Advertisement

Hurst Exponent as a New Ingredient to Parametric Feature Set for Mental Task Classification

  • Akshansh Gupta
  • Dhirendra Kumar
  • Anirban Chakraborti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 701)

Abstract

Electroencephalograph (EEG) is a popular modality to capture signals associated with brain activities in a given time window. One of the powerful applications of EEG signal is in developing Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) systems. Response to mental tasks is one of BCI systems which helps disabled persons to communicate their need to the machines through signals related to particular thought also known as Mental Task Classification (MTC). The success of application depends on the efficient analysis of these signals for further classification. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), a filter-based heuristic technique, is utilized to analyze EEG signal in the recent past. In this work, feature extraction from the EEG signal is done in two stages. In the first stage, the signal is broken into a number of oscillatory functions by means of EMD algorithm. The second stage involves compact representation in terms of eight different statistics (features) obtained from each function. Hurst Exponent as a new ingredient to parametric feature set is investigated to check its suitability for MTC. Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier is utilized to develop a classification model and to validate the proposed approach for feature construction for classifying the different mental tasks. Experimental result on a publicly available dataset shows the superior performance of the proposed approach in comparison to the state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Brain–computer interface Response to mental tasks Feature extraction Empirical mode decomposition Electroencephalograph 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Cognitive Science Research Initiative (CSRI), DST and DBT, Govt. of India, and CSIR, India for obtained research grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.W., Stolz, E.A., Shamsunder, S.: Multivariate autoregressive models for classification of spontaneous electroencephalographic signals during mental tasks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45(3), 277–286 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Lazzarini, L., Millan, J., Mourino, J., Varsta, M., Heikkonen, J., Bianchi, L., Marciani, M.: Linear classification of low-resolution eeg patterns produced by imagined hand movements. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8(2), 186–188 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals. J. Neural Eng. 4(2), R32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cajueiro, D.O., Tabak, B.M.: The hurst exponent over time: testing the assertion that emerging markets are becoming more efficient. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 336(3), 521–537 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diez, P.F., Torres, A., Avila, E., Laciar, E., Mut, V.: Classification of Mental Tasks Using Different Spectral Estimation Methods. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faradji, F., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: Plausibility assessment of a 2-state self-paced mental task-based bci using the no-control performance analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 180(2), 330–339 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, A., Agrawal, R., Kaur, B.: Performance enhancement of mental task classification using eeg signal: a study of multivariate feature selection methods. Soft Comput. 19(10), 2799–2812 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta, A., Kirar, J.S.: A novel approach for extracting feature from eeg signal for mental task classification. In: 2015 International Conference on Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet), pp. 829–832. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.C., Tung, C.C., Liu, H.H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903–995 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurst, H.E.: Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 116, 770–808 (1951)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kauhanen, L., Nykopp, T., Lehtonen, J., Jylanki, P., Heikkonen, J., Rantanen, P., Alaranta, H., Sams, M.: Eeg and meg brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14(2), 190–193 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keirn, Z.A., Aunon, J.I.: A new mode of communication between man and his surroundings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37(12), 1209–1214 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C., Schlogl, A., Lugger, K.: Separability of eeg signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6(3), 316–325 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L.A., Stanley, H.E.: Econophysics: financial time series from a statistical physics point of view. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 279(1), 443–456 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tiwari, D.K., Bhateja, V., Anand, D., Srivastava, A., Omar, Z.: Combination of eemd and morphological filtering for baseline wander correction in emg signals. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Micro-Electronics, Electromagnetics and Telecommunications, pp. 365–373. Springer (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akshansh Gupta
    • 1
  • Dhirendra Kumar
    • 2
  • Anirban Chakraborti
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computational and Integrative SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.AIM & ACT, Banasthali VidyapithNiwaiIndia

Personalised recommendations