Advertisement

Agroforestry pp 817-832 | Cite as

Challenges and Strategies to Address Food and Livelihood Security in Agroforestry

  • Reeta Mishra
  • Yagya Dev Mishra
Chapter

Abstract

Agroforestry combines agriculture and forestry to generate integrated and sustainable land-use systems. It can be regarded as one potential solution in meeting the needs of the society and is influenced by many socioeconomic factors. These factors and their relationship to the agroforestry are highly important as this would help to ascertain the opportunities for the development of agroforestry system. The main socioeconomic factors that determine the actual occurrence of agroforestry are gender, household security, availability of planting materials, shelf life of forest products, access to market, information, and low income. A clear understanding of the influential factors in farmer’s decision-making related to the adoption and maintenance of agroforestry is important.

Agroforestry is a viable option for ensuring food and livelihood security by its multiple services. Homegardens are among the best solutions of household food security and income generation. By growing different nutritious fruits and vegetables in their homesteads, families can have access to all essential nutrients throughout the year. This will go a long way to ensure that their children have a healthy diet. Processed and value-added forest products have the potential to improve livelihoods of poor farmers. Availability and accessible credit facilities to farmers enhance production improvement by easily accessing the required inputs at right times. Extension helps to empower and motivate rural community to enhance and diversify the productivity of their agroforestry systems and in strengthening their capacity to seize market opportunities. Thus, agroforestry can enhance the socioeconomic livelihood of rural people by enhancing food and nutritional security and income-earning potentials. Benefits may take long to make impact, but there is long-run profitability.

Keywords

Agroforestry Homegardens Food security Livelihood security Value addition 

References

  1. Ahlawat S, Hasumati DS (2009) Empowerment of rural women through their participation in agroforestry. Shodh, Samikshaaur Mulyankan. Int Res J 2:549–552Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed MFU, Rahman SML (2000) Agroforestry farming system in the homesteads of Gazipur, Central Bangladesh. Texas A & M University, DallasGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajayi OC, Franzel S, Kuntashula E, Kwesiga F (2003) Adoption of improved fallow technology for soil fertility management in Zambia: empirical studies and emerging issues. Agrofor Syst 59(3):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargali SS, Bargali K, Singh L, Ghosh L, Lakhera ML (2009) Acacia nilotica based traditional agroforestry system: effect on paddy crop and management. Curr Sci 96(4):581–587Google Scholar
  5. Beckford C, Campbell D, Barker D (2011) Sustainable food production systems and food security: economic and environmental imperatives in yam cultivation in Trelawney, Jamaica. Journal of. Sustainability 3:541–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosma RH, Roothaert RL, Asis P, Saguinhon J, Binh LH, Yen VH (2003) Financial and social benefits of new forage technologies in Mindanao, Philippines and Tuyen Quang, Vietnam. CIAT Working Document No. 191. Los Banos, Philippines, International Center for Tropical AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  7. Buyinza M, Wambede N (2008) Extension for agroforestry technology adoption: mixed intercropping of Crotalaria (Crotalaria grahamiana) and Maize (Zea mays L.) in Kabale District, Uganda. Environ Res J 2(30):131–137Google Scholar
  8. Campbell BM, Sayer JA (eds) (2003) Integrated natural resource management: linking productivity, the environment and development. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, p 315Google Scholar
  9. Carandang WM, Tolentino EL, Roshetko JM (2006) Smallholder tree nursery operations in Southern Philippines – supporting mechanisms for timber tree domestication. Int Tree Crops J. in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter J (1995) Socio-economic factors influencing alley farming adoptability. Natural Resource Perspectives. Overseas Development Institute. London. 3 (June). Supplement AGoogle Scholar
  11. Census of India (2011) Census of India-2011, Government of India Publication, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakeredza S, Temu AB, Yaye A, Makungwa S, Saka JDK (2009) Mainstreaming climate change into agricultural education: challenges and perspectives. ICRAF Working Paper – World Agroforestry Centre, p 82Google Scholar
  13. Chaturvedi OP, Krishnan PR (2009) Ecosystem development through agroforestry measures. Agroforestry; natural resources sustainability, livelihood and climate moderation. Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi, pp 55–70Google Scholar
  14. Christoplos I (2010) Mobilizing the potential of rural and agricultural extension. Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (2014) Introduction. In: Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security and ecosystem services; advances in agroforestry, vol 13. Springer, New Delhi, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  16. Degrande A, Arinloye DDA (2014) Gender in agroforestry: implications for action-research. Nat Faune 29(1):6–11Google Scholar
  17. Dhyani SK (2014) National Agroforestry Policy 2014 and the need for area estimation under agroforestry. Curr Sci 107:9–10Google Scholar
  18. Doward A, Chirwa E, Boughton D, Crawford E, Jayne T, Slater R, Kelly V, Tsoka M (2008) Towards ‘smart’ subsidies in agriculture? Lessons from recent experience in Malawi, vol 76. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives 116, London, pp 337–357Google Scholar
  19. Dubois O (2003) Forest-based poverty reduction: a brief review of facts, figures, challenges and possible ways forward. In: Oksanen T, Pajari B, Tuomasjukka T (eds) Forests in poverty reduction strategies: capturing the potential. EFI Proceedings No. 47. European Forest Institute, pp 65–83Google Scholar
  20. Dwivedi RP, Kareemulla K, Singh R, Rizvi RH, Chauhan J (2007) Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in Western Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res J Ext Educ 7(2–3):18–22Google Scholar
  21. Fentahun M, Hager H (2010) Integration of indigenous wild woody perennial edible fruit bearing species in the agricultural landscapes of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 78:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franzel S, Scherr SJ (2002) Introduction. In: Franzel S, Scherr SJ (eds) Trees on the farm: assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frison EA, Cherfas J, Hodgkin T (2011) Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security. Sustainability 3:238–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. FSI, India State of Forest Report (2013) Forest Survey of India (FSI), (Ministry of Environment & Forests), DehradunGoogle Scholar
  25. Glover EK, Lawrence YM (2010) Agroforestry practices among smallholder farmers of Southern Sudan: sustainable land-use, agrobiodiversity and food security. VDM Verlag, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  26. Glover EK, Hassan BA, Glover MK (2013) Analysis of socio-economic conditions influencing adoption of agroforestry practices. Int J Agric Agrofor 3(4):178–184Google Scholar
  27. Guuroh RT, Uibrig H, Acheampong E (2011) Improving benefits from marginal lands: contribution of homegardens to household income generation in the Bieha district of Southern Burkina Faso. Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development held in University of Bonn, 5–7 October 2011, p 5Google Scholar
  28. IFAD (2012) Increasing incomes and reducing poverty for rural smallholder farmers in remote areas of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Extending agricultural dealers networks. An Adaptation of the EADN Final Report, Kenya, p 84Google Scholar
  29. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change) (2000) Land-use, land-use change and forestry. Special Report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Irshad M, Ashraf M, Sher H (2011) Identifying factors affecting agroforestry systems in Swat, Pakistan. Afr J Agric Res 6(11):2586–2593Google Scholar
  31. Islam KK, Sato N (2010) Constraints of participatory agroforestry program to poverty alleviation: the case of the Sal Forests, Bangladesh. American-Eurasian. J Agric Environ Sci 9(4):427–435Google Scholar
  32. Islam MA, Quli SMS, Rai R, Sofi PA (2013) Livelihood contributions of forest resources to the tribal communities of Jharkhand. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 3(2):131–144Google Scholar
  33. Jaenicke H, Simons AJ, Maghembe JA (2000) Domesticating indigenous fruit trees for agroforestry. Acta Hortic 523:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamnadass R, Place F, Torquebiau E, Malézieux E, Iiyama M, Sileshi GW, Kehlenbeck K, Masters E, McMullin S, Weber JC (2013) Agroforestry, food and nutritional security. Unasylva 64(2):241Google Scholar
  35. Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kadzere I, Watkins CB, Merwin IA, Akinnifesi FK, Saka JDK, Mhango J (2006) Harvesting and post harvesting handling practices and characteristics of Uapaca kirkiana (Muell. Arg.) fruits: a survey of roadside markets in Malawi. Agrofor Syst 68:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kareemulla K, Rizvi RH, Kumar K, Dwivedi RP, Singh R (2005) Poplar agroforestry systems in Western Uttar Pradesh: a socio-economic analysis. For Trees Livelihoods 15(4):375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kebebew Z, Garedew W, Debela A (2011) Understanding homegarden in household food security strategy: case study around Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. Res J Appl Sci 6(1):38–43Google Scholar
  39. Kehlenbeck K, Asaah E, Jamnadass R (2013) Diversity of indigenous fruit trees and their contribution to nutrition and livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa: examples from Kenya and Cameroon. In: Fanzo J, Hunter D et al (eds) Diversifying food and diets: using agricultural biodiversity to improve nutrition and health issues in agricultural biodiversity. Earthscan, London, pp 257–269Google Scholar
  40. Kiptot E, Franzel S (2012) Gender and agroforestry in Africa: a review of women’s participation. Agrofor Syst 84:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kiptot E, Franzel S, Degrande A (2014) Gender, agroforestry and food security in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kittur B, Bargali SS (2013) Perspectives of agroforestry: present and future facets. J Prog Agric 4(2):91–94Google Scholar
  43. Koffa SN, Garrity DP (2001) Grassroots empowerment and sustainability in the management of critical natural resources: the Agroforestry Tree Seed Association of Lantapan. In: Coxhead I, Buenavista G (eds) Seeking sustainability: challenges of agricultural development and environmental management in a Philippine watershed, Los Banos Laguna. Philippine Council for Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resources Research (PCCARD), Philippines, pp 197–217Google Scholar
  44. Kumar BM (2006) Agroforestry: the new old paradigm for Asian food security. J Trop Agric 44(1–2):1–14Google Scholar
  45. Kumar A (2009) Rural employment diversification in eastern India: trends and determinants. Agric Econ Res Rev 22:47–60Google Scholar
  46. Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 61:135–152Google Scholar
  47. Kwesiga F, Akinnifesi FK, Mafongoya PL, McDermott MH, Agumya A (2003) Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: review and challenges ahead. Agrofor Syst 59(3):173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lal BS, Rama B, Ahmed HSK (2004) Information technology for rural development: an overview. Econ Challenger 6(23):34–37Google Scholar
  49. Leakey RRB, Simons AJ (1997) Domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty. Agrofor Syst 38(1/3):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leakey RRB, Weber JC, Page T, Cornelius JP, Akinnifesi FK, Roshetko JM, Tchoundjeu Z, Jamnadass R (2012) Tree domestication in agroforestry: progress in the second decade (2003–2012). In: Nair PKR,Google Scholar
  51. Lulandala LLL (2011) Agroforestry concepts, systems, practices, potentials, constraints, research and training needs. MSc. MNRSA Lecture Notes, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  52. Mai PT (1999) Socio-economic analysis of shifting cultivation versus agroforestry system in the upper stream of lower Mekong watershed in Dak Lak province. MA thesis in economics of development, College of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  53. Malla YB (2000) Farmer’s tree management strategies in a changing rural economy and factors influencing decisions on tree growing in Nepal. Int Tree Crop J 10:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mariro AT (2009) The contribution of homegardens to household food security in Morogoro Municipality. Dissertation for award of MSc degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, p 63Google Scholar
  55. Maske M, Mungole A, Kamble R, Chaturvedi A, Chaturvedi A (2011) Impact of non-timber forest produces (NTFPs) on rural tribes economy in Gondia district of Maharashtra, India. Arch Appl Sci Res 3(30):109–114Google Scholar
  56. Mendez VE, Lok R, Somarriba E (2001) Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. J Agrofor Syst 51(2):85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mercer D (2004) Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: a review. Agrofor Syst 61:311–328Google Scholar
  58. Miah MG, Ahmed FU, Ahmed MM, Alam MN, Choudhury NH, Hamid MA (2002) Agroforestry in Bangladesh: potentials and opportunities. Paper presented in South Asia regional agroforestry consultation workshop held on 23–25 November at New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller RP, Nair PKR (2006) Indigenous agroforestry systems in Amazonia: from prehistory to today. Agrofor Syst 66:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Montambault JR, Alavalapati JRR (2005) Socio-economic research in agroforestry: a decade in review. Agrofor Syst 65:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mrindoko S (2012) Tanzania ignorance on banking operations says report. Impedes access to credit facilities. Daily Newspaper, 28 February, p 1Google Scholar
  62. Nair PKR (2011) Agroforestry systems and environmental quality: introduction. J Environ Qual 40(3):784–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ndoye O, Awono A, Schreckenberg K (2004) Commercializing indigenous fruit for poverty alleviation. Policy briefing for governments in the African humid tropics. ODI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Neupane RP, Sharma KR, Thapa GB (2002) Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. Agric Syst 72:177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Padmavathy A, Poyyamoli G (2011) Alternative farming techniques for sustainable food production. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Genetics, biofuels and local farming systems. Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol 7. Springer, Cham, pp 367–424Google Scholar
  67. Pandey DN (2007) Multifunctional agroforestry systems in India. Curr Sci 92(4/25):455–463Google Scholar
  68. Parwada C, Gadziraye CT, Muriritirwa WT, Mwenye D (2010) Adoption of agro-forestry technologies among smallholder farmers: a case of Zimbabwe. J Dev Agric Econ 2(10):351–358Google Scholar
  69. Peterson JS (1999) Kubweletza Nthaka: ethnographic decision trees and improved fallows in the Eastern Province of Zambia (Report to the University of Florida’s ‘Gender and soil fertility in Africa’ Soils Management Collaboration Research Support Program (CRSP) and the International Centre for Research on Agroforestry): University of Florida and ICRAFGoogle Scholar
  70. Predo CD (2002) Bioeconomic analysis of land use options for grassland areas in Claveria, Misamis Oriental. Leyte State University, LeyteGoogle Scholar
  71. Pretty JN, Morison JIL, Hine RE (2003) Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Puri S, Nair PKR (2004) Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agrofor Syst 61/62:437–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Sunderland T (2014) Increasing tree cover in degrading landscapes: ‘integration’ and ‘intensification’ of smallholder forest culture in the alutilla valley, Matiranga, Bangladesh, vol 13, pp 237–249Google Scholar
  74. Rai A, Srivastava AK, Singh M (2006) A socio-economic study on agroforestry in Chhachhrauli Block of Yamuna Nagar District of Haryana. Indian J Agrofor 3(2):148–152Google Scholar
  75. Ramathani T (2002) Marketing of indigenous fruits in Zimbabwe. Socio-economic studies on rural development 129. Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, KielGoogle Scholar
  76. Rizvi RH, Dhyani SK, Newaj R, Karmakar PS, Saxena A (2014) Mapping agroforestry area in India through remote sensing and preliminary estimates. Indian Farm 63(11):62–64Google Scholar
  77. Roshetko JM, Nugraha E, Tukan JCM, Manurung G, Fay C, van Noordwijk M (2007). Agroforestry for livelihood enhancement and enterprise development. In: Djoeroemana S, Myers B, Russell-Smith J, Blyth M, Salean IET (eds) Integrated rural development in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Proceedings of a workshop to identify sustainable rural livelihoods, Kupang, 5–7 April 2006, pp 137–148. ACIAR Proceedings No.126. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  78. Roshetko JM, Rohadi D, Perdana A, Sabastian G, Nuryartono N, Pramono AA, Widyani N, Manalu P, Fauzi MA, Sumardamto P, Kusumowardhani N (2013) Teak agroforestry systems for livelihood enhancement, industrial timber production, and environmental rehabilitation. For Trees Livelihoods 22(4):251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sarmah R, Arunachalam A (2011) Contribution of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to livelihood economy of people living in forest fringes in Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 1(2):157–169Google Scholar
  80. Saxena NC (2000) Farm and agroforestry in India – Policy and legal issues Planning Commission. Government of India, p 50Google Scholar
  81. Schreckenberg K, Awono A, Degrande A (2006) Domesticating indigenous fruit trees as a contribution to poverty reduction. For Trees Livelihoods 16:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shackleton CM, Pandey AK (2014) Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda. Forest Policy Econ 38:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sharma D, Tiwari BK, Chaturvedi SS, Diengdoh E (2015) Status, utilization and economic valuation of non-timber forest products of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian J Environ Sci 31(1):24–37Google Scholar
  84. Shit PK, Pati CK (2012) Non-timber forest products for livelihood security of tribal communities: a case study in Paschim Medinipur district, West Bengal. J Hum Ecol 40(2):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Singh PK, Quli SMS (2011) Economic valuation of non-timber forest product’s contribution in tribal livelihood in West Singhbhum district of Jharkhand. Indian Forester 137(11):1258–1264Google Scholar
  86. Susila AD, Purwoko BS, Roshetko JM, Palada MC, Kartika JG, Dahlia L et al (eds) (2012) Vegetable-agroforestry systems in Indonesia. Bangkok, World Association of Soil and Water Conservation and Nairobi, World Agroforestry CentreGoogle Scholar
  87. Tewari DD (2014) Is big business approach to managing nontimber forest products (NTFPs) benign? Rising unsustainable extraction and looming policy challenges. J Hum Ecol 47(1):87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thanh MV (2005) Center for agricultural research and ecological studies, Hanoi Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  89. Williams-Guillen K, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Bats limit insects in a tropical agroforestry system. Science 320:70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. World Bank, FAO and IFAD (2009) Gender in agricultural: sourcebook. Agroforestry landscape: gendered space, knowledge, and practice. Module 15. WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan KendraMorenaIndia
  2. 2.Directorate of Extension Services, RVSKVVGwaliorIndia

Personalised recommendations