Biotechnology in Forestry



Biotechnological applications in forestry—propagation, genetic transformation, transgenic approaches, in vitro culture, abiotic stress resistance, biotic stress resistance, modification of lignin, RNAi interference, marker-assisted selection and QTL mapping—are discussed in this chapter. The economic benefits resulting from the introduction of forest biotechnology will be reduced costs and increased availability of wood and wood products. Important environmental issues, including rehabilitation of habitats altered by disease and the overuse of natural forests for industrial wood, may also get benefitted from biotechnology solutions.


Biotechnology Forestry Propagation Genetic transformation Transgenesis In vitro culture Abiotic stress resistance Biotic stress resistance Modification of lignin RNAi interference Marker-assisted selection QTL mapping 


  1. Ahuja MR, Libby WJ (eds) (1993) Clonal forestry II: conservation and application. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal N, Dasaradhi PVN, Mohmmed A, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK, Mukherjee SK (2003) RNA interference: biology, mechanism, and applications. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:657–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Souza AJ, Mendes BMJ, de Mourão Filho FAA (2007) Gene silencing: concepts, applications, and perspectives in woody plants. Sci Agric 64(6):645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assis TF, Fett-Neto AG, Alfenas AC (2004) Current techniques and prospects for the clonal propagation of hardwoods with emphasis on Eucalyptus. Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century. Research Signpost, Trivandrum, India, pp 303–333Google Scholar
  5. Bajpai (2015) Paper Industry, 1st edn. Chemicals, Elsevier ScienceGoogle Scholar
  6. Baulcombe D (2000) Unwinding RNA silencing. Science 290:1108–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baucher M, Chabbert B, Pilate G, Doorsselaere JV, Tollier MT, Petit-Conil M, Cornu D, Monties B, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Jouanin L, Boerjan W (1996) Red xylem and higher lignin extractability by down-regulating a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase in poplar. Plant Physiol 112:1479–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson E (2003) Conserving special trees: integrating biotechnological and traditional approaches. Forest biotechnology in Europe: impending barriers, policy and implication. Institute of Forest Biotechnology, Edinburgh, UK, pp 23–24Google Scholar
  9. Brown GR, Gill GP, Kuntz RJ, Langley CH, Neale DB (2004) Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15255–15260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaix G, Monteuuis O (2004) Biotechnology in the forestry sector. Food and Agriculture OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. Davuluri GR, Van Tuinen A, Mustilli AC, Manfredonia A, Newman R, Burgess D, Brummell DA, King SR, Palys J, Uhlig J (2004) Manipulation of DET1 expression in tomato results in photomorphogenic phenotypes caused by post transcriptional gene silencing. Plant J 40:344–354Google Scholar
  12. Diouf D (2003) Genetic transformation of forest trees. Afr J Biotechnol 2:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2004) The State of food and agriculture 2003–2004. Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor? FAO Agriculture Series, No. 35. RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Fillatti JJ, Sellmer J, McCown B, Haissig B, Comai L (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration of Populus. Mol Gen Genet 206:192–199Google Scholar
  15. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallardo F, Fu J, Jing ZP, Kirby EG, Caovas FM (2003) Genetic modification of amino acid metabolism in woody plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gartland KMA, Crow RM, Fenning TM, Gartland JS (2003) Genetically modified trees: production, properties and potential. J Arboric 29(5):259–266Google Scholar
  18. Gill GP, Brown GR, Neale DB (2003) A sequence mutation in the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene associated with altered lignification in loblolly pine. Plant Biotechnol J 1:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein DA, Songstad D, Sachs E, Petrick J (2009) RNA interference in plants. Monsanto.
  20. Guimarães EP, Ruane J, Scherf BD, Sonnino A and Dargie JD (2007) Marker assisted selection: current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 283Google Scholar
  21. Harfouche A, Meilan R, Altman A (2011) Tree genetic engineering and applications to sustainable forestry and biomass production. Trends Biotechnol 29(1):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heilman PE (1999) Planted forests: poplars. New Forest 17:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herschbach C, Kopriva S (2002) Transgenic trees as tools in tree and plant physiology. Trees 16:250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu WJ, Harding SA, Lung J, Popko JL, Ralph J, Stokke DD, Tsai CJ, Chiang VL (1999) Repression of lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose accumulation and growth in transgenic trees. Nat Biotech 17:808–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingvarsson PK (2005) Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium within and among natural populations of European aspen (Populus tremula L. Salicaceae). Genetics 169:945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jia Z, Sun Y, Yuan L, Tian Q, Luo K (2010) The chitinase gene (Bbchit1) from Beauveria bassiana enhances resistance to Cytospora chrysosperma in Populus tomentosa. Carr Biotechnol Lett 32:1325–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar V, Rout S, Takand MK, Deepak KR (2015) Application of biotechnology in forestry: current status and future perspective. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 14(3):645–653Google Scholar
  28. Lapierre C, Pollet B, Petit-Conil M, Toval G, Romero J, Pilate G, Leple JC, Boerjan W, Ferret V, De Nadai V, Jouanin L (1999) Structural alterations of lignins in transgenic poplars with depressed cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase or caffeic acid O-methyltransferase activity have an opposite impact on the efficiency of industrial kraft pulping. Plant Physiol 119:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lev-Yadun S, Sederoff R (2000) Pines as model gymnosperms to study evolution, wood formation and perennial growth. J Plant Growth Regul 19:290–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li M, Ritchie GA (1999) Eight hundred years of clonal forestry in China: I. Traditional afforestation with Chinese fi (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook). New Forest 18:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li J, Brunner AM, Shevchenko O, Meilan R, Ma C, Skinner JS, Strauss SH (2008) Efficient and stable transgene suppression via RNAi in field grown poplars. Transgenic Res 17:679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lloyd A, Plaisier CL, Carroll D, Drews GN (2005) Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-figer nucleases in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2232–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorenz WW, Dean JFD (2002) SAGE profiling and demonstration of differential gene expression along the axial developmental gradient of lignifying xylem in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Tree Physiol 22:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matzke M, Matzke A, Pruss G, Vance V (2001) RNA-based silencing strategies in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merkle SA, Dean JF (2000) Forest tree biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Menzies MI, Aimers-Halliday J (2004) Propagation options for clonal forestry with conifers. Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century, pp 255–274Google Scholar
  37. Neale DB, Kremer A (2011) Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nat Rev Genet 12(1):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neale DB, Savolainen O (2004) Association genetics of complex traits in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 9:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Park YS, Barrett JD, Bonga JM (1998) Application of somatic embryogenesis in high-value clonal forestry: deployment, genetic control, and stability of cryopreserved clones. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34(3):231–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pena L, Seguin A (2001) Recent advances in the genetic transformation of trees. Trend Biotechnol 19:5000–5506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poke FS, Vaillancourt RE, Elliott RC, Reid JB (2003) Sequence variation in two lignin biosynthesis genes, cinnamoyl CoA reductase(CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (CAD2). Mol Breed 12(2):107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plomion C, Leprovost G, Stokes A (2001) Wood formation in trees. Plant Physiol 127:1513–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritchie GA (1991) The commercial use of conifer rooted cuttings in forestry: a world overview. New Forest 5:247–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sedjo RA (2001a) Biotechnology in forestry: considering the costs and benefits. Resources for the Future 145:10–12 Google Scholar
  45. Sedjo RA (2001b) From foraging to cropping: the transition to plantation forestry, and implications for wood supply and demand. Unasylva 52:24–27Google Scholar
  46. Séguin A (1999) Transgenic trees resistant to microbial pests. For Chron 75:303–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaked H, Melamed-Bessudo C, Levy AA (2005) High-frequency gene targeting in Arabidopsis plants expressing the yeast RAD54 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12265–12269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strauss SH, Boerjan W, Cairney J, Campbell M, Dean J, Ellis D, Jouanin L, Sundberg B (1999) Forest biotechnology makes its position known. Nat Biotechnol 17:1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strauss SH, DiFazio SP, Meilan R (2001) Genetically modified poplars in context. Forest Chron 77:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutton WRJ (1999) The need for planted forests and the example of radiata pine. New Forest 17:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang W, Newton RJ, Li C, Charles TM (2007) Enhanced stress tolerance in transgenic pine expressing the pepper CaPF1 gene is associated with the polyamine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep 26:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tenea GN (2009) Exploring the world of RNA interference in plant functional genomics: a research tool for many biology phenomena. Centre of Microbial Biotechnology, pp 4360–4364Google Scholar
  53. Teo G, Suziki Y, Uratsu SL, Lampien B, Ormonde N, Hu WK, Dejong TM, Dandekar AM (2006) Silencing leaf sorbitol synthesis alters long-distance portioning and apple fruit quality. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:18842–18847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Toda R (1974) Vegetative propagation in relation to Japanese forest tree improvement. NZ J Forest Sci 4(2):410–417Google Scholar
  55. Turnbull JW (1999) Eucalypt plantations. New Forest 17:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tzfira T, Zuker A, Altman A (1998) Forest-tree biotechnology: genetic transformation and its application to future forests. Trends Biotechnol 16:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Uyen N (2006) Novel approaches in plants breeding RNAi technology. In: Proceedings of international workshop on biotechnology in agriculture, pp 12–16Google Scholar
  58. Viswanath V, Albrectsen BR, Strauss SH (2011) Global regulatory burden for field testing of genetically modified trees. Tree Genet Genome 8:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wheeler N (2004) A snapshot of the global status and trends in forest biotechnology. FAO, Washington State, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright DA, Townsend JA, Winfrey RJ Jr, Irwin PA, Rajagopal J, Lonosky PM, Hall BD, Jondle MD, Voytas DF (2005) Highfrequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc-figer nucleases. Plant J 44:693–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu X, Kikuchi A, Matsunaga E, Morishita Y, Nanto K, Sakurai N, Suzuki H, Shibata D, Shimada T, Watanabe KN (2009) Establishment of the evaluation system of salt tolerance on transgenic woody plants in the special netted-house. Plant Biotechnol 26:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang Q, Zhang ZY, Lin SZ, Lin YZ (2005) Resistance of transgenic hybrid triploids in Populus tomentosa Carr. against 3 species of lepidopterans following two winter dormancies conferred by high level expression of cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene. Silvae Genet 54(3):108–115Google Scholar
  63. Zhu X, Galili G (2003) Increased lysine synthesis coupled with a knockout of its catabolism synergistically boosts lysine content and also trans regulates the metabolism of other amino acids in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 15:845–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulp and Paper ConsultantKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations