Advertisement

Fiber Modification

  • Pratima Bajpai
Chapter

Abstract

The use of enzymes in papermaking is becoming an established technology for promoting reduction in refining energy, developing paper characteristics, and enhancing productivity. The carefully selected and formulated enzyme-based products modify fiber to deliver a number of process and product-related advantages. In many cases, the mechanisms and effects are unique and specific to enzymes and which conventional papermaking additives have as yet to deliver. Machines making tissue and fine printing paper grades using bleached pulps and requiring refining have achieved considerable savings in energy consumption, substitution of long fiber by short, and savings in starch use. The cellulase-based products are added to the fiber streams with specific physicochemical conditions ideal for optimum enzyme activity. Studies have also been conducted on packaging board machines using recycled fiber. Trials have shown interesting and commercially viable results. These include increase in production rate and decrease in steam consumption due to better dewatering and increase in post-press solids. Furthermore sheet strength increased and filtrate water quality also improved. Employing xylanase or cellulase to improve the drainage on a pulp or paper machine has been pursued by several mills with the objective to increase the production rate. The presence of endoglucanase activity is a prerequisite for improvement of drainage of recovered paper by enzymatic means. Cellobiohydrolase and Xylanase activity act synergistically with the endoglucanase to improve its effects. Endoglucanases enhance dewatering by hydrolyzing the amorphous hydrophilic cellulose, which is the main constituent of the fines formed during refining. By applying purified enzymes on specific regions of the cellulose fibers, the desired part of the pulp could be modified for a particular enzyme application.

Keywords

Enzymes Refining energy Productivity Cellulase Xylanase Recycled fiber Drainage Endoglucanase Cellobiohydrolase Beatability Refinabilty Fiber modification 

References

  1. Bajpai P, Bajpai PK (2001) Status of biotechnology in pulp and paper industry. In: Paper International, Indian Agro Papermill Association, vol 5(4), July–Dec 2001, p 29Google Scholar
  2. Bajpai PK, Bajpai P, Mishra OP, Mishra SP, Kumar S, Vardhan R (2004) Enzyme’s role in improving papermaking. In: 9th international conference on biotechnology in the pulp & paper industry, Durban, Sappi Forest Products, South Africa, 10–14 Oct 2004, p 1.10Google Scholar
  3. Bajpai P, Bajpai PK, Mishra SP, Mishra OP, Kumar S (2005) Enzymatic refining of pulp—case studies. In: Proceedings of the Paperex 2005 (7th international conference on pulp paper and conversion industry), New Delhi, 3–5 Dec 2005, pp 143–159Google Scholar
  4. Bajpai P, Mishra SP, Mishra OP, Kumar S, Bajpai PK (2006) Use of enzymes for reduction in refining energy—laboratory and process scale studies. Tappi J 5(11):25–32Google Scholar
  5. Barnoud F, Comtat J, Joseleau JP, Mora F, Ruel K (1986) Interest in the enzymatic hydrolysis of xylans for modifying the structure of pulp fibres. In: Proceedings 3rd international conference on biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, Stockholm, Sweden, p 70Google Scholar
  6. Bhardwaj NK, Bajpai P, Bajpai PK (1995) Use of enzymes to improve drainability of secondary fibres. Appita 48(5):378–380Google Scholar
  7. Bhardwaj NK, Bajpai P, Bajpai PK (1996) Use of enzymes in modification of fibers for improved beatability. J Biotechnol 51:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhardwaj NK, Bajpai P, Bajpai PK (1997) Enhancement of strength and drainage of secondary fibers. Appita 50(3):230–232Google Scholar
  9. Bolaski W, Gallatin A, Gallatin JC (1959) Enzymatic conversion of cellulosic fibres. US Patent No. 3,041,246Google Scholar
  10. Cabrera CF, Sarkar JM, Didwania HP, Espinoza E, Benavides JC (1996) Paper mill evaluation of a cellulolytic enzyme and polymers for improving the properties of waste paper pulp. In: Papermaker conference, Tappi Press, Philadelphia, USA, 24–27 Mar 1996, p 481Google Scholar
  11. Chen YM, Wan JQ, Ma YW, Tang B, Han WJ, Ragauskas AJ (2012) Modification of old corrugated container pulp with laccase and laccase-mediator system. Bioresour Technol 110:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Comtat J, Mora F, Noe P (1984) French patent No. 2,557,894Google Scholar
  13. Covarrubias R (2006) Fibre modification through biotechnology. Pulp Pap 80(6)Google Scholar
  14. Covarrubias RM (2007) Enzymatic strength development in OCC. In: 2007 TAPPI 8th research forum on recycling, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 23–26 Sept 2007, 36 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Covarrubias RM (2009) Internal Buckman R&D Newsletter Google Scholar
  16. Covarrubias RM (2010) An Enzymatic solution to vessel picking; PAPTAC 2010Google Scholar
  17. Diehm RA (1942) Process of manufacturing paper. US Pat No. 2,280,307Google Scholar
  18. Eriksson LA, Heitmann JA, Venditti RA (1997) Drainage and strength properties of OCC and ONP using enzymes with refining. In: Recycling symposium, Tappi Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–16 Apr 1997, p 423Google Scholar
  19. Eriksson LA, Heitmann JA Jr, Venditti RA (1998) Freeness improvement of recycled fibres using enzymes with refining, enzymes applications in fiber processing. in: Eriksson KEL (ed) ACS symposium series 687, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, p 340Google Scholar
  20. Freiermuth B, Garrett M, Jokinen O (1994) The use of enzymes in the production of release papers. Paper Technology, Paper Industry Technical Association, vol 35(3), p 21Google Scholar
  21. Fuentes JL, Robert M (1986) French patent 2,604,198Google Scholar
  22. Garcia O, Torres AL, Colom JF, Pastor FIJ, Diaz P, Vidal T (2002) Effect of cellulase-assisted refining on the properties of dried and never-dried eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 9(2):115Google Scholar
  23. Gil N, Gil C, Emila M, Costa AP, Duarte AP (2009) Use of enzymes to improve the refining of a bleached Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulp. Biochem Eng J 46(2):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill R (2008) Advances in use of fibre modification enzymes in paper making. In: Conference Aticelca XXXIX Congresso Annuale, Fabriano, Italy, 29–30 May 2008Google Scholar
  25. Hansen TT, Holm HC, Franks NE (1995) A process for production of linerboard and corrugated medium. Int Pat Appl WO 9509946; 13 Apr 1995Google Scholar
  26. Jackson LS, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW (1993) Enzymatic modifications of secondary fiber. Tappi J 76(3):147–154Google Scholar
  27. Jeffries TW (1992) Emerging technologies for materials and chemicals from biomass. In: Rowell RM, Schultz TP, Narayan R (eds) ACS symposium series No. 476, vol 313Google Scholar
  28. Kallioinen A, Pere J, Siika-Aho M, Lehtila A, Malkki H, Syri S, Thun R (2003) Biotechnical methods for improvement of energy economy in mechanical pulping. Research notes 2183, VTT, Espoo, Finland, p 96Google Scholar
  29. Kantelinen A, Jokinen O (1997) The mechanism of cellulase/hemicellulase treatment for improved drainage. Biological sciences symposium, pp 267–269Google Scholar
  30. Karsila S, Kruss I, Puuppo O (1990) European patent 351655 A 9001249004Google Scholar
  31. Kim HJ, Jo BM, Lee SH (2006) Potential for energy saving in refining of cellulase-treated kraft pulp. J Ind Eng Chem 12(4):578–583Google Scholar
  32. Lecourt M, Meyer V, Sigoillot J-C, Petit-Conil M (2010) Energy reduction of refining cellulases. Holzforschung 64(4):441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li H, Fu S, Peng L (2013) Fiber modification of unbleached kraft pulp with laccase in the presence of ferulic acid. BioResources 8(4):5794–5806Google Scholar
  34. Liu C, Eddeb-Mouelhiac F, Laframboiseab F, Beauregard M (2015) Effect of commercial cellulases and refining on kraft pulp properties: correlations between treatment impacts and enzymatic activity components. Carbohydr Polym 115:193–199Google Scholar
  35. Liu W, Wong B, Hou Q, Chen W, Wu M (2016) Effects of fibrillation on the wood fibers’ enzymatic hydrolysis enhanced by mechanical refining. Biores Technol 206:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loosvelt I (2008) Enzymatic products for the pulp and paper industry. In: Progress 08. 16th international papermaking conference. Efficiency in papermaking and converting processes, Krakow, Poland, 23–26 Sept 2008, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Loosvelt I (2009a) Current applications of fibre modification enzymes in the paper industry and future possibilities. Fibre engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden, 24–26 Mar 2009, 39 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Loosvelt I (2009b) Modifying the quality of fiber with enzymes. PaperAge, 20–22 Sept/OctGoogle Scholar
  39. Lund M, Felby C (2000) Production of paper materials with improved wet strength and use of a phenol-oxidizing enzyme and a mediator therein. Int Pat Appl WO0068500; 16 Nov 2000Google Scholar
  40. Lund M, Felby C (2001) Wet strength improvement of unbleached kraft pulp through laccase catalyzed oxidation. Enzyme Microb Technol 28(9–10):760–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00339-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mansfield SD (2002) Laccase impregnation during mechanical pulp processing—improved refining efficiency and sheet strength. Appita J 55(1):49 (Australian Pulp & Paper Industrial Technical Association)Google Scholar
  42. Mansfield SD, Wong KKY (1999) Improving the physical properties of linerboard via cellulolytic treatment of the recycled paper component. Prog Pap Recycl 9:20–29Google Scholar
  43. Mansfield SD, Jong E, Stephens RS, Saddler JN (1997) Physical characterization of enzymatically modified kraft pulp fibers. J Biotechnol 57:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mansfield SD, Wong KKY, Richardson JD (1999) Improvements in mechanical pulp processing with proteinase treatments. In: 53rd annual Appita conference, Rotorua, New Zealand, vol 2, 19–23 Apr 1999, p 375Google Scholar
  45. Mansfield SD, Wong KKY, Dickson AR (2000) Variation in the response of three different pinus radiata kraft pulps to xylanase treatments. Wood Fiber Sci 32(1):105 (Society of Wood and Science Technology)Google Scholar
  46. Maximino MG, Taleb MC, Adell AM, Formento JC (2011) Application of hydrolytic enzymes and refining on recycled fibers. Cellul Chem Technol 45(5–6):397–403Google Scholar
  47. Michalopoulos DL, Ghosh D, Murdoch B (2005) Enhancement of wood pulps by cellulase treatment. In: 2005 TAPPI Engineering pulping and environment conference PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  48. Mocciutti P, Zanuttini M, Kruus K, Suurnakki A (2008) Improvement of the fibre-bonding capacity of unbleached recycled pulp by the laccase/mediator system. Tappi J 7(10):17–22Google Scholar
  49. Mohandass C, Knutson K, Ragauskas AJ (2008) Laccase treatment of recycled blue dyed paper: physical properties and fibre charge. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(10):1103–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mohlin U-B, Pettersson B (2001) Improved papermaking by cellulase treatment before refining. In: Vahala P, Lantto R (eds) 8th international conference on biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, VTT Biotechnology, Helsinki, Finland, 4–8 June 2001, p 78Google Scholar
  51. Mora F, Comtat J, Barnoud F, Pla F, Noe PJ (1986) Action of xylanases on chemical pulp fibres, 1. Investigation on cell-wall modifications. J Wood Chem Technol 6(2):147Google Scholar
  52. Moran BR (1996) Enzyme treatment improves refining efficiency, recycled fibre freeness. Pulp Pap 70(9):119Google Scholar
  53. Murdoch B (2011) Dyadic international launches high performance enzyme for pulp and paper industry using new C1 production platform (Personal communication)Google Scholar
  54. Noe P, Chevalier J, Mora F, Comtat J (1986) Action of xylanases on chemical pulp fibres, part II—enzymatic beating. J Wood Chem Technol 6:167Google Scholar
  55. Oksanen T, Buchert J, Pere J, Viikari L (1995) In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on biotechnology. Pulp & Paper Industry: Recent Advances in Applied and Fundamental Research, Vienna, Austria, p 177Google Scholar
  56. Oksanen T, Pere J, Buchert J, Viikari L (1997) The effect of Trichoderma reesei cellulases and hemicellulases on the paper technical properties of never-dried bleached kraft pulp. Cellulose 4(4):329Google Scholar
  57. Oksanen T, Pere J, Paavilainen L, Buchert J, Viikari L (2000) Treatment of recycled kraft pulps with Trichoderma reesei hemicellulases and cellulases. J Biotechnol 78:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsen WL, Zhu H, Hubbe MA (2000) Method of improving pulp freeness using cellulase and pectinase enzymes. U.S. patent 6,066,233Google Scholar
  59. Pala H, Mota M, Gama FM (1998) Effects of enzymatic treatment and refining on the properties of recycled pulp. Associacao Portuguesa dos Tecnicos das Industrias de Celulose e Papel, 478Google Scholar
  60. Pastor FIJ, Garcia O, Sanchez M, Vidal T, Torres AL, Diaz P, Colom JF (2002) Cellulase modification of refining properties of dried and never-dried eucalyptus pulp. Cost workshop—biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, Cost E23 Action, Centre Technique du Papier, Poster Session, Grenoble, France, Number 9, 28–29 Nov 2002, p 10Google Scholar
  61. Pere J, Siika-aho M, Viikari L (1994) Process for preparing mechanical pulp. Can Pat No. 2,157,513Google Scholar
  62. Pere J, Siika-aho M, Buchert J, Viikari L (1995) Effects of purified Trichoderma reesei cellulases on the fiber properties of kraft pulp. Tappi J 78:71–78Google Scholar
  63. Pere J, Liukkonen S, Siika-aho M, Gullichsen J, Viikari L (1996) Use of purified enzymes in mechanical pulping. In: Pulping conference, Tappi Press, Nashville, TN, USA, Book 2, 27–31 Oct 1996, p 693Google Scholar
  64. Petit-Conil M, Sigoillot JC, Herpoel I, Kurek B, Ruel K, Moukha S, Joseleau JP, Penninckx M, Asther M, Gazza G, de Choudens C (1998) Treatment of a market poplar high-yield pulp with manganese peroxidases. In: 7th international conference on biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, CPPA, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Volume A, 16–19 June 1998, p A143Google Scholar
  65. Pommier JC, Goma G, Fuentes JL, Rousset C, Jokinen O (1990) Using enzymes to improve the process and the product quality in the recycled paper industry, Part 2: industrial applications. Tappi J 73(12):197–202Google Scholar
  66. Sarkar JM, Cosper DR, Hartig EJ (1995) Applying enzymes and polymers to enhance the freeness of recycled fiber 78(2):89Google Scholar
  67. Scartazzini R, Reinhardt B, Traser G (1995) The use of enzymes as dewatering and refining additives in the paper industry. Allgemeine Papier-Rundschau, P. Keppler Verlag GmbH & Co Kg, vol 119(40), 5 Oct 1995, p 987Google Scholar
  68. Shaikh H, Luo J (2009) Identification, validation and application of a cellulase specifically to improve the runnability of recycled furnishes. In: Proceedings of 9th international technical conference on pulp, paper and allied industry (Paperex 2009), New Delhi, India, 4–6 Dec 2009, pp 277–283Google Scholar
  69. Stork G, Puls J (1995) In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on biotechnology. Pulp & Paper Industry: Recent Advances in Applied and Fundamental Research, Vienna, Austria, p 145Google Scholar
  70. Stork G, Pereira H, Wood TM, Dusterhoft EM, Toft A, Puls J (1995) Upgrading recycled pulps using enzymatic treatment. Tappi J 78(2):79–88Google Scholar
  71. Thomas N, Murdoch B (2006) Speed, production get bio-boost at Liberty Paper: a bio-refining enzyme helps the company run faster and cleaner. Pap.360 vol 1(5), Dec 2006, p 1Google Scholar
  72. Torres AL, Garcia O, Colom JF, Pastor FIJ, Diaz P, Roncero MB, Vidal T (1999) Cellulases-assisted refining of fibres and handsheet properties. In: Crossing the millennium frontier, emerging technical and scientific challenges, 27th EUCEPA conference, Grenoble, France, 11–14 Oct 1999, p 47Google Scholar
  73. Uchimoto I, Endo K, Yamagishi Y (1988) Improvement of deciduous tree pulp. Japanese patent 135, 597/88Google Scholar
  74. Viikari L, Pere J, Suurnakki A, Oksanen T, Buchert J (1998) Carbohydrates from Trichoderma reesei and other microorganisms—structures, biochemistry, genetics and applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, vol 245Google Scholar
  75. Witayakran S, Ragauskas AJ (2009) Modification of high-lignin softwood kraft pulp with laccase and amino acids. Enzyme Microb Technol 44(3):176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wong KKY, Kibblewhite RP, Signal FA (1999a) Effect of xylanase and dosage on the refining properties of unbleached softwood kraft pulp. J Wood Chem Technol 19(3):203Google Scholar
  77. Wong KKY, Anderson KB, Kibblewhite RP (1999b) Effects of the laccase-mediator system on the handsheet properties of two high kappa kraft pulps. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 25:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wong KKY, Richardson JD, Mansfield SD (2000) Enzymic treatment of mechanical pulp fibres for improving papermaking properties. Biotechnol Prog 16:1025–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yamaguchi H, Yaguchi T (1996) Fibre beating with enzyme pretreatment. In: 50th Appita annual general conference, Technical Association of Australia and New Zealand Paper Industry, Auckland, NZ, vol 1, 6–10 May 1996, p 91Google Scholar
  80. Yamaguchi H, Maeda Y, Sakata I (1992) Applications of laccase-induced dehydrogenatively polymerised phenols for bonding of wood fibres. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:931–937Google Scholar
  81. Yamaguchi H, Maeda Y, Sakata I (1994) Bonding among woody fibres by use of enzymic phenol dehydrogenative polymerisation. Mechanism of generation of bonding strength. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 40:185–190Google Scholar
  82. Yerkes WD Jr (1968) Process for the digestion of cellulosic material by enzymatic action of Trametes suaveolens. US patent no. 3,460,089Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulp and Paper ConsultantKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations