Abstract
Urea synthesis processes have been carried out at relatively high temperature (160–270 °C) and high pressure (120–250 bar). The use of high temperature and high pressure in urea synthesis is essential to increase production rate that would result in high profitability. New reaction method is proposed to produce the urea that requires lower pressure and temperature as compared to the conventional urea synthesis. This method is clean and green, used for the sustainable development that might change the landscape of future chemical processes. However, this is made possible due to the enhancement in nanotechnology where quantum mechanical understanding is called into play. New reactor designs are elaborated and discussed explicitly. Hematite nanocatalysts are used for this green urea synthesis process, in the presence of static and oscillating magnetic fields. Strategies to increase single to triplet conversion rate are performed for the better understanding on how to increase the urea rate of production. The focus on scrutinizing the greenhouse gas effect on the urea yield, in this case CO2 flow rate, is deliberated explicitly. The magnetic field strength and electromagnetic frequency are studied and empirically done for better understanding in singlet to triplet conversion. The highest urea yield of 17,472 ppm was obtained using a 1T static magnetic field, electromagnetic field of 5 GHz frequency, and 0.2 L/min CO2 flow rate. It is found that in the case of the pilot-scale reactor, urea yield has its optimum yield, 0.6 kg/hr, at 200 °C, 50 bar, and 3.25 GHz microwave frequency. This new method is a contender for urea and ammonia production that may change the landscape of chemical reaction in the future especially when zero carbon dioxide emission is required for the future sustainable development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Smil, V. (2004). Enriching the earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the transformation of world food production. MIT press.
Maxwell, G. R. (2004). Synthetic nitrogen products: a practical guide to the products and processes, pp. 267–284.
Meessen, J. H., & Petersen, H. (1996). Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry.
Isla, M. A., Irazoqui, H. A., & Genoud, C. M. (1993). Simulation of a urea synthesis reactor. 1. Thermodynamic framework. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 32, 2662–2670.
Irazoqui, H. A., Isla, M. A., & Genoud, C. M. (1993). Simulation of a urea synthesis reactor. 2. Reactor model. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 32, 2671–2680.
Jiles, D. (2015). Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials. CRC press.
Alqasem, B., Yahya, N., Soleimani, H., Qureshi, S., Irfan, M., & Rehman, Z. U. (2016). Experimental study on the effect of saturation magnetization of hematite nanocatalyst for green ammonia production. In: AIP conference proceedings, p. 030002.
Kiebarev, S., Ea, P., & Shustov, A. (1972). Influence of a magnetic-field on the photooxidation rate of some crystalline aromatic-hydrocarbons. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 204, 376.
Lawler, R., & Evans, G. (1971). Some chemical consequences of magnetic interactions in radical pairs. Providence: Brown University.
Frankevich, E., & Sokolik, I. (1971). Influence of magnetic field on the rate of photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 14, 577.
Turro, N. J. (1983). Influence of nuclear spin on chemical reactions: Magnetic isotope and magnetic field effects (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 80, 609–621.
Schulten, K. (1982). Magnetic field effects in chemistry and biology. Festkörperprobleme, 22, 61–83.
Hayashi, H. (2004). Introduction to dynamic spin chemistry: magnetic field effects on chemical and biochemical reactions, vol. 8: World Scientific Publishing Co Inc.
McLauchlan, K. (1981). The effects of magnetic fields on chemical reactions. Science Progress (1933-), 67, 509–529.
Timmel, C., Till, U., Brocklehurst, B., McLauchlan, K., & Hore, P. (1998). Effects of weak magnetic fields on free radical recombination reactions. Molecular Physics, 95, 71–89.
Steiner, U., & Ulrich, T. (1989). Magnetic field effects in chemical kinetics and related phenomena. Chemical Reviews, 89, 51–147.
Yue, Q., Shao, Z., Chang, S., & Li, J. (2013). Adsorption of gas molecules on monolayer MoS 2 and effect of applied electric field. Nanoscale Research Letters, 8, 425.
Woodward, J. (2002). Radical pairs in solution. Progress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism, 27, 165–207.
Stass, D., Woodward, J., Timmel, C., Hore, P., & McLauchlan, K. (2000). Radiofrequency magnetic field effects on chemical reaction yields. Chemical Physics Letters, 329, 15–22.
Woodward, J., Jackson, R., Timmel, C., Hore, P., & McLauchlan, K. (1997). Resonant radiofrequency magnetic field effects on a chemical reaction. Chemical Physics Letters, 272, 376–382.
Timmel, C., & Hore, P. (1996). Oscillating magnetic field effects on the yields of radical pair reactions. Chemical Physics Letters, 257, 401–408.
Yahya, N., Qureshi, S., Rehman, Z. U., Alqasem, B., Fai Kait, C. (2017). Green urea synthesis catalyzed by hematite nanowires in magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 428, 469–480.
Alqasem, B., Yahya, N., Qureshi, S., Irfan, M., Rehman, Z. U., & Soleimani, H. (2017). The enhancement of the magnetic properties of α-Fe2O3 nanocatalyst using an external magnetic field for the production of green ammonia. Materials Science and Engineering B, 217, 49–62.
Yahya, N., Alqasem, B., Irfan, M., Qureshi, S., Rehman, Z. U., Shafie, A., et al. (2016). The effect of saturation magnetization of nanocatalyst and oscillating magnetic field for green urea synthesis. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 507, 95–106.
Yahya, N., Puspitasari, P. (2013). Y3Fe5O12 nanocatalyst for green ammonia production by using magnetic induction method. Journal of Nano Research, 131–137.
Qureshi, S., Yahya, N., Kait, C. F., Alqasem, B., & Irfan, M. (2017). Enhanced catalytic activity of α-Fe2O3 with the adsorption of gases for ammonia synthesis. In Materials science forum, pp. 15–18.
Boxer, S. G., Chidsey, C. E., & Roelofs, M. G. (1983). Magnetic field effects on reaction yields in the solid state: an example from photosynthetic reaction centers. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 34, 389–417.
Atkins, P., & Lambert, T. (1975). The effect of a magnetic field on chemical reactions. Annual Reports on the Progress of Chemistry, Section A: Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, 72, 67–88.
Sagdeev, R., Molin, Y. N., Salikhov, K., Leshina, T., Kamha, M., & Shein, S. (1973). Effects of magnetic field on chemical reactions. Organic Magnetic Resonance, 5, 603–605.
Jing-Biao, C., Feng-Zhi, W., Dong-Hai, Y., & Yi-Qiu, W. (2001). Alternating current zeeman and stark interference effect in ramsey separated oscillating fields. Chinese Physics Letters, 18, 202.
Autler, S. H., & Townes, C. H. (1955). Stark effect in rapidly varying fields. Physical Review, 100, 703.
Hedvall, J. A. (1935). Über die im Verlauf von Phasenäunderungen in festen stoffen auftretende erhöuhung der chemischen Reaktionsfähigkeit. Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie und Angewandte Physikalische Chemie, 41, 445–448.
Hedvall, J. A., Hedin, R., & Persson, O. (1934). Ferromagnetic transformation and catalytic activity. Zeitschrift fur Physikalische Chemie, Abteilung B, 27, 196.
Petrucci, H., & Madura, H. (2007). General chemistry principles and modern applications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical reaction engineering (3rd ed.), pp. 211–214.
Scott Fogler, H. (2005). Element of chemical reaction engineering (4th ed.), pp. 511–512.
Kjeldahl, J. Z. (1883). A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic bodies. Analytical Chemistry 22, 366.
Richardson, J. T. (2009). Journal of Applied Catalyst. 3, 1781–1786.
Mavrovic, I. (1965). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,172,911, issued Mar 9, 1965.
Cook, L. H. (1974). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,816,528, issued Jun 11, 1974.
Cook, L. H., & Mavrovic, I. (1965). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,200,148, issued Aug 10, 1965.
Maxim, K. (1972). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,668,250, issued Jun 6, 1972.
Marten, J. H., Nixon, N. J. (1967). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,354,205 issued Nov 21, 1967.
Mavrovic, I. (1981). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 4, 296,252, issued Oct 20, 1981.
Cook, L. H. (1968). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,370,090, issued Feb 20, 1968.
Mavrovic, I. (1970). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,527,799, issued Sep 8, 1970.
Sakata, E., & Kojima, Y. (2003). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 6,518,457, issued Feb 11, 2003.
Mavrovic, I. (1971). Urea Synthesis Process. U.S. Patent 3,579,636, issued May 18, 1971.
Christoph, M., Denis, K., Olaf, V. M., & Matthias, K. P. (2017). Method for preparation of ammonia gas and CO2 for a urea synthesis process. U.S. Patent 20,170,210,703 issued Jul 27, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yahya, N. (2018). Reactor Design for Novel Green Urea Synthesis. In: Green Urea . Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7578-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7578-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7577-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7578-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)