Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretations of Relationships Among Knowledge Assessment Tests Outcomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 672))

  • 1882 Accesses

Abstract

Recently developed knowledge assessment tests provide students and educators with information about degrees to which certain skills are mastered, terms and concepts are understood, and to which extend abilities to solve predefined problems efficiently and in a timely fashion without difficulty are demonstrated. In case of partially correct or incorrect answers, students are suggested appropriate theory, examples, and possibilities to take new tests addressing those specific issues. Provided help is primarily related to a problem a student has not solved, a question not being answered correctly, or an answer has been omitted. In this work, we attempt to unveil hidden correlations among correct and wrong answers from students in a test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. G. Abay-Asmerom, R. H. Hammack, C. E. Larson, and D. T. Taylor, Direct Product Factorization of Bipartite Graphs with Bipartition-reversing Involutions, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 23(4), 2042–2052.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin, Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, Prentice Hall, (1993) pp. 461–509.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. L. Andrade, and G. L. Cizek, eds., Handbook of Formative Assessment. New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. S. Asgar and T. M. King, Formalizing Requirements in ERP Software Implementations, Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Bollobas: Extremal Graph Theory, Dover, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Bresar, W. Imrich, S. Klavar, and B. Zmazek, Hypercubes as direct products, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 18 (2005), pp. 778–786.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. C. Briggs, A. C. Alonzo, C., Schwab, and M. Wilson, Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple choice items, Educational Assessment, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Chang, and K. Tseng, Use and performances of Web-based portfolio assessment, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 40, No. 2, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felder, R.M., and Spurlin, J.: Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. Internation Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 2005, pp. 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Ganter and R. Wille, Formal Concept Analysis, Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hammack, On direct product cancellation of graphs, Discrete Math., 309 (2009), pp. 2538–2543.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Hammack, W. Imrich, S. Klavar, Handbook of Product Graphs, Second Edition, CRC Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Hammack, On uniqueness of prime bipartite factors of graphs, Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 313, Issue 9, 2013, pp. 1018–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Imrich and D. Rall, Finite and infinite hypercubes as direct products, Australas. J. Combin., 36 (2006), pp. 83–90.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos, Algorithm Design, Addison Wesley, (2006), pp. 94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. H. McMillan, Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practices for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. New York, NY: Pearson, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Rupp, J. Templin, and R. Henson, Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Sedgewick, Algorithms in Java, Part 5: Graph Algorithms (3rd ed.), Addison Wesley, (2004), pp. 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.-N. Tan, S. Michael, and V. Kumar: Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Xu, Theory and Application of Graphs, Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Zimmerman, and D. Schunk, eds., Handbook of Self-regulation of Learning and Performances. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, 8, Cambridge University Press, (1994) pp. 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bjørnsonsg. 45, 5528, Haugesund, Norway

    Sylvia Encheva

Authors
  1. Sylvia Encheva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Encheva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Vikrant Bhateja

  2. Technology and Engineering Division, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam

    Bao Le Nguyen

  3. Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam

    Nhu Gia Nguyen

  4. Department of CSE, PVP Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

    Suresh Chandra Satapathy

  5. Faculty of Information Technology , Hai Phong University, Hai Phong, Vietnam

    Dac-Nhuong Le

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Encheva, S. (2018). Interpretations of Relationships Among Knowledge Assessment Tests Outcomes. In: Bhateja, V., Nguyen, B., Nguyen, N., Satapathy, S., Le, DN. (eds) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 672. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7512-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7512-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7511-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7512-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation