Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reliability and Accuracy of Seismic Tests in Geotechnical Site Characterization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geotechnics for Natural and Engineered Sustainable Technologies

Part of the book series: Developments in Geotechnical Engineering ((DGE))

Abstract

Geophysical surveys, and specifically seismic tests, provide powerful tools for geotechnical site investigation. Indeed, they cover the whole range of soils and rocks, independently of particle size, and provide data in the natural state for the characterization at different scales. Assessment of the reliability of the most popular techniques is therefore of primary importance for static and seismic applications. This chapter reports some data from recent experiments devoted to reliability assessment at some reference sites, where intra-method and inter-method variability has been studied. The propagation of the measured uncertainties in soil porosity assessment and seismic ground response analyses is also considered to provide an insight on the consequences in the practice of geotechnical engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrus, R. D., & Stokoe, K. H. (2000). Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126, 1015–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus, R., Chung, R., & Stokoe, K. H. (1998). Delineation of densified sand at treasure island by SASW testing in geotechnical site characterization. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Site Characterization (Isc’98) (pp. 459–64).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, P., & Participants, SESAME (2004). The SESAME project: An overview and main results. In Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Bc, Canada, August (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, P.-Y., Cadet, H., Endrun, B., Hobiger, M., Renalier, F., Theodulidis, N., et al. (2010). From non-invasive site characterization to site amplification: Recent advances in the use of ambient vibration measurements. In Earthquake Engineering in Europe. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biot, M. A. (1956a). Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low-frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 168–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biot, M. A. (1956b). Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. II. Higher frequency range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 179–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, A., Campanella, R., Kaynia, A., & Massarsch, K. (2005). Seismic cone downhole procedure to measure shear wave velocity—A guideline prepared by ISSMGE TC10: Geophysical testing in geotechnical engineering. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callerio, A., Janicki, K., Milani, D., Priano, S., & Signori, M. (2013). Cross-hole tests at Zelazny most tailings pond, Poland-highlights and statistical interpretation of results. In Near Surface Geoscience 2013-19th Eage European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, G. C., & Santamarina, J. C. (2001). Unsaturated particulate materials—particle-level studies. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornou, C., Ohrnberger, M., Boore, D., Kudo, K., & Bard, P-Y. (2006). Derivation of structural models from ambient vibration array recordings: Results from an international blind test. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Grenoble, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosentini, R. M., & Foti, S. (2014). Evaluation of porosity and degree of saturation from seismic and electrical data. Geotechnique, 64, 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B., Wood, C., & Teague, D. (2014). Synthesis of the UTexas1 surface wave dataset blind-analysis study: Inter-analyst dispersion and shear wave velocity uncertainty. In Geo-Congress 2014: Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability (pp. 850–859).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Giulio, G., Savvaidis, A., et al. (2012). Exploring the model space and ranking a best class of models in surface-wave dispersion inversion: Application at European strong-motion sites. Geophysics, 77, B147–B166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., Comina, C., Boiero, D., & Socco, L. (2009). Non-uniqueness in surface-wave inversion and consequences on seismic site response analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 982–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., Garofalo, F., et al. (2017). Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis. A product of the Interpacific project. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, on line first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7.

  • Foti, S., Lai, C. G., & Lancellotta, R. (2002). Porosity of fluid-saturated porous media from measured seismic wave velocities. Géotechnique, 52, 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., Lai, C. G., Rix, G. J., & Strobbia, C. (2014). Surface wave methods for near-surface site characterization. United States: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., Parolai, S., Albarello, D., & Picozzi, M. (2011). Application of surface-wave methods for seismic site characterization. Surveys in Geophysics, 32, 777–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, S., & Passeri, F. (2016). Reliability of soil porosity estimation from seismic wave velocities. In Isc5-International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Soil Characterisation, Gold Coast, Australia (Vol. 1, pp. 425–430).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, F., Foti, S., et al. (2016a). InterPACIFIC project: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part I: Intra-comparison of surface wave methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 82, 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, F., Foti, S., et al. (2016b). InterPACIFIC project: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part II: Inter-comparison between surface-wave and borehole methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 82, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1902). Sur Les Problèmes Aux Dérivées Partielles Et Leur Signification Physique. Princeton University Bulletin, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss, I. (2004). Evolution of the state of practice. In International Workshop on the Uncertainties in Nonlinear Soil Properties and Their Impact on Modeling Dynamic Soil Response, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski, M. (2012). Role of geophysical testing in geotechnical site characterization. Soils and Rocks International Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2: 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski, M. (2014). Soil mechanics and the observational method: Challenges at the Zelazny most copper tailings disposal facility. Géotechnique, 64, 590–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski, M., & Masella, A. (2015). Geotechnical characterization of copper tailings at Zelazny most site. Keynote Lecture, DMT, 15, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, F., Kanemori, T., & Tonouchi, K. (1990). Low-frequency shear wave logging in unconsolidated formations for geotechnical applications. In Geophysical Applications for Geotechnical Investigations. United States: ASTM International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayen, R., Moss, R., et al. (2013). Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Park, H., & Bang, E. (2013). Round Robin test for comparative study of in-situ seismic tests. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, 4, 1427–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. G. (2015). Non-conventional methods for measuring dynamic properties of geomaterials. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurenzano, G., Priolo, E., et al. (2017). Site response estimation at Mirandola by virtual reference station. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15, 2393–2409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. K., & Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of soil behavior. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W., & Vanapalli, S. (2011). The relationship between the elastic and shear modulus of unsaturated soils. In E. Alonso and A. Gens (Eds.), Unsaturated Soils, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (pp. 341–346).

    Google Scholar 

  • Passeri, F., Foti, S., Cox, B., & Rodriguez-Marek A. (2017). Influence of estimated epistemic uncertainties in shear wave velocity models on ground response analyses. Earthquake Spectra (Submitted to).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raptakis, D. G. (2012). Pre-loading effect on dynamic soil properties: Seismic methods and their efficiency in geotechnical aspects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 34, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, E. M., Kottke, A. R., & Trent, W. L. (2010). Influence of input motion and site property variabilities on seismic site response analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136, 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Régnier, J., Bonilla, L. F., et al. (2016). International benchmark on numerical simulations for 1D, nonlinear site response (Prenolin): Verification phase based on canonical cases. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106, 2112–2135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Régnier, J., Bonilla, L. F., et al. (2018). Prenolin: International benchmark on 1D nonlinear site response analysis—validation phase exercise. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170210

  • Schnabel, P. B. (1972). Shake a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites (EERC Report). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socco, L. V., Foti, S., & Boiero, D. (2010). Surface-wave analysis for building near-surface velocity models—established approaches and new perspectives. Geophysics, 75, a83–a102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. P., & Kwok, A. O. (2008). Nonlinear seismic ground response analysis: Code usage protocols and verification against vertical array data. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering And Soil Dynamics IV. United States: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. P., Afshari, K., & Hashash, Y. M. (2014). Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. Peer Rep, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarabusi, G., & Caputo, R. (2017). The use of HVSR measurements for investigating buried tectonic structures: The Mirandola anticline, Northern Italy, as a case study. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 106, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teague, D. P., Cox, B., & Rathje, E. M. (2017). Measured vs. predicted site response at the garner valley downhole array considering shear wave velocity uncertainty from borehole and surface wave methods. Soil Dynamics And Earthquake Engineering (Submitted to).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, K. T., & Hiltunen, D. R. (2011). An assessment of surface wave techniques at the Texas A&M national geotechnical experimentation site. In Geo-Risk 2011: Risk Assessment and Management. United States: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy

    Sebastiano Foti & Federico Passeri

Authors
  1. Sebastiano Foti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federico Passeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiano Foti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India

    A. Murali Krishna

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India

    Arindam Dey

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India

    S Sreedeep

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foti, S., Passeri, F. (2018). Reliability and Accuracy of Seismic Tests in Geotechnical Site Characterization. In: Krishna, A., Dey, A., Sreedeep, S. (eds) Geotechnics for Natural and Engineered Sustainable Technologies. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7721-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7721-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7720-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7721-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation