Skip to main content

Shale Gas: A Futuristic Non-conventional Energy Resource

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Low Carbon Energy Supply

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Global energy security is a major goal for rapid industrial progress. However, meeting the demand of energy and continuing the pace of industrial growth in future would depend on the sustainable economic development and simultaneously addressing the global climate change concerns. It is, therefore, necessary that alternate energy sources with reduced environmental footprints are discovered and developed on a commercial scale. In this scenario, shale gas could clearly be a “game-changing” resource that could transform the global energy market and contribute significantly to the national energy security of different countries. Various countries are considering the shale gas as a means to strengthen their energy security as well as an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the unconventional shale gas is present in low permeable rock formations. The extraction and production of shale gas as an economically profitable venture had so far, been difficult, with only the United States exploiting it at large scale. With the innovations in technology, and continuous improvements and advancements in production techniques such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, shale gas is emerging as an attractive futuristic source of energy. The advanced technology has, therefore, made it possible to explore the shale reserves and its commercial extraction safe. Nonetheless, the worldwide development of shale gas-based energy production units would depend on collaboration and cooperation among different countries. The stakeholders having common energy goals can harness this futuristic energy resource after formulating a comprehensive framework that addresses various social, legal, environmental, geophysical, engineering, and technological challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Nakhli AR, Abass HH, Al-Ajwad HA, Kwak HT, Al-Harith AM, Al-Otaibi A (2013) Unconventional gas stimulation by creating synthetic sweetspot. In: SPE unconventional gas conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Muscat, Oman

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur JD, Bohm B, Coughlin BJ, Layne M (2008) Hydraulic fracturing considerations for natural gas wells of the fayetteville shale. In ALL Consulting: Tulsa, OK, US. https://steinlevy.com/files/20120606155241-NYLJ%20Reprint.pdf. Accessed on 18th Feb 2018

  • Bond CE, Roberts J, Hastings A, Shipton ZK, João EM, Kyzy JT, Stephenson M (2014) Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas in Scotland. ClimateXChange, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • BP p.l.c (2012) Unconventional gas and hydraulic fracturing: issue briefing. BP p.l.c., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham MC, Maloney KO, Farag AM, Harper DD, Bowen ZH (2014) Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. Environ Sci Policy 48:11034–11047

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Liu X, Christie P (2012) Emerging shale gas revolution in China. Environ Sci Technol 46:12281–12282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Sharma RK, Keay J, Marfurt KJ (2012) Shale gas reservoir characterization workflows. In: SEG Las Vegas 2012 annual meeting, Las Vegas, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Close D, Perez M, Goodway B, Purdue G (2012) Integrated workflows for shale gas and case study results for the Horn River basin, British Columbia, Canada. Lead Edge 31(5):556–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke D (2012) A brief review of geoscience issues associated with shale gas development in Australia. University of Adelaide/Australian School of Petroleum, and ZDAC Geophysical Technologies, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Stamford L, Azapagic A (2016) Shale gas: a review of the economic, environmental, and social sustainability. Energy Technol 4:772–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis JB (2002) Fractured shale gas systems. AAPG Bull 86:1921–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Wang X (2015) Research status of shale gas evaluation methods. IOSRJEN 5(6):52–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Duey R (2012) Geophysics has a role in shale plays. In: Center for wave phenomena. Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, US

    Google Scholar 

  • East LE Jr, Grieser W, McDaniel BW, Johnson B, Jackson R, Fisher K (2004) Successful application of hydrajet fracturing on horizontal wells completed in a thick shale reservoir. In: SPE eastern regional meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Charleston, West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandossi L, Estorff UV (2015) An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production. Joint Research Centre: European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm D (2011) Shale gas and the low carbon transition in Europe. demosEUROPA–Centre for European Strategy: Warsaw, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A (2011) Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change 106:679–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • https://www.thomaswhite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/img-shale-gas-the-fuel-for-future.jpg. Accessed on 18th Feb 2018

  • Huang B, Liu C, Fu J, Guan H (2011) Hydraulic fracturing after water pressure control blasting for increased fracturing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(6):976–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löhr SC, Baruch ET, Hall PA, Kennedy MJ (2015) Is organic pore development in gas shales influenced by the primary porosity and structure of thermally immature organic matter? Org Geochem 87:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay DJC, Stone TJ (2013) Potential greenhouse gas emissions associated with shale gas extraction and use. In: Department of energy & climate change, G. O. UK., Ed. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty KK, Gaurav A, Gu M (2012) Improvement of fracturing for gas shales 07122-38 FINAL, Austin, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • NSCEP (2004) Evaluation of impacts to underground sources of drinking water by hydraulic fracturing of coaled methane reservoirs. In: N. S. C. f. E. P., Ed. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm BG, Riha SJ (2012) Toward strategic management of shale gas development: Regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy 17:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reig P, Luo T, Proctor JN (2014) Global shale gas development: water availability and business risks. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer DL, Chavez LHA, Ben-Sasson M, Castrillón SR-V, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47:9569–9583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamford L, Azapagic A (2014) Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas. Appl Energy 134:506–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Sepehrnoori K (2013) Optimization of multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in unconventional gas reservoirs. J Pet Eng 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Jin S, Jiang H, Wang Y, Jia P (2015) Review of well logs and petrophysical approaches for shale gas in Sichuan Basin, China. Open Pet Eng J 8(Suppl 1: M9):316–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Liu E, Martinez A, Payne MA, Harris CE (2011) Understanding geophysical responses of shale-gas plays. Lead Edge 30(3):332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunjan Kumar Agrahari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Agrahari, G.K., Agrahari, S. (2018). Shale Gas: A Futuristic Non-conventional Energy Resource. In: Sharma, A., Shukla, A., Aye, L. (eds) Low Carbon Energy Supply. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7326-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7326-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7325-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7326-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics