Skip to main content

How Could We Be Non-Western? Some Ontological and Epistemological Ponderings on Chinese Tourism Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Asian Tourism ((PAT))

Abstract

Qualitative research in tourism studies has achieved significant popularity and has encouraged researchers to scrutinize their own ontological and epistemological concerns in their decisions on choosing how to go about their research projects and the research ethics they will adopt (Phillimore and Goodson 2004; Tribe et al. 2015; Wilson and Hollinshead 2015). One could say that the critical shifts in theories and methodologies in tourism studies are nurtured mostly through qualitative research, for such qualitative research aims to challenge the positivist paradigm which tends to take things for granted (Phillimore and Goodson 2004). Emerging from calls for non-positivist methodologies are the recent calls also for non-Western ontologies and epistemologies, aiming not only to provide alternative perspectives (other than the Eurocentric perspectives) in understanding tourism worldmaking but also to accommodate the “new tourists” from non-Western regions, in particular, Asia and China.

In this chapter, I attempt to problematize calls for alternative discourses in tourism studies, prompted by a concern from Chinese tourism researchers, especially those working outside of China, that is, “how to be non-Western and do non-Western research?” I argue that every Asian researcher who is interested in contributing to global knowledge would inevitably come to the questions of who we are as Asian researchers and what can we offer. To consider these questions critically, we need inwardly directed critique. Currently, there are two approaches regarding these questions: a decolonizing approach and a postcolonial approach. With some inwardly directed critique of my own, I argue that the decolonizing approach may risk further essentializing the binaries of the colonizer/colonized and the local/global, which are still within the discourse of imperialism. Looking at Chinese tourism studies and how these are positioned in the global scene, I have shown an ambiguous positioning that requires a more complex reading and that leads my arguing for a postcolonial approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms Western and non-Western are still used in this chapter, in the absence of a more appropriate vocabulary.

  2. 2.

    八股 is the original term for it.

  3. 3.

    中學為體,西學為用This is a phrase from Zhang Zhidong, an official in the late Qing Dynasty who advocated controlled reforms. The phrase is also translated sometimes as ‘Chinese learning for functional principles, and Western learning for practical application’.

  4. 4.

    One’s life has the whereabouts and one’s spirit has its entrustment.

References

  • Alatas, S. H. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: Definition, traits, and problems. Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alatas, F. S. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, C. (2011). Postcolonial tourism: Literature, culture, and environment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, J., Chen, G., & Ma, L. (2014). Tourism research in China: Insights from insiders. Annals of Tourism Research, 45, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D., & Buzinde, C. (2015). Tourism and decolonisation: Locating research and self. Annals of Tourism Research, 51, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.-m. (1995). Occidentalism: A theory of counter-discourse in Post-Mao China. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, R. (1997). Can one say no to China? New Literary History, 28(1), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, R. (2001). How (the) inscrutable Chinese led to globalized theory. PMLA, 116(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y.-W. (2008). The importance of being Chinese: Orientalism reconfigured in the age of global modernity. Boundary 2, 35(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659–2008-009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, A. (1996). Fuck Chineseness: On the ambiguities of ethnicity as culture as identity. Boundary 2, 23(2), 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Cohen, S. A. (2015). Beyond Eurocentrism in tourism: A paradigm shift to mobilities. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (1997). The postcolonial aura: Third World criticism in the age of global capitalism. Boulder/Colo: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (2003). Globalization, indigenism, and the politics of place. ARIEL, 34(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A. (2016). Freedom and belonging up in the air: Reconsidering the travel ideal with Jean-Luc Nancy. In G. Blackwood & A. McGregor (Eds.), Motion pictures: Travel ideals in film (pp. 109–134). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A., & Zhang, J. (2017, in press). Critical Tourism Studies and The World: On sense, praxis and creation. Tourism Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey, P. B. (Ed.). (1981). Chinese civilization and society: A sourcebook. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (1998). Tourist at the Taj: Performance and meaning at a symbolic site. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, K. (2001). The native tourist: Mass tourism within developing countries. Earthscan Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2002). Beyond global vs. local: Economic politics outside the binary frame. In A. Herod & M. W. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of power: Placing scale (pp. 25–60). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1993). Modernity—An incomplete project. In T. Docherty (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 98–109). New York/London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. D. Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., & Tucker, H. (2004). Tourism and postcolonialism: Contested discourses, identities and representations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, R. (1996). China’s Universities--1895–1995: A Century of Cultural Conflict. Garland Studies in Higher Education, Volume 4. Garland Reference Library of Social Science, (Vol. 997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazbun, W. (2009). Modernity on the beach: A postcolonial reading from southern shores. Tourist Studies, 9, 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, J. W. (2012). Nothing and nowhere East and West. Angelaki, 17(3), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinshead, K. (1998). Tourism, hybridity, and ambiguity: The relevance of Bhabha’s ‘third space’ cultures. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 121–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinshead, K. (2004a). Ontological craft in tourism studies: The productive mapping of identity and image in tourism settings. In J. Phillimore & L. Goodson (Eds.), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 83–101). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinshead, K. (2004b). Tourism and new sense: Worldmaking and the enunciative value of tourism. In C. M. Hall & H. Tucker (Eds.), Tourism and postcolonialism (pp. 25–42). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinshead, K., & Rukeya, S. (2017). Time for fluid acumen: A call for improved tourism studies dialogue with the decolonizing world. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 17, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. (2014). 中国旅游研究的“视野”与“视角” vision and perspective of China’s tourism studies. Tourism Tribune, 29(1), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.01.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., & Chen, G. (2016). Current state of tourism research in China. Tourism Management Perspectives, 20, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., Van Der Veen, R., & Zhang, G. (2014). New Era of China Tourism Research. Journal of China Tourism Research, 10(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2014.952909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R. K., & Cakmak, E. (2017). Exploring the role of science and power relations in tourism studies: An introduction to the special issue. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 17, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, G. R. (2009). Methodologies and methods. In T. Jamal & M. Robinson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of tourism studies (pp. 672–692). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. T., Scarles, C., & Cohen, S. A. (2015). A multisensory phenomenology of interrail mobilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 53, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, H. (2005). From “Philosophy” to “Chinese Philosophy”: Prelimiary thoughts in a postcolonial linguistic context. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 37(1), 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G. G., Reddy, V., & Searle-Chatterjee, M. (1990). Eurocentrism in the social sciences. Race & Class, 31(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/030639689003100401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean, G., Staiff, R., & Waterton, E. (2014). Travel and imagination. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, A. A. (2014). 全球化视野下的中国旅游研究 Globalizing China’s Tourism Scholarship. 旅游学刊, 29 (1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.01.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2005). A thousand years of good prayers: Stories. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Jaramillo, N. E. (2012). Foreword: Dialectical thinking and critical pedagogy – Towards a critical tourism studies. In I. Ateljevic, N. Morgan, & A. Pritchard (Eds.), The critical turn in tourism studies: Creating an academy of hope. Milton Park/Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mura, P., & Sharif, S. P. (2015). The crisis of the ‘crisis of representation’ – mapping qualitative tourism research in Southeast Asia. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(9), 828–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1045459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore, J., & Goodson, L. (Eds.). (2004). Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A., & Morgan, N. (2007). De-centering tourism’s intellectual universe, or traversing the dialogue between change and tradition. In I. Ateljevic, A. Pritchard, & N. Morgan (Eds.), The critical turn in tourism studies: Innovative research methodologies (pp. 11–28). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C., & Huang, S. S. (2013). Chinese tourism research: An international perspective. In C. Ryan & S. Huang (Eds.), Tourism in China: Destinations, planning and experiences (pp. 304–315). Bristol: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarles, C. (2010). Where words fail, visuals ignite. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 905–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. (2012). Positioning Asia in a Global Future? An Example through Rethinking Finance. Positions, 20(1), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J. (2006). The truth about tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 360–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J., Xiao, H., & Chambers, D. (2012). The reflexive journal: Inside the black box. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, J., Dann, G., & Jamal, T. (2015). Paradigms in tourism research: A trialogue. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2015.1008856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H. (2014). Developing reflective qualitative research skills among young Chinese researchers, December 9th – 13th. Paper presented at the The New Zealand Tourism and Hospitality Research Conference. Hamilton, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H. (2017). Contaminated Tourism: On pissed off-ness, passion and hope. Paper presented at the Critical tourism studies VII conference. 25–29 June, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H., & Akama, J. (2009). Tourism as postcolonialism. In T. Jamal & M. Robinson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of tourism studies (pp. 504–520). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H., & Zhang, J. (2016). On Western-centrism and “Chineseness” in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 250–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, G. (2014). China tourism research in a Tourism scholar’s eyes. Tourism Tribune, 29(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. (1997). Orientalism versus occidentalism? New Literary History, 28(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2004). The rise of modern Chinese thought. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2009). The end of the revolution: China and the limits of modernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X. (2014). 顶天立地关于旅游研究的思考 (Standing straight: Some thoughts on tourism studies). Tourism Tribune, 29(1), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.01.001

  • Wilson, E., & Hollinshead, K. (2015). Qualitative tourism research: Opportunities in the emergent soft sciences. Annals of Tourism Research, 54, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. (2007). Rethinking tourism in Asia. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. (2009). Asian tourism and the retreat of anglo-western centrism in tourism theory. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, H. (2016). A Humanities Wanderer “Lost” in Tourism Studies: A critical reflection. Journal of China Tourism Research, 12(1), 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, S. (1997). Rethinking the Problem of Postcolonialism. New Literary History, 28(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C.-C. (1989). The role of the intellectual in China. Third World Quarterly, 11(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598908420162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. (2014). 国际旅游研究的转向与中国青年旅游学者的使命和责任 (Shifts in international tourism studies and the responsibilities of Chinese young tourism researchers). Tourism Tribune, 29(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.01.001.

  • Zhang, C. (2017). Qualitative research expressions in tourism: Principles and reflections on a meta-analysis of papers published in Tourism Tribune (2000–2013). Tourism Tribune, 32(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.01.014.

  • Zhang, J. (2007). The irreducible ethics in reflexivity: Rethinking reflexivity in conducting ethnography in Shangri-La, Southwest China. Tourism Culture & Communication, 17(1), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2014). 理论的贫困:旅游学术研究的“规范”与“创新” (Poverty of theory: Regulation and innovation in tourism studies). Tourism Tribune, 29(1), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2014.01.001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jundan (Jasmine) Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, J.(. (2018). How Could We Be Non-Western? Some Ontological and Epistemological Ponderings on Chinese Tourism Research. In: Mura, P., Khoo-Lattimore, C. (eds) Asian Qualitative Research in Tourism. Perspectives on Asian Tourism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics