Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of ECC and RSA for Securing CoAP-Based Remote Health Monitoring System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Communications and Computer Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 696))

Abstract

Internet of Things has become a vital component in diverse applications essentially smart cities, automated transportation, environmental monitoring, and many more. With the increased dependency on IoT and its association with the current Internet, efficiency and security have become essentials to guarantee the correct behavior of IoT devices or nodes in the network. This paper focuses on enhancing the security of data, gathered from remote health monitoring of patients using CoAP. The security in such sensor network can be ensured using asymmetric cryptography techniques. The public key algorithms such as ECC and RSA have been implemented for ensuring confidentiality, integrity in sensor network, and authorization between patient nodes and client. The work also compares these algorithms on parameters such as time consumption in generating keys along with signature generation and verification of ECC and RSA algorithms, energy consumption, and other factors such as average power consumption, radio duty cycle, to check their compatibility in constrained environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Stankovic, “Research directions for the internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Lopez, D. Fernandez, A. J. Jara and A. F. Skarmeta, “Survey of internet of things technologies for clinical environments,” in Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2013 27th International Conference On, 2013, pp. 1349–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pandesswaran, Surender and Karthik KV, “Remote Patient Monitoring System Based CoAP in Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Sensor Networks and Data communications 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Periklis Chatzimisios, Francisco Vazquez-Gallego, Vasileios Karagiannis, Jesus Alonso-Zarate,“A Survey on Application Layer Protocols for the Internet of Things”, Transaction on IoT and Cloud Computing, At 1, Volume: 3, September 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muneer Bani Yassein, Mohammed Q. Shatnawi, Dua’ Al-zoubi, “Application Layer Protocols for the Internet of Things: A survey”, IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and Pervasive Systems, At 22–24 September 2016, Agadir, Morocco.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jorge Granjal, Edmundo Monteiro, and Jorge Sa Silva, “Security for the Internet of Things: A Survey of Existing Protocols and Open Research Issues”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, VOL. 17, NO. 3, THIRD QUARTER,2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thamer A. Alghamdi, Aboubaker Lasebae, Mahdi Aiash, “Security Analysis of the Constrained Application Protocol in the Internet of Things,” Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technology (FGCT), 12–14 Nov. 2013, pp. 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reem Abdul Rahman, Babar Shah, “Security analysis of IoT protocols: A focus in CoAP”, 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC), 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aarthi R, Renold AR, “CoAP Based Acute Parking Lot Monitoring System Using Sensor Networks”, ICTACT J Communication Technology, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovatsch M, “CoAP for the web of things: from tiny resource-constrained devices to the web browser”, Proceedings of ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication. ACM pp: 1495–1504, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Catarinucci L, Donno DD, Palano L, “ An IoT-Aware Architecture for Smart Healthcare Systems”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2: 515–526, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Venkateswarlu Sunkari et al “Framework for Providing Security and Energy saving Using Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Wireless Sensor Networks”, (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (4), 2015, 3604–3608.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.P Haripriya, Kulothungan Kanagasabai, “ECC based self-certified key management scheme for mutual authentication in Internet of Things”, International Conference on Emerging Technological Trends (ICETT), 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. SenthilKumaran, M.K. Nallakaruppan, M. SenthilKumar, “Review of Asymmetric Key Cryptography in Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Velinov, A. Mileva, “Running and Testing Applications for Contiki OS Using Cooja Simulator”, International Conference on Information Technology and Development of Education – ITRO 2016 June, 2016. Zrenjanin, Republic of Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anuj Sehgal. Using the contiki cooja simulator. Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen Campus Ring, 1:28759, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohsen Bafandehkar, Sharifah Md Yasin, Ramlan Mahmod, Zurina Mohd Hanapi “Comparison of ECC and RSA in Resource Constrained Devices”, IEEE International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS), 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. M. Riazul Islam, Daehan Kwak, et.al. “The Internet of Things for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey, 2169–3536 2015 IEEE. VOL 3, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheena Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, C., Sunanda (2018). Performance Analysis of ECC and RSA for Securing CoAP-Based Remote Health Monitoring System. In: Perez, G., Tiwari, S., Trivedi, M., Mishra, K. (eds) Ambient Communications and Computer Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 696. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7386-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7386-1_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7385-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7386-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics