Skip to main content

Critical Issues of Advanced Design Thinking: Scheme of Synthesis, Realm of Out-Frame, Motive of Inner Sense, and Resonance to Future Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

In discussing “design thinking,” which is expected to lead innovation at the social level, this chapter first explores the synthetic scheme of concept generation for design thinking from the perspective of creativity. The characteristics of design thinking through high-order concept generation are clarified in comparison with those of first-order concept generation. The comparison is based on the results of an experimental study for a deeper understanding of design-led human creativity, particularly, “design creativity.” Subsequently, this chapter challenges a creative leap that suggests “out-frame” realm of design thinking. It will overcome the conservative “in-frame” thinking. By clarifying the features of creative design thinking initiated by inner sense, we confirm a meaning of design creativity inspired by concept generation rooted in resonance experiences during design thinking. As it encourages creative exploration, inner sense can be situated as a motive beyond problem solving. Further, the essential features of individual creative design thinking, which form the fundamental competence of design thinking in interdisciplinary group work, are discussed. Based on discussion of individual design thinking, we identify the core motivation of “advanced design thinking” through interdisciplinary co-creative design that goes beyond empathy to find a meaningful curriculum for group work in the future. Finally, this chapter concludes with a summary of the critical issues of advanced design thinking, aiming to lead future social innovation that may cause qualitative changes to society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.olfa.co.jp/en/contents/cutter/birth.html.

  2. 2.

    For further information http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/eng-mech-design/2016DS/index.html.

References

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). Singapore: Taylor & Francis Asia Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “Mini-C” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1996). Dimensions of creativity, a Bradford book. London: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. CA: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review (SSIR), CA. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation.

  • Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18(4), 427–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity. UK: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design (design thinking, design theory). London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial board members of IJDCI. (2013). Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis; verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings. In mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S., & McNeill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of Design Creativity. Design Studies, 26(6), 593–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K., & Thagard, P. (1999). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junaidy, D. W., & Nagai, Y. (2013). The in-depth cognitive levels of imagination of artisans and designers. Journal of Design Research, 11(4), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Architectural.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsey, J. S., Markman, A. B., & Wood, K. L. (2012). Design by analogy: A study of the WordTree methods for problem re-presentation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(4), 41009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, T. (2009). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, Y. (2014). A sense of design principia. In T. Taura (Ed.), Principia designae: Pre-design, design, and post-design (pp. 43–59). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, Y., & Noguchi, H. (2004). An experimental study in the design thinking process started from difficult keywords-modelling the thinking process of creative design. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(4), 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, Y. & Taura, T. (2006). Formal description of conceptual synthesizing process for creative design. In J. Gero, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference. Design Computing and Cognition, (pp. 443–460).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, Y., & Taura, T. (2016). Studies of design creativity: A review and its prospects. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 95(4), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd revised ed.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. (1984). Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317–327). London, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (creativity research). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishers Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. London: Abex Oublishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Thinking styles. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taura, T. (Ed.). (2014). Principia designae pre-design, design, and post-design: Social motive for the highly advanced technological society. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2010). Design creativity 2010. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2013). Concept generation for design creativity: A systematized theory and methodology. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Hernandez, N., Shah, J. J., & Smith, S. M. (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies, 31(4), 382–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Creativity and the mind: Discovering the genius within. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 434–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukari Nagai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nagai, Y., Taura, T. (2017). Critical Issues of Advanced Design Thinking: Scheme of Synthesis, Realm of Out-Frame, Motive of Inner Sense, and Resonance to Future Society. In: Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Lubart, T. (eds) Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics