Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary Research as a Creative Design Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

Lessons are drawn from the literature on creative design for the interdisciplinary research process. It is argued that the interdisciplinary research process is a creative design process. It follows a similar set of steps and can/should employ many of the same strategies. Both processes are thought to blend conscious and subconscious thinking. Interdisciplinary researchers who aspire to be more creative, and interdisciplinary instructors wishing to encourage creativity among students, are given advice on how to integrate creative practices into various steps in the interdisciplinary research process. Potential psychological, institutional, and skill-based barriers to creativity are addressed. Several strategies are outlined that are conducive to creativity in the early conscious information gathering/evaluation steps of the interdisciplinary research process. The costs and benefits of such strategies are discussed. Quite different strategies for encouraging creative subconscious integration of the information collected are then outlined. These integrative insights must then be consciously evaluated: It is important not to expect perfection but not to ignore potential side-effects. Perhaps most importantly it is argued that persuading others of the value of one’s comprehensive understanding is a critical component of the interdisciplinary research process, and that this step also requires the blending of conscious and subconscious processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (AIS). (2013). About interdisciplinarity. Available at: http://www.oakland.edu/ais.

  • Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W., Pohl, C., & Schramm, E. (2012). Methods for transdisciplinary research: A primer for practice. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T. (2010). The mindmap book. London: BBC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: The impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Sedooka, A., & Steffen, G. (2014). Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Prentky (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 525–531). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, E., & Flügge, G. (2014). Adult neuroplasticity: More than 40 years of research. Neural Plasticity, 5, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin, S., Olsson, L., & Denti, I. (2013). Creativity in R & D. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 508–521). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, N. (1992). Brain dominance and creativity. Paris: Retz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: The Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkner, J. (2011). Disciplined dreaming: A proven system to drive breakthrough creativity. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, M. (2011). 20 creative blocks and how to break through them [Ebook]. Wishful Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., & Mecca, J. (2013). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies and knowledge. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 249–264). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteur, L. (1854/1937). Oeuvres complètes réunies par M. Pasteur Vallery-Radot, Mélanges scientifiques et littéraires (Tome 7). Paris: Masson et Cie Editeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Korde, R. (2013). How to get the most creativity and innovation out of groups and teams. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 493–507). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A., & Szostak, R. (2016). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sill, D. J. (1996). Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies. Journal of General Education, 45(2), 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2013). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 69–83). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, M. (2004). Generating integration and complex understanding: Exploring the use of creative thinking tools within interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 22, 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., & López-Huertas, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary knowledge organization. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szostak, R. (2017). Stability, instability, and interdisciplinarity. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2010). Discussion on direction of design creativity research (Part 1)—New definition of design and creativity: Beyond the problem-solving paradigm. In T. Taura & Y. Nagai (Eds.), design creativity (pp. 3–8). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, J. (2007). The role of intuition in interdisciplinary insight. Issues in Integrative Studies, 25, 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y., & Siu, K. (2012). A model of creative design process for fostering creativity of students in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(4), 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Michelle Phillips Buchberger, Julie Thompson Klein, Bill Newell, Allen Repko, and James Welch IV for very helpful advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rick Szostak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Szostak, R. (2017). Interdisciplinary Research as a Creative Design Process. In: Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Lubart, T. (eds) Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics