Advertisement

GA_DTNB: A Hybrid Classifier for Medical Data Diagnosis

  • Amit Kumar
  • Bikash Kanti Sarkar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 695)

Abstract

Recent trends in medical data prediction have become one of the most challenging tasks for the researchers due to its domain specificity, voluminous, and class imbalanced nature. This paper proposed a genetic algorithms (GA)-based hybrid approach by combining decision table (DT) and Naïve Bayes (NB) learners. The proposed approach is divided into two phases. In the first phase, feature selection is done by applying GA search. In the second phase, the newly obtained feature subsets are used as input to combined DTNB to enhance the classification performances of medical data sets. In total, 14 real-world medical domain data sets are selected from University of California, Irvine (UCI) machine learning repository, for conducting the experiment. The experimental results demonstrate that GA-based DTNB is an effective hybrid model in undertaking medical data prediction.

Keywords

Prediction GA NB DTNB Medical 

References

  1. 1.
    Seera, M., Lim, C.P.: A hybrid intelligent system for medical data classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(5), 2239–2249 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Selvakuberan, K., Kayathiri, D., Harini, B., Devi, M.I.: An efficient feature selection method for classification in health care systems using machine learning techniques. In: 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology (ICECT), vol. 4, pp. 223–226. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kahramanli, H., Allahverdi, N.: Design of a hybrid system for the diabetes and heart diseases. Expert Syst. Appl. 35(1), 82–89 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, C.S., Wang, M.H.: A fuzzy expert system for diabetes decision support application. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 41(1), 139–153 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalaiselvi, C., Nasira, G.M.: A new approach for diagnosis of diabetes and prediction of cancer using ANFIS. In: World Congress Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT), pp. 188–190. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, H., Tan, C.: Prediction of type-2 diabetes based on several element levels in blood and chemometrics. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 147(1–3), 67–74 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garg, A.X., Adhikari, N.K., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M.P., Devereaux, P.J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., Haynes, R.B.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293(10), 1223–1238 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C.A., Balas, E.A., Lobach, D.F.: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330(7494), 765 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narasingarao, M.R., Manda, R., Sridhar, G.R., Madhu, K., Rao, A.A.: A clinical decision support system using multilayer perceptron neural network to assess well being in diabetes. pp. 127–133. (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, X.M., Zhang, Y.H.: A new application of rough set to ECG recognition. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp. 1729—1734. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srimani, P.K., Koti, M.S.: Rough set (RS) approach for optimal rule generation in medical datawork. 2(2), 9–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye, C.Z., Yang, J., Geng, D.Y., Zhou, Y., Chen, N.Y.: Fuzzy rules to predict degree of malignancy in brain glioma. Med. Biol. Eng. Compu. 40(2), 145–152 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Syeda-Mahmood, T.F.: Role of machine learning in clinical decision support (Presentation Recording). In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics 94140U–94140U (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagholikar, K.B., Sundararajan, V., Deshpande, A.W.: Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions. J. Med. Syst. 36(5), 3029–3049 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martis, R.J., Lin, H., Gurupur, V.P., Fernandes, S.L.: Frontiers in development of intelligent applications for medical imaging processing and computer vision (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajinikanth, V., Satapathy, S.C., Fernandes, S.L., Nachiappan, S.: Entropy based segmentation of tumor from brain MR images–a study with teaching learning based optimization. Pattern Recognit. Lett. (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gautam, A., Bhateja, V., Tiwari, A., Satapathy, A.C.: An improved mammogram classification approach using back propagation neural network. In: Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing, pp. 369–376. Springer, Singapore (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dey, N., Bhateja, V., Hassanien, A.E. (eds.): Medical Imaging in Clinical Applications: Algorithmic and Computer-Based Approaches, vol. 651. Springer (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. MIT press (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall, M.A., Frank, E.: Combining Naive Bayes and Decision Tables. In: FLAIRS Conference, vol. 2118, pp. 318–319. (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology(DU)MesraIndia

Personalised recommendations