Abstract
This chapter explores the relationship of creativity, design, and transdisciplinarity, with emphasis on collaborative research. It sorts through definitions of the core terms in order to identify their intersections across discourses of transdisciplinarity. Outcomes differ from extending an existing approach to redirecting or reformulating it. Contexts likewise differ from product innovation to environmental problem solving. However, shared characteristics of novelty, boundary crossing, and generativity appear widely as well as synthesis, critique, and reflexivity. In the first of three examples—architecture and urban planning—transdisciplinary approaches are generating new hybrid modes of inquiry and action that are bridging gaps between critical theory and projective design and between practice and social, political, and normative concerns. Designerly ways of thinking are also leveraging creative dimensions of practice, fostering relational knowledge while being open to subjectivity and the unexpected. The second example—environmental sustainability—highlights heuristic thinking in an “ecological rationality” or “pragmatism” that fits a particular problem, rather than deriving from a generic method. Transdisciplinary problem solving is reimagined as a creative art of invention, accentuating discovery and learning. The third example—integrations of physical sciences and engineering with life sciences and medicine—is fostering creative development of alternative methods and protocols. A process of divergence–convergence is spinning off new uses through “combinatorial innovation.” The chapter closes by reflecting on an overriding topic that emerges from intersections of the core concepts—situated learning—then concludes by reflecting on the phenomenon of increased boundary crossing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
I thank Dena Fam, Tanzi Smith, and Dana Cordell for permission to use Fig. 4.1, from the chapter cited below. I also thank Rick Szostak and Frédéric Darbellay for comments on earlier versions of this chapter.
- 2.
Creativity. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/44075?redirectedFrom=creativity#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].
- 3.
Design. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/50840?rskey=v6MxwG&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].
- 4.
Heuristics. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/367823?redirectedFrom=heuristics#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].
References
Argyris, C. (1977, September). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 115–125.
American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2013). Arise 2: Unleashing America’s research & innovation enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Amercian Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.amacad.org/multimedia/pdfs/publications/researchpapersmonographs/arise2.pdf.
Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2011). Transdisciplinarity and new paradigm research. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 63–78). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Boradkar, P. (2010). Design as problem solving. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 273–287). Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design disciplines versus design science. Design Issues, 17(13), 49–55.
Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Sedooka, A., & Steffen, G. (2014). Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 1–10.
De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Dillon, P. (2006). Creativity, integrativism and a pedagogy of connection. Thinking skills and creativity, 1(2), 69–83.
Dillon, P. (2008). Creativity, integrativism, and a pedagogy of connection. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(3), 255–262.
Doucet, I., & Janssens, N. (2011). Editorial: Transdisciplinarity: The hybridization of knowledge production and space-related research. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Fam, D., Smith, T., & Cordell, D. (2017). Anatomy of a transdisciplinary researcher: From curiosity to connectedness. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Reidy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 77–92). London (UK): Routledge.
Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(1), 49–81.
Finke, R., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischer, M. (2015). Design it! Solving sustainability problems by applying design thinking. GAIA, 24(3), 174–178.
Fry, T. (2011). Getting over architecture: Thinking, surmounting, and redirecting. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 15–32). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Getzels, J. W., & Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1964). Creativity thinking in art students: An exploratory study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walter, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practices: cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.
Hall, T. E., & O’Rourke, M. (2014). Responding to communication challenges in transdisciplinary sustainability science. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 119–139). London (UK): Routledge.
Huutoniemi, K. (2014). Introduction: Sustainability, transdisciplinarity, and the complexity of knowing. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 1–20). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Huutoniemi, K., & Willamo, R. (2014). Thinking outward: Heuristics for systematic understanding of environmental problems. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 23–50). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Ito, J. (2016, 30 January). Can design advance science, and can science advance design? Retrieved from the interactive online journal Design and Science. https://www.pubpub.org/pub/designandscience.
Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 97–121). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Klein, J. T. (2015). Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future. Futures, 65, 10–16.
Klein, J. T. (2017). Transdisciplinarity and sustainability: Patterns of definition. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 7–22). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Koestler, A. (1964). The art of creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Lichnerowicz, A. (1972). Mathematic and transdisciplinarity. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 121–127). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Lozano, R. (2014). Creativity and organizational learning as means to foster sustainability. Sustainable Development, 22, 205–216.
Mitchell, C., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65, 6–96.
National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Transdisciplinary integration of life sciences physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 127–139). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Peirce, C. S. (1965). Collected papers. Harvard, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reilly, E. T. (2010). The four C’s: Executives say the 21st century requires more skilled workers. MWorld, 9(2), 47.
Rendell, J. (2004). Architectural research and disciplinarity. Architectural Research Quarterly, 8(2), 141–147.
Repko, A. F. (2006). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: The case for text-books. Issues in Integrative Studies, 24, 112–142.
Roco, M. C., Bainbridge, W. S., Toon, B. & Whitesides, G. (2013). Overview and recommendations. In M. C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge, B. Toon, & G. Whitesides, (Eds.), Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society: Beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies (pp. 7–32). Dordrecht, Netherland; Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY; London (UK): Springer.
Russel, A., Wickson, F., & Carew, A. (2008). Transdisciplinarity context, contradictions, and capacity. Futures, 40, 460–472.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London (UK): Arena.
Sill, D. J. (1996). Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies. The Journal of General Education, 45(1), 129–151.
Steiner, G. (2009). The concept of open creativity: Collaborative creative problem solving for innovation generation–a systems approach. Journal of Business and Management, 15(1), 5–33.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Ulmer, G. L. (1994). Heuretics: The logic of invention. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yajima, R. (2015). Catalyzing scientific innovation with design thinking. DMI Review, 26(1), 18–23.
Yaneva, A. (2011). From reflecting-in-action: Towards mapping of the real. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 117–128). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klein, J.T. (2017). Creativity, Design, and Transdisciplinarity. In: Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Lubart, T. (eds) Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7523-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7524-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)