Redesigning Teacher Education

  • Pruet SiribanpitakEmail author
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 42)


Teacher education in Thailand is one of the most critical issues in education reform. It has always been the responsibility of government to provide both preservice and in-service teacher education programs. Preservice teacher education programs can be either a 5-year bachelor’s degree in education, or a 1-year graduate diploma in teaching, or a master’s degree in teaching. However, Thailand is now facing a paradox with shortages of teachers at the school level in certain geographic areas and fields, while there is at the same time an oversupply of trained teachers. There are also a lack of fit between teacher preparation and class assignments and the lack of teachers in core areas causing the practice of out-of-field teaching in which teachers trained in one field of study are assigned by school to teacher class in another area of study. There is a need to redesign teacher education to prepare Thai teachers better for the complex challenges of the twenty-first century. A better fit between teacher supply and demand is the most urgent agenda. The retraining and reallocation of out-of-field teachers are the second urgent agenda. The redesign of teacher education programs (both preservice and in-service) is the third urgent agenda. To retain their leading role, Thai teacher education institutes must produce a “new breed of teacher.” These teachers must know their subject matter well and have a passion for teaching it. They must also understand deeply the nature of student-centered, constructivist learning and learning how to be innovator.


  1. Annop Pongwat. 2011. A new breed of teachers: Thailand’s efforts to improve the quality of her teachers. CICE Series 4 (2): 155–166.Google Scholar
  2. Aree Sunhachawee. 1973. A role for the provincial branches of the teacher College of Education. In Education in Thailand: Some Thai perspectives, eds. Amunay Tapingkae and Louis J. Setti, 66–70. Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, education, and welfare.Google Scholar
  3. Atagi, Rie. 2011. Secondary teacher policy research in Asia: Secondary teachers in Thailand. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, Michael, and Mona Mourshed. 2007. How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. New York: McKinsey & Co.
  5. Bhunthin Attagara. 1973. Rural teacher education in Thailand. In Education in Thailand: Some Thai perspectives, ed. Amunay Tapingkae and Louis J. Setti, 62–65. Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, education, and welfare.Google Scholar
  6. Chanita Rukspollmuang. 2005. Raingan kanwichai sapawa kankhat khlaenkhru nai radap kansueksa chan peunthan khong prathet thai [Research report on the conditions of teachers shortages at the compulsory education level in Thailand]. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.Google Scholar
  7. Chu-Chang, Mae Chu, Andrew W. Ragatz, Joppe De Ree, Sheldon Shaeffer, and Ritchie Stevenson. 2014. Teacher reform in Indonesia: The role of politics and evidence in policy making. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Chularat Saengpassa. 2016. Education’s first goal: Quality teachers. The Nation, March 28.Google Scholar
  9. Fry, Gerald W. 1999. Teaching personnel strategy in Thailand: A review and recommendations. Volume II/2. Bangkok: UNESCO (Part of an Asian Development Bank Project).Google Scholar
  10. Fry, Gerald W., and Takehito Kamata. 2018. Buddhist and Confucian thought: A path to teaching excellence. Minneapolis: Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy, and Development.Google Scholar
  11. Ibn Junaid, Muhammad, and Francois Maka. 2015. In service teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis report. The Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  12. Karras, K.G., P. Calogiannakis, C.C. Wolhuter, and D. Kontogianni, eds. 2015. Education and teacher education in the modern world: Problems and challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Keengwe, Jared, and Grace Onchwari. 2017. Handbook of research on learner-centered pedagogy in teacher education and professional development.
  14. Kiatiwan Amatyakul, and Charles O. Jones. 1988. Survey of the implementation of a literacy programme in Thailand. Adult Education in Search of Policy 18 (3): 389–394.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, Julie Thompson. 1996. Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  16. Kline, Stephen J. 1995. Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kowit Varapipatana. 2000. Rian than ratamontri. Kho lo ok chak pen phusongkhunawut khong khanakammakan patirup kansueksa khong krasuangsueksathikan [Mr. Minister, Please allow me to resign as an ex-officio member of the Ministry’s Education Reform Committee]. Letter written from the hospital, October 15.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2017. Archive on Dr. Kowit’s life and accomplishments compiled by Achan Sali Kasemrat, Rajanagarindra Rajabhat University.Google Scholar
  19. Lingard, Bob, Debra Hayes, and Martin Mills. 2003. Teachers and productive pedagogies: Contextualizing, conceptualizing, utilizing. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 11 (3): 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Musset, Pauline. 2010. Initial teacher education and continuing training policies in comparative perspective: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review on potential effects. OECD Working Paper No.48. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  21. Newmann, Fred M., and Associates. 1996. Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Nophakhun Limsamarnphu. 2017. Minister to focus on role of teachers. January 30, The Nation.
  23. OECD. 2005. Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2016. Thailand’s teachers and school leaders. In Education in Thailand: An OECD-UNESCO perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  25. Office of the Education Council. 2015. Study report on the state of teacher production and development in Thailand. Bangkok: OEC.Google Scholar
  26. Ostroff, Wendy L. 2016. Cultivating curiosity in K-12 classrooms: How to promote and sustain deep learning. Alexandria: ACSD. Scholar
  27. Park, Hyunjoon, and Soo-Yong Byun. 2015. Why some countries attract more high-ability young students to teaching: Cross-national comparisons of students expectation of becoming a teacher. Comparative Education Review 59 (3): 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pillay, Hitendra. 2002. Teacher development for quality learning: The Thailand education reform project. Brisbane: Office of Commercial Services, Queensland University of Technology. ADB #3585-THA, Education Sector Review.
  29. Popkewitz, Thomas S. 1998. Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pruet Siribantitak, and Siriporn Boonyananta. 2007. The qualifications of the teaching force in Thailand. In A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations, ed. Robert M. Ingersoll, 85–94. Philadelphia: Consortium for policy research in education (CPRE), University of Pennsylvania. Scholar
  31. Robinson, Sir Ken. 2010. Changing education paradigms. RSA Animate, October.
  32. ———. 2011. Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, Ken, and Lou Aronica. 2009. The element: How finding your passion changes everything. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, Ken, and Lou Aronica. 2015. Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  35. Royal Thai Government Gazette. 1995. Issue 2538, section 4a, 24 January.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2013a. Issue 130, special section 130d, 4 October.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2013b. 130, special section 156d, 12 November.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2014a. Issue 131, special section 46d, 14 March.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2014b. Issue 121, special section 23a, 14 June.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, Terrance M. 2017. Teaching behavior: Managing classrooms through effective teaching. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  41. Somwung Pitayanuwat. 2001. Reform proposals for teaching profession in Thailand. Bangkok: ONEC, Office of the Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  42. Somwung Pitayanuwat, Mayuree Charupan, and Chuanchanok Kowin. 2002. Teachers and teacher education in Thailand. In Teachers and teacher education in southeast Asian countries, ed. Padoongchart Suwanawongse, Praphon Jearakul, Pensri Teeravarapaug, and Susan Adler Shaw, 326–366. Bangkok: SEAMEO.Google Scholar
  43. Stehr, Nico, and Peter Weingart, eds. 2000. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Scholar
  44. Sumlee Thongthew. 2010. Teacher training and teacher education in Thailand. In International handbook on teacher education worldwide, ed. K.G. Karras and C.C. Wolhuter, 535–552. Athens: Atrapos.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2013. In-service teacher training and re-training in Thailand. Bangkok: Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2014. Changes in teacher education in Thailand 1978–2014. Journal of Education for Teaching 40 (5): 543–550.Google Scholar
  47. Suthichai Yoon. 2017. New education minister and his “ICU strategy”. The Nation, January 5.
  48. Thirasak Akrabuan. 2002. Kwampenkhruthai [Self-actualization for Thai teachers]. Phuket: Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Institute Phuket.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationChulalongkorn UniversityPathumwan, BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations