Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agroforestry

Abstract

Agroforestry, based on ecological principles, is of paramount importance in the areas where crop production is very insecure due to variable and harsh climatic conditions. Besides providing food, fodder, fuel, timber and several other products of day-to-day use, agroforestry offers security to inhabitants and their animals during famines and droughts. Forestry with agriculture provides support to the farming system by way of conferring stability and generating assured income. Agroforestry can mitigate the impact and consequences of these environmental limiting factors. Time-honoured suitable agroforestry models are required, especially for the arid regions. Agroforestry, as subject of scientific investigation, assumes wider recognition in view of the need to maximise production based on sustainable land management. During the past four decades, agroforestry has come of age and begun to attract the attention of the international scientific community, primarily as a means for sustaining agricultural productivity in marginal lands and solving the second-generation problems such as secondary salinization due to waterlogging and contamination of water resources due to use of excess nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides. Research efforts have shown that most of the degraded areas including saline, waterlogged and perturbation ecologies like mine spoils and coastal degraded mangrove areas can be made productive by adopting suitable agroforestry techniques involving highly remunerative components such as plantation-based farming systems, high-value medicinal and aromatic plants, livestock, poultry, forest and fruit trees and vegetables. New concepts such as integrated farming systems, domestication of high-value native plants and urban and peri-urban agroforestry have emerged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akinnifesi FK, Smucker AJM, Kang BT (1999) Belowground dynamics in agroforestry systems. Ann Arid Zone 38(3&4):239–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangarwa KS (1998) Tree species for biomass production in fragile environments. In: Narula N, Bangarwa KS (eds) Perspectives in sustainable agriculture. Society of Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management, Bio-Science Publishers, Hisar, pp 75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) (2008) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 382 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhimaya CP, Mishra DK, Das RB (1958) Importance of shelterbelts in arid zone farming. In: Proceedings of farm forestry symposiums. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Carborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and microclimate, Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 2. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, 134 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra JP (1986) Popular, a cash crop for North Indian farmers. Indian For 112:698–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi AN (1981) Poplar for planting. Uttar Pradesh Forest Department Bulletin No. 50, Lucknow, 27 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC (2014) Greening salty and waterlogged lands through agroforestry systems for livelihood security and better environment. In: Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security & ecosystem services, Advances in agroforestry, vol 10, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 273–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Minhas PS (eds) (2016) Agroforestry for management of waterlogged saline soils and poor-quality waters, advances in agroforestry, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht, p 210

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Tewari JC (eds) (2016) Agroforestry research developments. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York, p 578

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Singh G, Singh NT (2001) Evaluation of forest and fruit trees used for rehabilitation of semiarid alkali soils in India. Arid Land Res Manag 15:115–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) (2014) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security & ecosystem services, Advances in agroforestry, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht, p 400

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire (1974) Plants and environment. Wiley Eastern Private Ltd, New Delhi, p 422

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwiwedi AP, Sharma KK (1989) Agroforestry its potential. Paper presented in seminar on social forestry and agroforestry, Forest Research Institute (FRI), Dehra Dun, India

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1977) Report of the fourth session of the FAO panel of experts on forest genetic resources held at Canberra, Australia. FAO, Rome, 75 p

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda: a guide for decision-makers. Compiled by Buttoud G in collaboration with Ajayi O, Detlefsen G, Place F, Torquebiau E. Agroforestry Working Paper No. 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AB, Harris DG, Wills WO (1976) Influence of windbreaks on crop performance and snow management in North Dakota. In: Tinus RW (ed) Shelterbelts on the Great Plains, Proceedings of Symposium, GPAC Publication No. 78, Denver Co, USA, pp 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • George M (1978) Interception, stem flow and throughfall in Eucalyptus hybrid plantations. Indian For 104:719–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh RC, Subba Rao BK, Ramola BC (1980) Interception studies in sal (Shorea robusta) coppice forest. Indian For 106:513–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE, Palmer JW (1979) A simple model of light transmission and interception by discontinuous canopies. Ann Bot 44:381–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2010) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits, Advances in agroforestry, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, p 264

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul RN (1959) Shelterbelts to stop creep of the desert. Indian For 85:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishwan J (1996) India: agroforestry policy framework. APA News No. 12. Newsletter of Asia-Pacific Agroforestry Network, Bogor, pp 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2006) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, p 380

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri AK (1983) Agroforestry in West Bengal part I and II. In: Mathur RS, Gogate MS (eds) Proceedings of national workshop on agroforestry, Karnal (Haryana), India, pp 218–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur RS, Sharma KK (1983) Poplars in India. Indian Forester 109:519–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur RS, Sharma KK, Ansari MV (1984) Economics of Eucalyptus plantations under agroforestry. Indian For 110:171–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1987) Soil productivity under agroforestry. In: Gholz HL (ed) Agroforestry: realities, possibilities and potential. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (2012) Climate change mitigation and adaptation: a low hanging fruit of agroforestry. In: Nair PKR, Garrity DP (eds) Agroforestry: the future of global land use, Advances in agroforestry, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Dagar JC (1991) An approach to developing methodologies for evaluating agroforestry systems in India. Agrofor Syst 16:55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) (2012) Agroforestry-the future of global land use, Advances in agroforestry, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht, p 541

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National AF Policy (2014) National agroforestry policy 2014. Government of India, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel VJ (1988) A new strategy to high density agroforestry. Jivrajbhai Patel Agroforestry Centre, Surendrabag, Bhavnagar, p 57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai VKK (1983) Agroforestry relevance and scope. In: Mathur RS, Gogate MS (eds) Proceedings of national workshop on agroforestry, Karnal (Haryana), India, pp 76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan IP (1973) Preliminary study of rainfall in interception through leaf litter. Indian For 99:440–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M, Sita Ram (1980) Influence of shelterbelts on annual crops. In: Proceedings of second forestry conference held at Forest Research Institute (FRI), Dehra Dun, India, pp 525–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanghal PM (1983) Species compatibility considerations in agroforestry: the state of art in India. In: Mathur RS, Gogate MS (eds) Proceedings of national workshop on agroforestry, Karnala (Haryana), India, pp 416–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Schaller M, Jimenez F (2008) Below-ground interactions in tree-crop agroforestry. In: Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, p 382

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Dagar JC (2005) Greening sodic lands: Bichhian model. Technical Bulletin No.2/2005 CSSRI, Karnal, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Arrawatia ML, Tewari VP (1998) Agroforestry for sustainable development in arid zones of Rajasthan. Int Tree Crops J 9:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solanki MS (1981) Forests as a sources of food, vol I and II. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari VP, Singh M (2000) Agroforestry: an alternative land use system in fragile hot arid ecosystem. In: Singh A, Dudeja SS, Singh S (eds) Resource management for sustainable agriculture. Society of Sustainable Agriculture and Resource Management, Hisar, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari JC, Bohra MD, Harsh LN (1999) Structure and production function of traditional extensive agroforestry systems and scope of agroforestry in Thar Desert. Indian J Agrofor 1(1):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari JC, Moola-Ram RMM, Dagar JC (2014) Livelihood improvements and climate change adaptations through agroforestry in hot arid environments. In: Dagar JC, Singh AK, Arunachalam A (eds) Agroforestry systems in India: livelihood security & ecosystem services, Advances in agroforestry, vol 10, pp 155–184

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verinumbe I (1987) Crop production on soil under some forest plantations in the Sahel. Agrofor Syst 5:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1989) Ten hypotheses for soil agroforestry research. Agrofor Today 1:13–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vindhya P. Tewari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tewari, V.P., Dagar, J.C. (2017). Introduction. In: Dagar, J., Tewari, V. (eds) Agroforestry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7650-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics