Skip to main content

Resilience-Based Approaches and Public Policy: Operational Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Nexus of Resilience and Public Policy in a Modern Risk Society

Abstract

This chapter focuses on operational perspectives in structuring resilience-based approaches and public policy to operationalize resilience. Specifically, this chapter provides a framework for resilience-based approaches from operational perspectives, by examining multi-faceted resilience concepts, studies, and relevant case examples from operational views. Thus, this chapter outlines how a team of individuals can engage in, enhance, or create resilience in communities, organizations, or institutions by tailoring to their own contexts and by taking into account the appropriate scale for programs or projects. Specifically, the framework outlines how to incorporate resilience into projects or programs and how to foster co-production of knowledge for problem-solving in a modern risk society in order to form and function resilience-based public policy. As specified in Chap. 2, given the multi-scalability of resilience concepts, the framework is broadly situated by providing 1) a foundation for resilience-based approaches from operational views based on existing studies, and 2) a framework and practices for resilience-based approaches with principles and operational lenses/components. Following the presentation of the framework, this chapter provides 3) relevant case examples, 4) application of the framework to programs and projects, and 5) policy implication for resilience-based public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., et al. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra, 19(4), 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. R., & Handmer, J. W. (1992). Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change, 2(4), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R. (1996). A typology of resilience: Rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9(4), 482–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2010). Architecting resilient systems: Accident avoidance and survival and recovery from disruptions. USA: Wiley.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, J. J., Sheley, R. L., Erickson, T., Rollins, K. S., Taylor, M. H., & Dixon, K. W. (2013). A systems approaches to restoring degraded drylands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(3), 730–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (2013). Risk and resilience: From good idea to good practice. WP 13/2013. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dac/conflict-fragility-resilience/docs/FINAL%20WP%2013%20Resilience%20and%20Risk.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2017.

  • NHK Special Reporters. (2016). Shindo 7: Naniga Seishi wo Waketanoka (Earthquake Shake 7: What distinguished between life and death) (in Japanese) KK Best sellers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, K. (2012). Biodiversity in the context of ecosystem services: The applied need for systems approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1586), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S. (1969). The systems approaches and public policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, M. (2013). Resilience in disaster risk management and public policy: A case study of the Tohoku disaster. Risks, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 3(4), 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mika Shimizu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shimizu, M., L. Clark, A. (2019). Resilience-Based Approaches and Public Policy: Operational Views. In: Nexus of Resilience and Public Policy in a Modern Risk Society. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7362-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics