Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Multivariate Approach and Design of the Creative Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

Creativity is often described as an essential aspect of the innovative design process. As such, many authors have proposed models aiming to describe existing creative practices, both at the macro level—i.e. the stages involved in a creative process—and at the micro level—i.e. the underlying cognitive processes. Conversely, many other models are of a prescriptive nature: their goal is not to describe existing practices, but to structure them in order to help professionals deal with the uncertainty that is inherent to creativity. Whatever the type, such models aim to answer the following question: how can creative work be structured in order to ensure the optimal deployment of creative potential? The multivariate approach posits that creative behaviour is made possible by interactions between multiple resources including cognitive, conative, emotional and environmental factors. Like existing models, the multivariate approach has shown potential for both descriptive and prescriptive modelling of the creative process. In this chapter, we will review existing research on the multivariate approach of creativity. We will begin by describing the theoretical and methodological background of such models. We will then go on to describe some of the results obtained by multivariate modelling of the creative process in recent years. Finally, we describe some prospects for future research, specifically concerning prescriptive modelling—that is, the design of the creative process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost time and quality two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Creativity research in English-speaking countries. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 10–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2011). Assessing creativity in the classroom. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2016a). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016b). “Peaks, slumps, and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: Integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 76–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnardel, N. & Moscardini, L. (2012). Toward a situated cognition approach to design: Effect of emotional context on designers’ ideas. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botella, M., Glaveanu, V., Zenasni, F., Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Wolff, M., et al. (2013). How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botella, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2015). Alexithymia and affective intensity of fine artists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Inside technology (Vol. 25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(1952), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagle, M. (1985). A general abstract-concrete model of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(2), 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniellou, F. (2005). The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: Cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. L. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54(1), 12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2014). The impact of a creativity-supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1254–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). The nature of motion: Fundamental questions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2, 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class revisited (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A. (1977). Risky shift and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 5(2), 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, A. (1996). Creativity and the quantum: A unified theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. D., & Dorst, K. (2013). Design expertise (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., Weil, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2010). Strategic management of innovation and design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (1999). Componential models. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 295–300). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: past. Present and Future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., Besancon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). EPoC: Evaluation du Potentiel Créatif. Paris: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., & Guignard, J. H. (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité (1st ed.). Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, M.-A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaulley, M. H. (1990). The MBTI and individual pathways in engineering design. Engineering Education, 80(5), 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2(3), 213–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midler, C. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: The renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochse, R. E. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genuis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination. Oxford: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peilloux, A., & Botella, M. (2016). Ecological and dynamical study of the creative process and affects of scientific students working in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Oxford, UK: Inventors Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 657–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S.-T., Prior, S. D., White, A. S., & Karamanoglu, M. (2007). Using personality type differences to form engineering design teams. Engineering Education, 2(2), 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (Vol. 33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (1974). Stimulating creativity. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Componential models of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 226–230). London: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. A., Austin, G. D., & Sutton, D. F. (1974). A note on “instant creativity” at CPSI. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 8(3), 208–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms—technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test of creative thinking—drawing production. Frankfurt: Swets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfradt, U., Felfe, J., & Köster, T. (2002). Self-perceived emotional intelligence and creative personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 21(4), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. I. (2002). Effects of mood states on creativity. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Adaptations Travail Individu, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France

    Julien Nelson & Marion Botella

Authors
  1. Julien Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marion Botella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland

    Frédéric Darbellay

  2. University of Teacher Education Valais , Canton of Valais, Switzerland

    Zoe Moody

  3. LATI, Université Paris Descartes LATI, Paris, France

    Todd Lubart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nelson, J., Botella, M. (2017). The Multivariate Approach and Design of the Creative Process. In: Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Lubart, T. (eds) Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation