Making Social Networks Visible: Shared Awareness Among Stakeholders on Groundwater Resources

Chapter
Part of the Global Environmental Studies book series (GENVST)

Abstract

In the sustainable use of groundwater resources, there is a need for smooth governance by stakeholders. Local communities use groundwater resources for a variety of purposes and many different stakeholders are involved, making it difficult to get an overall idea of how groundwater is being used. The purpose of this study is to use social network analysis (SNA) to visualize differences in latent talking point that exist among stakeholders of groundwater resources to structurally understand the potential relationship between the stakeholders of groundwater resources of Obama City, Fukui Prefecture. Results show that stakeholders come to a shared understanding regarding general issues such as “necessity of conservation”, “maintaining current usage level”, “sanitation”, among others. However, the stakeholders do not have a shared understanding regarding specific issues such as “salinization”, “temperature”, and “natural flow”. From a nexus perspective, groundwater is used for various purposes. The fact that concrete issues are not shared between stakeholders with different uses is considered to be a potential conflict.

Keywords

Social network analysis Obama city Groundwater resources Stakeholders Groundwater resource potential problems 

References

  1. Baba K, Matsuura M, Taniguchi M (2015) Effectiveness and challenges of stakeholder analysis in co-design and co-product of science and society: implications from a case study of identifying potential issues on utilization of groundwater resource in Obama. Environmental. Science 28(4):304–315Google Scholar
  2. de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2011a) Exploratory social network analysis with pajek second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 118–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2011b) Exploratory social network analysis with pajek, second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 124–125Google Scholar
  4. Suzuki T (2009a) Network analysis. Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, pp 86–87Google Scholar
  5. Suzuki T (2009b) Network analysis, vol 2. Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, pp 91–94Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lake Biwa Environmental Research InstituteOtsuJapan
  2. 2.Research Institute of Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Tokyo City UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations