Advertisement

Reducing Sludge Formation in the Activated Sludge Process

  • M. I.  Nelson
Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics for Industry book series (MFI, volume 28)

Abstract

The activated sludge process was discovered by Ardern and Lockett in the years 1913– 1914. In the slightly more than 100 years since its discovery, it has become the most widely used process for the biological treatment of both domestic and industrial wastewaters in developed and developing countries. At its most basic, the process consists of an aerated reactor basin connected to a settling unit. The effluent stream leaving the reactor enters the settling unit where particulate matter settles under the action of gravity to the bottom of the unit. From here, it can be recycled into the reactor unit. The recycling of particulate matter is the key to improving the efficiency of the process, as enmeshed within it are micro-organisms. This particulate matter is known as sludge and consequently sludge is good. However, too much sludge is bad; disposal of excess sludge can account for between 50 and 60% of the typical operating costs of the activated sludge process.This chapter provides a historical overview of the activated sludge process and two methods for reducing the amount of sludge: disintegration through the use of a sludge disintegration unit and a biological approach based upon the use of predators that graze upon the sludge.

Keywords

Activated sludge process Predation Sludge reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the organizers of the Forum “Math-for-Industry” 2016 for the invitation to give a presentation at the workshop “Agriculture as a metaphor for creativity in all human endeavors” (Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; November 21st–23, 2016).

References

  1. 1.
    E. Ardern, W.T. Lockett, Experiments on the oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 33, 523–539 (1914)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Ardern, W.T. Lockett, The oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters. Part II. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 33, 122–1124 (1914b)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Ardern, W.T. Lockett, The oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters. Part III. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 34, 937–943 (1915)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.P. Canales, J.L. Poles, Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 30, 97–106 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Egemen, J. Corpening, N. Nirmalakhandan, Evaluation of an ozonation system for reduced waste sludge generation. Water Sci. Technol. 44, 445–52 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.J.H. Elissen, E.T.H.M. Peters, B.R. Buys, A. Klapwijk, Population dynamics of free-swimming Annelida in four Dutch wastewater treatment plants in relation to process characteristics. Hydrobiologia 605, 131–142 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Ghyoot, W. Verstraete, Reduced sludge production in a two-stage membrane-assisted bioreactor. Water Res. 34, 205–215 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Heran, C. Wisniewski, J. Orantes, A. Grasmick, Measurement of kinetic parameters in a submerged aerobic membrane bioreactor fed on acetate and operated without biomass discharge. Biochem. Eng. J. 38, 70–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    X. Huang, P. Liang, Y. Qian, Excess sludge reduction induced by Tubifex tubifex in a recycled sludge reactor. J. Biotechnol. 127, 443–451 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Kent, Special Treatment: Australia’s Pioneering Wastewater Plant. Chemistry in Australia. pp. 24–25 (Dec 2014–Jan 2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Lazzari, P. Sperni, P. Bertin, B. Pavoni, Correlation between inorganic (heavy metals) and organic (PCBs and PAHs) micropollutant concentrations during sewage sludge composting processes. Chemosphere 41, 427–435 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Liang, X. Huang, Y. Qian, Excess sludge reduction in activated sludge process through predation of Aeolosoma hemprichi. Biochem. Eng. J. 28, 117–122 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Liang, X. Huang, Y. Qian, Y. Wei, G. Ding, Determination and comparison of sludge reduction rates caused by microfaunas’ predation. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 854–861 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Lou, P. Sun, M. Guo, G. Wu, Y. Song, Simultaneous sludge reduction and nutrient removal (SSRNR) with interaction between Tubificidae and microorganisms: a full-scale study. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 11132–11136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Milbrink, T. Timm, Distribution and dispersal capacity of the Ponto-Caspian tubificid oligochaete Potamothrix moldaviensis Vejdovský et Mràzek, 1903 in the Baltic Sea Region. Hydrobiologia 463, 93–102 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Nowak, Optimizing the use of sludge treatment facilities at municipal WWTPs. J. Environ. Sci. Health. Part A Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 41, 1807–1817 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y.-K. Oh, K.-R. Lee, K.-B. Ko, I.-T. Yeom, Effects of chemical sludge disintegration on the performance of wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 41, 2665–2671 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Quan, Y. Anfeng, C. Libing, C. Hongzhang, C.-H. Xing, Mechanistic study of on-site sludge reduction in a baffled bioreactor consisting of three series of alternating aerobic and anaerobic compartments. Biochem. Eng. J. 67, 45–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C.H. Ratsak, Effects of Nais elinguis on the performance of an activated sludge plant. Hydrobiologia 463, 217–222 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.H. Ratsak, J. Verkuijlen, Sludge reduction by predatory activity of aquatic oligochaetes in wastewater treatment plants: science or fiction? A review. Hydrobiologia 564, 197–211 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.H. Rensink, W.H. Rulkens, Using metazoan to reduce sludge production. Water Sci. Technol. 36, 171–179 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Statistics Netherlands (CBS), ‘CBS Statline’ webpage. Quoted in [6] (2007), http://statline.cbs.nrl
  23. 23.
    J. Tamis, G. van Schouwenburg, R. Kleerebezem, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, A full scale work reactor for efficient sludge reduction by predation in a wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 45, 5916–5924 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Tian, Y. Lu, Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process in a new Tubificidae-reactor for minimizing nutrient release during sludge reduction. Water Res. 44, 6031–6040 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Z. Wang, H. Yu, J. Ma, X. Zheng, Z. Wu, Recent advances in membrane bio-technologies for sludge reduction and treatment. Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 1187–1199 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Wei, R.T. Van Houten, A.R. Borger, D.H. Eikelboom, Y. Fan, Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res. 37, 4453–4467 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Wei, H. Zhu, Y. Wang, J. Li, P. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Liu, Nutrients release and phosphorus distribution during oligochaetes predation on activated sludge. Biochem. Eng. J. 43, 239–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Q. Zhang, S. Wang, W. Wang, P. Bao, B. Li, Y. Peng, Achieving one-stage sludge reduction by adding Chironomid larvae in wastewater treatment systems. Ecol. Eng. 83, 291–295 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    X. Zhang, Y. Tian, Q. Wang, H. Liu, Waste sludge reduction using Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri: growth, development and sludge predation potential of aquatic worm correlate with process conditions. Ecol. Eng. 58, 406–413 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Zheng, P. Li, Q. Wang, X. Li, H. Ai, K. Gan, A. Sharavsambuu, Pilot-scale experiments on brewery wastewater treatment and sludge reduction based on food chain predation. Desalin. Water Treat. 55, 1142–1151 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and Applied StatisticsUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations