Advertisement

Stickies Control

  • Pratima Bajpai
Chapter

Abstract

Stickie contaminants are a costly problem for both recyclers of market pulp and the papermakers using it. Increased use of pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) has compounded this problem in recycled furnishes. Stickies have a variety of compositions and vary in the type and amount that are found in the different grades of recycled fiber. Stickies can cause runnability and quality problems, and their variable nature makes them difficult to control. Several methods have been proposed for controlling stickies. Chemical methods involve dispersants, polymers and absorbents. Mechanical methods use screens, cleaners, dissolved air flotation, and washing stages. A new approach to stickies control has been developed that uses esterase-type enzymes to break down the stickies into smaller, less tacky particles. The esterase products provide major improvements in the control of troublesome stickies. Enzyme treatment dramatically reduces the size of the sticky particles and modifies their surfaces so they are less tacky and produce less deposition. These enzymes have been proven to reduce downtime, decrease cleaning chemical costs, and increase machine-clothing life better than historical stickies control technologies. A number of case studies explain the effect of using “Optimyze” in mill situations, producing results such as a 90% reduction in stickies and an increase in brightness across the deinking facility, production performance improvements, and a reduction in the use of cleaning solvents and significant reduction in downtime caused by stickies. The Optimyze product line from Buckman is successfully being used in many mills around the world.

Keywords

Stickies Stickies control Contaminants Enzymes Esterases Lipases Pressure sensitive adhesives Runnability Quality problems Screens Cleaners Dissolved air flotation Recycled fiber Primary stickies Secondary stickies Macrostickies Microstickies  

References

  1. Anon (2003a) Buckman: preventing stickies. Pap Making Distrib 2(4):14Google Scholar
  2. Anon (2003b) Buckman: expansion geared towards better serving customers. Pulp Pap Can 104(1):32Google Scholar
  3. Bajpai P (2006) Advances in recycling and deinking (Chap. 1). PIRA International, Leatherhead, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  4. Bajpai P (1997) Enzymes in pulp and paper processing. Miller Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA, p 137Google Scholar
  5. Bajpai P (1999) Application of enzymes in pulp & paper industry. Biotechnol Prog 15(2):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajpai PK (2010) Solving the problems of recycled fiber processing with enzymes. BioResources 5(2):1311–1325Google Scholar
  7. Bajpai P (2013) Recycling and deinking of recovered paper. Elsevier Insights, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Covarrubias RM, Eng GH (2006) Optimyze: enzymatic stickies control developments. Pap Asia 22(8):31–34Google Scholar
  9. Covarrubias RM, Jones DR (2005) Optimyze: enzymatic stickies control developments. In: 91st annual meeting Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–10 Feb 2005, Book A, A107–A116Google Scholar
  10. Delagoutte T, Brun J, Galland G (2003) Drying section deposits: identification of their origin. In: IPE international symposium new technological developments in paper recycling, Valencia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  11. Delagoutte T (2005) Management and control of stickies. Progr Pap Recycl 15(1):31Google Scholar
  12. Doshi MR, Dyer JM (2002) Overview, recent advances in paper recycling—stickies, paper recycling challenge. In: Doshi MR (ed). Doshi, Appleton, p 1Google Scholar
  13. Doshi MR (1999) Properties and control of stickies. In: Doshi MR, Dyer JM (eds) Paper recycling challenge, vol 4. Doshi, Appleton, p 67Google Scholar
  14. Eng GH, Covarrubias RM (2005) Optimyze: enzymatic stickies control developments. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on pulp, paper and conversion industry, New Delhi, India, 3–5 Dec 2005, pp 135–142Google Scholar
  15. Fitzhenry J, Hoekstra PM, Glover D (2000a) Enzymatic stickies control in MOW, OCC, and ONP furnishes. In: Tappi pulping, process and product quality conference, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzhenry J, Hoekstra P, Glover D (2000b) New measurement techniques and new technologies for stickies control. In: Conference on scientific and technical advances in wet end chemistry, Barcelona, Spain, 19–20 June 2000, p 16Google Scholar
  17. Hamann L, Strauss J (2003) Stickies: definitions, causes and control options. Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 131(11/12):65Google Scholar
  18. Johansson H, Wikman B, Lindström E, Österberg F (2003) Detection and evaluation of microstickies. Progr Pap Recycl 12(2):4Google Scholar
  19. Jones DR, Fitzhenry JW (2003) Esterase type enzymes offer recycled mills an alternative approach to stickies control. Pulp Paper Can 28–31Google Scholar
  20. Jones DR (2005) Enzymes: using mother nature’s tools to control man-made stickies. Pulp Paper Can 106(2):23–25Google Scholar
  21. Jones DR (2008) The next steps in enzymatic stickies control. Pulp Pap 82(6):21Google Scholar
  22. Kimura M (2006) Stickies control agent for recycling paper by Optmyze. Jpn TAPPI J 60(7):35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim B, Henrik L, Masaki S, Hiromichi S, Hanne Host P, James William F (2004) Use of lipolytic enzymes for stickies control (PAT—EP1402109 A2)Google Scholar
  24. Lamot J (2004) Effective chemistry for improved recycled fibre quality. In: Eighth Pira international conference on paper recycling technology, Prague 2004Google Scholar
  25. Li Z, Liu C, Qin M, Fu Y, Gao Y (2013) Stickies control with pectinase for improving behavior of cationic polymers in a mixture of chemithermo-mechanical pulp and deinked pulp. BioResources 8(1):189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinney RWJ (ed) (1995) Wastepaper preparation and contaminant removal, technology of paper recycling. Blackie Academic, Glasgow, p 401Google Scholar
  27. Patrick K (2004) Enzyme technology improves efficiency, cost, safety of stickies removal program. Pap Age, 22–26Google Scholar
  28. Patrick K (2006) Stickies still a critical concern for today’s recycling plants. Pap Age 122:28–31Google Scholar
  29. Pei JC, Dun JC, Wang HY, Zhang FD (2013) Clean method for stickies control with StickAway enzyme in ONP pulps. Adv Mater Res 690–693:1426–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Putz H (2000) Stickies in recycled fiberpulp (Chap. 11). In: Gottsching LD, Pakarinen H (eds) Papermaking science and technology, vol 7. Fapet Oy, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  31. Sixta H (ed) (2006) Introduction (Chap. 1). In: Handbook of pulp. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 2–19Google Scholar
  32. Sokol A, Huszar L (2005) Optimyze modern enzymatic programme for stickies control in papermaking process. In: Progress ‘05: 15th international papermaking conference, Warsaw, Poland, 28–30 Sept 2005, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Toland J (2003) Developments in deinking: rounding up some of the latest trends in the recovered paper sector. Pulp Paper Int 45(4):25Google Scholar
  34. Van Haute E (2003) Optimyze: enzymatic stickies control products. Invest Tec Pap 40(149):47–51Google Scholar
  35. Zeng X, Fu S, Yu J, Li K, Zhan H, Li X (2009) Study on the degradation of stickies in the pulps by complex enzymes. China Pulp Pap 28(2):1–4Google Scholar
  36. Zhang Z, Lan D, Zhou P, Li J, Yang B, Wang Y (2017) Control of sticky deposits in wastepaper recycling with thermophilic esterase. Cellulose 24:311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1104-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulp and Paper ConsultantKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations