Skip to main content

Uncertainties in Site Characterization Using Surface Wave Techniques and Their Effects on Seismic Ground Response

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Geotechnics for Natural and Engineered Sustainable Technologies

Part of the book series: Developments in Geotechnical Engineering ((DGE))

Abstract

Surface wave methods which utilize the dispersion property of Rayleigh waves are widely used for subsurface site characterization. As a non-invasive method of site characterization, it has many advantages over the invasive methods of geotechnical site characterization. Surface wave methods determine the small strain shear modulus of near-surface materials, and this shear modulus is the key input in the evaluation of the soil response under dynamic/seismic loading. So, the accuracy of testing is very important, otherwise it may lead to significant consequences on the seismic hazard studies. There are different uncertainties associated with surface wave methods. These uncertainties can be broadly classified into three categories: Model-based uncertainty, Data measurement uncertainty, and Inversion uncertainty. Model-based uncertainty basically contains the near-field effects which lead to the underestimation of Rayleigh wave phase velocity. Data measurement uncertainty is another major source of uncertainty, which arises while conducting the surface wave tests due to the noise present in the surroundings in the form of continuous or transient signals. Noise results in a scatter in the measured dispersion curve and this scatter in the dispersion curve may provide different velocity profiles, which are falling in the range of measured data variation. Inversion uncertainty deals with non-unique solution of inversion. Non-unique solution may results into several equivalent velocity profiles, with a good fit with the experimental dispersion curve. Now, the consequence of this data measurement and inversion uncertainty may show significant variation on ground response analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boaga, J., Renzi, S., Vignoli, G., Deiana, R., & Cassiani, G. (2012). From surface wave inversion to seismic site response prediction: Beyond the 1D approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 36, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaga, J., Vignoli, G., & Cassiani, G. (2011). Shear wave profiles from surface wave inversion: The impact of uncertainty on seismic site response analysis. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 8, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaga, J., Vignoli, G., Deiana, R., & Cassiani, G. (2014). The influence of subsoil structure and acquisition parameters in Masw mode mis-identification. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 19(2), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodet, L., Abraham, O., & Clorennec, D. (2009). Near-offset effects on Rayleigh-wave dispersion measurements: physical modelling. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., Comina, C., Boiero, D., & Socco, L. V. (2009). Non-uniqueness in surface-wave inversion and consequences on seismic site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 982–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakka, R. S., Roy, N., & Wason, H. R. (2014). Implications of surface wave data measurement uncertainty on seismic ground response analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 61–62, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakka, R. S., Roy, N., & Wason, H. R. (2015). Reply on “Implications of surface wave data measurement uncertainty on seismic ground response analysis”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 74, 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. B. (1958). In-situ measurement of the dynamic properties of soil by vibration methods. Geotechnique, 8(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. G., Foti, S., & Rix, G. J. (2005). Propagation of data uncertainty in surface wave inversion. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 10(2), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. P., & Lin, C. H. (2007). Effect of lateral heterogeneity on surface wave testing: Numerical simulations and a countermeasure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27, 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louie, J. N. (2001). Faster, better: Shear-wave velocity to 100 meters depth from refraction microtremor arrays. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(2), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marosi, K. T., & Hiltunen, D. R. (2004). Characterization of SASW shear wave velocity measurement uncertainty. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(10), 1034–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian, S., Stokoe, K. H.-I. I., & Hudson, W. R. (1983). Use of spectral analysis of surface waves method for determination of moduli and thicknesses of pavement systems. Transporation Research Record, 930, 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. B., Miller, R. D., & Xia, J. (1999). Multi-channel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics, 64(3), 800–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N., Jakka, R. S., & Wason, H. R. (2013a). Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1-D seismic ground response analysis. Natural Hazards Journal, 68(2), 1141–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N., Jakka, R. S., & Wason, H. R. (2013b). Reply to comment on ‘‘Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis”. Natural Hazards Journal, 75(1), 983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N., & Jakka, R. S. (2017a). Effect of data uncertainty and inversion non-uniqueness of surface wave tests on V s,30 estimation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (Under review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N., & Jakka, R. S. (2017b). Near-field effects on site characterization using MASW Technique. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 97, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobbia, C., & Cassiani, G. (2011). Refraction microtremors (ReMi): Data analysis and diagnostics of key hypotheses. Geophysics, 76(3), MA11–MA20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe II, K. H., Wright, S. G., Bay, J. A., & Roesset, J. M. (1994). Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method geophysical characterization of sites. In R. D. Woods (Ed.) (pp. 15–25). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, D. P., & Cox, B. R. (2016). Site response implications associated with using non-unique Vs profiles from surface wave inversion in comparison with other commonly used methods of accounting for Vs uncertainty. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 91, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J., Miller, R. D., & Park, C. B. (1999). Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh wave. Geophysics, 64(3), 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S., & Rix, G. J. (2009). Near-field effects on array-based surface wave methods with active sources. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135, 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support received from the SERB/DST, Government of India under Young Scientist Scheme (No. ET-016412014) to carry out the research work presented in this paper, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi S. Jakka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jakka, R.S., Roy, N. (2018). Uncertainties in Site Characterization Using Surface Wave Techniques and Their Effects on Seismic Ground Response. In: Krishna, A., Dey, A., Sreedeep, S. (eds) Geotechnics for Natural and Engineered Sustainable Technologies. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7721-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7721-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7720-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7721-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics