Conclusion

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a brief conclusion on six major findings obtained from this research, concludes various implications for both theories by addressing the four questions mentioned in the introduction and practice on the process, adoption decision, driver and effects of adoptive management innovation, and lists several limitations and determines future directions.

References

  1. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., Collier, N.: Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base. Brit. J. Manag. 20(Supplement s1), S9–S24 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S.: A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 71–88 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Birkhäuser Basel (1978)Google Scholar
  4. Barreto, I.: Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future. J. Manag. 36(1), 256–280 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Becker, M.C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Post-Print 14(5), 775–791 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Birkinshaw, J., Crainer, S., Mol, M.: Special report on management innovation. Bus. Strategy Rev. 18(1), 45–73 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M.J.: Management innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 33(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Mol, M., Birkinshaw, J.: How management innovation happens. Mit Sloan Manag. Rev. 47(4), 81–88 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, C.C.J., Chen, J.S.: Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 28(5), 444–454 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, W., Freeman, R.B., Kleiner, M.M.: Adoption and termination of employee involvement programs. NBER Working Paper, W12878 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Clausen, T.H.: The Role of Operational and Dynamic Capabilities in Ambidextrous Innovation: A Longitudinal Analysis. In. (2013)Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, W.M., Klepper, S.: Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econ. Stat. 78(2), 232–243 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of The Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1963)Google Scholar
  14. Daft, R.L.: A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 21(2), 193–210 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2), 147–160 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman, M.S.: Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6), 611–629 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm. Sci. Q. 48(1), 94–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Inf. Organ. 18(4), 235–250 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillén, M.F.: Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in A Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)Google Scholar
  20. Hamel, G.: The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(2), 72–84 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. Hart, S.L., Dowell, G.: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J. Manag. 37(5), 1464–1479 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., Winter, S.G.: Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. (2007)Google Scholar
  23. Howell, J.M., Higgins, C.A.: Champions of technological innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(2), 317–341 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohlbacher, M.: The impact of dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement on innovation: the role of business process orientation. Knowl. Proc. Manag. 20(2), 71–76 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kossek, E.E.: Human resources management innovation. Hum. Resour. Manag. 26(1), 71–92 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao, J., Kickul, J.R., Ma, H.: Organizational dynamic capability and innovation: an empirical examination of internet firms. J. Small Bus. Manage. 47(3), 263–286 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. March, J.G., Simon, H.A.: Organizations. Wiley, New York (1958)Google Scholar
  28. Mccabe, D.: ‘Waiting for dead men’s shoes’: towards a cultural understanding of management innovation. Hum. Relat. 55(5), 505–536 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Birkinshaw, J., Mol, M.J.: The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res. 62(12), 1269–1280 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  31. Ortmann, G.: On drifting rules and standards. Scand. J. Manag. 26(2), 204–214 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Osterman, P.: How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 47(2), 173–188 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S.: Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Ind. Corp. Change 14(5), 793–815 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S., Becker, M.C., Liu, P.: Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publishing 49(8), 1484–1508 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. Pentland, B.T., Rem, T., Hillison, D.: The (N)ever-changing world: stability and change in organizational routines. Organ. Sci. 22(6), 1369–1383 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pentland, B.T., Rueter, H.H.: Organizational routines as grammars of action. Adm. Sci. Q. 39(3), 484–510 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ridder, A.K.: Sensing and seizing open innovation: a capability-based approach. In: Paper presented at the DIME-DRUID ACADEMY Winter Conference 2011. Comwell Rebild Bakker (2011)Google Scholar
  38. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28(13), 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J.P., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D., Volberda, H.W.: Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size. J. Manage. Stud. 49(1), 28–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vickery, S., Dröge, C., Germain, R.: The relationship between product customization and organizational structure. J. Oper. Manag. 17(4), 377–391 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, C.L., Ahmed, P.K.: Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 31–51 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu, Q.R., Xie, Z.S.: Study of firm’s innovation synergy and the evolvement model. Stud. Sci. Sci. 22, 327–332 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and EconomicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations