Skip to main content

Creativity, Design, and Transdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship of creativity, design, and transdisciplinarity, with emphasis on collaborative research. It sorts through definitions of the core terms in order to identify their intersections across discourses of transdisciplinarity. Outcomes differ from extending an existing approach to redirecting or reformulating it. Contexts likewise differ from product innovation to environmental problem solving. However, shared characteristics of novelty, boundary crossing, and generativity appear widely as well as synthesis, critique, and reflexivity. In the first of three examples—architecture and urban planning—transdisciplinary approaches are generating new hybrid modes of inquiry and action that are bridging gaps between critical theory and projective design and between practice and social, political, and normative concerns. Designerly ways of thinking are also leveraging creative dimensions of practice, fostering relational knowledge while being open to subjectivity and the unexpected. The second example—environmental sustainability—highlights heuristic thinking in an “ecological rationality” or “pragmatism” that fits a particular problem, rather than deriving from a generic method. Transdisciplinary problem solving is reimagined as a creative art of invention, accentuating discovery and learning. The third example—integrations of physical sciences and engineering with life sciences and medicine—is fostering creative development of alternative methods and protocols. A process of divergence–convergence is spinning off new uses through “combinatorial innovation.” The chapter closes by reflecting on an overriding topic that emerges from intersections of the core concepts—situated learning—then concludes by reflecting on the phenomenon of increased boundary crossing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank Dena Fam, Tanzi Smith, and Dana Cordell for permission to use Fig. 4.1, from the chapter cited below. I also thank Rick Szostak and Frédéric Darbellay for comments on earlier versions of this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Creativity. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/44075?redirectedFrom=creativity#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].

  3. 3.

    Design. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/50840?rskey=v6MxwG&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].

  4. 4.

    Heuristics. (2016). In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/367823?redirectedFrom=heuristics#eid [Accessed 25 May 2016].

References

  • Argyris, C. (1977, September). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2013). Arise 2: Unleashing America’s research & innovation enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Amercian Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.amacad.org/multimedia/pdfs/publications/researchpapersmonographs/arise2.pdf.

  • Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2011). Transdisciplinarity and new paradigm research. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 63–78). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boradkar, P. (2010). Design as problem solving. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 273–287). Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design disciplines versus design science. Design Issues, 17(13), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Sedooka, A., & Steffen, G. (2014). Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, P. (2006). Creativity, integrativism and a pedagogy of connection. Thinking skills and creativity, 1(2), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, P. (2008). Creativity, integrativism, and a pedagogy of connection. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(3), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, I., & Janssens, N. (2011). Editorial: Transdisciplinarity: The hybridization of knowledge production and space-related research. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fam, D., Smith, T., & Cordell, D. (2017). Anatomy of a transdisciplinary researcher: From curiosity to connectedness. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Reidy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 77–92). London (UK): Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2010). The role of creativity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(1), 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. (2015). Design it! Solving sustainability problems by applying design thinking. GAIA, 24(3), 174–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. (2011). Getting over architecture: Thinking, surmounting, and redirecting. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 15–32). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1964). Creativity thinking in art students: An exploratory study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walter, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practices: cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. E., & O’Rourke, M. (2014). Responding to communication challenges in transdisciplinary sustainability science. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 119–139). London (UK): Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huutoniemi, K. (2014). Introduction: Sustainability, transdisciplinarity, and the complexity of knowing. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 1–20). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huutoniemi, K., & Willamo, R. (2014). Thinking outward: Heuristics for systematic understanding of environmental problems. In K. Huutoniemi & P. Tapio (Eds.), Transdisciplinary sustainability studies: A heuristic approach (pp. 23–50). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, J. (2016, 30 January). Can design advance science, and can science advance design? Retrieved from the interactive online journal Design and Science.  https://www.pubpub.org/pub/designandscience.

  • Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 97–121). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2015). Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future. Futures, 65, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2017). Transdisciplinarity and sustainability: Patterns of definition. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability (pp. 7–22). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The art of creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichnerowicz, A. (1972). Mathematic and transdisciplinarity. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 121–127). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, R. (2014). Creativity and organizational learning as means to foster sustainability. Sustainable Development, 22, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65, 6–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Transdisciplinary integration of life sciences physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 127–139). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1965). Collected papers. Harvard, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, E. T. (2010). The four C’s: Executives say the 21st century requires more skilled workers. MWorld, 9(2), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendell, J. (2004). Architectural research and disciplinarity. Architectural Research Quarterly, 8(2), 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A. F. (2006). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: The case for text-books. Issues in Integrative Studies, 24, 112–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C., Bainbridge, W. S., Toon, B. & Whitesides, G. (2013). Overview and recommendations. In M. C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge, B. Toon, & G. Whitesides, (Eds.), Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society: Beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies (pp. 7–32). Dordrecht, Netherland; Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY; London (UK): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, A., Wickson, F., & Carew, A. (2008). Transdisciplinarity context, contradictions, and capacity. Futures, 40, 460–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London (UK): Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sill, D. J. (1996). Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies. The Journal of General Education, 45(1), 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (2009). The concept of open creativity: Collaborative creative problem solving for innovation generation–a systems approach. Journal of Business and Management, 15(1), 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, G. L. (1994). Heuretics: The logic of invention. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yajima, R. (2015). Catalyzing scientific innovation with design thinking. DMI Review, 26(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaneva, A. (2011). From reflecting-in-action: Towards mapping of the real. In I. Doucet & N. Janssens (Eds.), Transdisciplinary knowledge production in architecture and urbanism: Towards hybrid modes of inquiry (pp. 117–128). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Thompson Klein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klein, J.T. (2017). Creativity, Design, and Transdisciplinarity. In: Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Lubart, T. (eds) Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics