Skip to main content

It’s Time to Change the Project Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Enterprise Portfolio Governance

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 1227 Accesses

Abstract

“The problem”, said the CFO of a large financial services organisation, “is that we’re spending a billion dollars a year on projects and I don’t know if we’re getting value for money”. This was something I had heard many times before. He continued, “and I’m not even sure we’re spending it on the right projects”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Australian companies are referenced as these formed the basis for the research under-pinning this book, however organisations and projects in Asia, Europe and North America were also studied, with few differences found between the nature and execution of projects across any region.

  2. 2.

    I will use Australian dollars (AUD), ‘<Footnote ID=”Fn2”><Para ID=”Par27”>I will use Australian dollars (AUD), ‘$’ from this point forward.</Para></Footnote>#x2019; from this point forward.

  3. 3.

    The term ‘silver bullet’ has been used with projects from at least 1979, and it was popularised by Fred Brooks in his paper “No Silver Bullet – Essence and Accident in Software Engineering” published in 1986. It refers to seeking one, all-encompassing solution to what we now refer to as ‘wicked problems’.

  4. 4.

    I will focus on projects and project success here, and in Chap. 3 expand on how success can be defined for programs and portfolios.

  5. 5.

    The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) is a set of frameworks covering a range of architecture components, such as Business, Data, Information, Network.

References

  • Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denrell, J. (2003). Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organization Science, 14, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Framework, D. (2017). The Disciplined Agile (DA) framework [Online]. Available: http://www.disciplinedagiledelivery.com/ [Accessed].

  • Gartner Inc. (2012). Why IT projects fail in government. Stamford: Gartner Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. H., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, J. F., & Fraser, R. (2003). Beyond budgeting: How you can break free from the annual performance trap. HBS: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International. (2017). KPMG’s International 2017 project management survey. Sydney: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2004). Boosting business performance through programme and project management. Woluwedal: Pricewaterhouse Coopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute. (2013). Organizational project management maturity model. Newtown Square: PMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute. (2014). A guide to the program management body of knowledge. Newtown: PMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute. (2016). Pulse of the profession. Newtown Square: PMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWC. (2012). Insights and trends: Current programme and project management practices. Connectedthinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Software, R. (2016). Scaled Agile Framework V4.0 (SAFe) [Online]. Available: http://www.scaledagileframework.com/ [Accessed].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knapp, M. (2018). It’s Time to Change the Project Model. In: Enterprise Portfolio Governance. Management for Professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7838-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics