begin evaluations. Bangkok Post, August 11, p. 3.Google Scholar
  8. Harman, Grant. 2002. Quality assurance initiatives in Thailand. International Higher Education 27: 15–16.Google Scholar
  9. Hean, Bunnith. 2009. Function of ONESQA, personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, James. 2006. School ‘doctors’ make house calls. Bangkok Post, October 31.Google Scholar
  11. Komatsu, Hikaru, and Jerome Rappleye. 2017. A PISA paradox? An alternative theory of learning as a possible solution for variations in PISA scores. Comparative Education Review 61: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministry of Education. 2005. Royal decree establishing the National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). B.E. 2548.2005. Bangkok: Golden Point.Google Scholar
  13. National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (Public Organization). NIETS.
  14. OEC. See Office of the Education Council.Google Scholar
  15. OECD/UNESCA. 2016. Education in Thailand: An OECD-UNESCO perspective, reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). 2009. Raingan kanpramuen ton eng samnakngan rabrongmatrathan pramuen khunaphap kansueksa (ongkan mahachon) [Self-assessment report of the Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization)]. Bangkok: Jud Thong.Google Scholar
  17. Office of National Educational Standards and Quality Assurance. 2009. Raingan pramuen ton eng khong samnakngan rabrong matrathan lae pramuen khunapap (ongkan mahachon) [Self-evaluation report of the Office of National Educational Standards and Quality Assurance (public organization)]. Bangkok: Chutthong.Google Scholar
  18. Office of the Secretary General, Office of the Educational Council, MOE. 2010. Kod krasuang wa duey rabob lakken lae withikan prakan khunapap kansueksa 2553 [Ministry regulations related to the system, principles, and methods for educational quality assurance in 2010]. Rachakitchanubeksa 127, 23 April: 22.Google Scholar
  19. ONEC. 2000. Royal decree establishing the office for national education standards and quality assessment. (Public Organization). B.E. 2543 (2000). Bangkok: Goldern Point.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2001. National Education Act. B.E. 2542 (1999). Bangkok: Prig Wan Graphic.Google Scholar
  21. ONESQA. See Office of National Educational Standards and Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  22. Piyanart Srivaro. 2009. National affairs: Cabinet to decide on pay for executives in public firms. The Nation, May 18, p. 1B.
  23. Schmidt, Frank L and John E. Hunter. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124: 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SEAMEO RIHED. 2012. A study on quality assurance models in Southeast Asian countries: Towards a Southeast Asian quality assurance framework. Bangkok: SEAMEO RIHED.Google Scholar
  25. Somwung Pitayanuwat, et al. 2013. Raingan chabab sombun khrongkan khong “phatanakan khong kantotsob radab chat lae kanprakan khunapap kansueksa radap kansueksa chan phuen than” [Development of national educational testing and quality assurance at the basic education level: Research report]. Project Series: Policies for Raising Thai Human Resource Development in the Asian Era.Financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund.Google Scholar
  26. Somwung Pitiyanuwat. 2007. School assessment in Thailand: Roles and achievement of ONESQA. Educational Research Policy Practice 6: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2009a. The amicable assessment in education quality assurance. International Journal of Quality Assurance and Accreditation.
  28. ———. 2009b. Collaboration in quality assurance between Thailand and the EU. Paper presented at European higher education fair – EHEF 2009, symposium: Thailand-EU cooperation in higher education: Common interests and shared commitments. 30 October. Dusit Thani hotel Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  29. Somwung Pitiyanuwat, and Samphan Phanphruk, eds. 2014. Proceedings of the international symposium on national testing and assessment in ASEAN: Share and learn. The National Institute of Educational Testing Service (public organization). Bangkok: Prigwhan Graphic.Google Scholar
  30. Textor, Robert B. 1980. A handbook on ethnographic futures research. Stanford: Cultural and Futures Research Project, School of Education and Department of Anthropology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  31. Vichit Lorchirachoonkul, et al. 2014. Bantuek kanprachoom khanatamngan kanpathirupkansueksa [Report of the meeting of the working group on education reform]. Bangkok: NIDA, July 24.Google Scholar
  32. Worthen, Molly. 2018. No way to measure students. New York Times, Feburary 25, pp. 1, 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somwung Pitiyanuwat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samphan Phanphruk
    • 2
  • Tan Pitiyanuwat
    • 3
  1. 1.Royal Society of ThailandBangkokThailand
  2. 2.National Institute for Educational Test Service (NIETS)BangkokThailand
  3. 3.Product Design Department, School of Fine and Applied ArtsBangkok UniversityPathumThani ProvinceThailand

Personalised recommendations