Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 347 Accesses

Abstract

Groundwater pollution risk assessment is the premise and foundation of groundwater pollution prevention and control. In order to make new breakthrough, groundwater pollution risk assessment should be combined with economic analysis to carry on environmental protection and management of groundwater. In Jilin city, the Songhua River, as the main source of water supply, has poor risk condition. The groundwater resources can play a leading role in emergency water supply. Industrial structure was gradually formed to be heavy industry-oriented in the study area. It’s hard to improve the current condition of large consumption of resources, much discharge of pollutants, backward production technology and low utilization of resource in a short period of time. Therefore, it’s significant to reduce the risk of groundwater pollution to carry on ecological construction, develop the appropriate industry development model and eventually realize the balance and sustainable development of resources, environment and economy on the base of industrial adjustment optimization study. The book adopts overlay index method to assess groundwater pollution risk on the condition of taking shallow groundwater as the research object. And then, the mechanism of the industrial structure and groundwater pollution is revealed by identifying high level of groundwater pollution risk and main pollution sources. Finally, the measures of groundwater pollution control are put forward from the perspective of industrial economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chisala BN, Tait NG, Lerner DN. Evaluating the risks of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) pollution of urban groundwater. J Contam Hydrol. 2007;91:128–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Civita MV, Maio M De. Assessment groundwater contamination risk using Arcinfo via GRID function. http://proceedings.esri.com/liberary/userconf/proc97/proc97/to600/pap591/p591.htm, 2006-05-02.

  • Diamantino C, Henriques MJ, Oliveira MM, et al. Methodologies for pollution risk assessment of water resources systems. In: Proceedings of the fourth interceltic colloquium on hydrology and management of water resources, Guimaraes, Portugal;2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriou E, Karaouzas I, Sarantakos K, et al. Groundwater risk assessment at a heavily industrialised catchment and the associated impacts on a peri-urban wetland. J Environ Manag. 2008;88(3):526–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ducci D. GIS techniques for mapping groundwater contamination risk. Nat Hazards. 1999;20:279–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimers L, Weaver J, Terziotti S, et al. Methods of rating unsaturated zone and watershed characteristics of public water supplies in North Carlina. Raleigh, North Carolina: USGS; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng P, Li J. Model for analyzing coordinated groundwater and socio-economic development and its application. Math Practice Theory. 2006;4:61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finizio A, Villa S. Environment risk assessment for pesticides: A tool for decision-makers. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2002;22(3):235–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krneger AB. Environmental impacts of a north american free trade agreement. In: National bureau of economic research working paper;1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZX, Wei YF. A study on methods for economic evaluation of groundwater sources and environmental pollution. In: Outstanding Proceedings of chinese hydraulic engineering society in 1999;1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han MQ, Wang LG. Exploration to economic losses caused by water environmental pollution and agricultural losses. South-to-North Water Transf Water Sci Technol. 2009;7(1):76–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harman WA, Allanand CJ, Forsythe RD. Assessment of potential groundwater contamination sources in a wellhead protection area. J Environ Manag. 2001;62(3):271–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hathhorn W, Wubbena T. Site vulnerability assessment for wellhead protection planning. J Hydrol Eng. 1996;4:152–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Dong DW, Yang GN, et al. Groundwater pollution risk assessment of Haidian district in Beijing. Anal Study. 2010;5(2):44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li JH, Chen SS, Diao WH. Establishing indices for groundwater contamination risk assessment in the vicinity of hazardous waste landfills in China. Environ Pollut. 2012;165:77–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li RZ, Wang MW, Jin J. Fuzzy multiple attribute analysis of groundwater environmental risk. Sci Geogr Sin. 2010;3(2):229–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang J. A study of solute transport and pollution risk of groundwater based on the uncertainty theory. Changsha: Hunan University; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CL. Economic evaluation of geological environmental risk of cities. Shijiazhuang: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CL, Ye H, Dong H, et al. Application of “Concentration-Value Loss Factor” to Assess Economic Loss of Groundwater Pollution in Hutuo-River of Shijiazhuang [J]. Resources Science, 2006;28(6): 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Zhao JF. Decoupling heterogeneity of pollution-intensive industries and industrial transformation in China. China Popul Resour Environ. 2012;22(4):150–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mario CO, Juan AL, Victor RG, et al. Categorical indicator kriging for assessing the risk of groundwater nitrate pollution: The case of Vega de Granada aquifer (SE Spain). Sci Total Environ, 2014;470–471 (1):229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris B, Foster S. Assessment of groundwater pollution risk. http://www.inweb18.worldbank.org/essd/essd.nsf, 2006-05-06.

  • Nobre RCM, Rotunno OC, Mansur WJ, et al. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping using GIS, modeling and a fuzzy logic tool. J Contam Hydrol. 2007;94(3–4):277–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nurun N, Faisal HM, Delawer H. Health and socioeconomic effect of groundwater arsenic contamination in rural bangladesh new evidence from field surveys. J Environ Health. 2008;70(9):42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons R. A South African aquifer system management classification. Water Research Commission;1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng WQ, Zhang XW. Theories and methods of modern water quality Assessment. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen LN, Li GH. Research on groundwater pollution risk zoning methods. Acta Sci Circum. 2010;31(4):918–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen F, Ricardo H, Daniel G, et al. Groundwater quality protection, a guide for water utilities, municipal authorities, and environment agencies. Washington D C: The World Bank; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun CZ, Li XM. Groundwater function evaluation of the Liaohe River Plain based on ArcGIS. Sci Geogr Sin. 2013;33(2):174–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan WB, Zheng M. Exploration to economic evaluation model for groundwater pollution. In: Resources environment industry—Proceedings of 2003 annual conference of china society on economics of geology & mineral resources. September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy 2005;12(2):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng YG, Su J, Zhai YZ, et al. A review of index overlay analysis in groundwater pollution risk assessment. Adv Earth Sci. 2012;27(10):1140–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S Environmental Protection Agency. The hazard ranking system guidance manual. Washington DC: Hazardous site evaluation division office of solid waste and emergency response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Managing groundwater contamination sources in wellhead protection areas- A priority setting approach. USA. EPA;1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Research Council. Valuing Groundwater economic concepts and approaches. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press;1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor RG, Maria PM, Maria JGS, et al. Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution using Random Forest and multisource variables related to intrinsic and specific vulnerability: A case study in an agricultural setting (Southern Spain). Sci Total Environ. 2014;476–477(1):189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Shu LC. Ecological, economic and social significance of groundwater protection. World Geol. 1991;1:170–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, He JT, Chen HH. Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Sci Total Environ. 2012;432(15):216–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang C. Economic losses caused by water pollution in Shandong Province. China Popul Resour Environ. 2006;16(2):83–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LH. A study of economic and environmental effects of Songhua River Basin (Jilin Province) and industrial space organization. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;2013a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JF, Wan SQ. Assessment of the support of groundwater resources for regional economic and social development in China. Res Sci. 2007;5:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang KL. Research on groundwater pollution prevention and control in Hubei Province. J Yangtze University (Nat Sci Edn) 2013b;(34):19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaporozec A. Groundwater contamination inventory-A methodological guide. IHP-VI: UNESCO; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LJ. A summary of research progress on groundwater vulnerability and risk evaluation. Hydrogeol Eng Geol. 2006;6:113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Luis Rodríguez-Lado C, Annette J, Xue HB, Shi JB, Zheng QM, Sun GF. Predicting the risk of arsenic contaminated groundwater in Shanxi Province, Northern China. Environ Pollut. 2012;165:118–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JL, Wei XJ. AHP based comprehensive groundwater evaluation. J Hunan University (Nat Sci Edn). 2006;5:136–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LY, Cao SL. Evaluation of economic losses caused by groundwater environmental damage. Groundwater. 2008;1:4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YY, Pei YS. Risk evaluation of groundwater pollution by pesticides in China: a short review. Procedia Environ Sci. 2012;13:1739–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong W, Wei YS. Analysis of socio-economic development impact on groundwater in the yongding river basin (Beijing section) and wenyu river basin. Acta Sci Circum. 2011;9:1826–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YX, Li WP. Groundwater quality monitoring and assessment. Hydrogeol Eng Geol. 2008;35(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huan, H., Xu, J., Wang, J., Xi, B. (2018). Introduction. In: Groundwater Pollution Risk Control from an Industrial Economics Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7706-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics