Abstract
Global energy security is a major goal for rapid industrial progress. However, meeting the demand of energy and continuing the pace of industrial growth in future would depend on the sustainable economic development and simultaneously addressing the global climate change concerns. It is, therefore, necessary that alternate energy sources with reduced environmental footprints are discovered and developed on a commercial scale. In this scenario, shale gas could clearly be a “game-changing” resource that could transform the global energy market and contribute significantly to the national energy security of different countries. Various countries are considering the shale gas as a means to strengthen their energy security as well as an opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the unconventional shale gas is present in low permeable rock formations. The extraction and production of shale gas as an economically profitable venture had so far, been difficult, with only the United States exploiting it at large scale. With the innovations in technology, and continuous improvements and advancements in production techniques such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, shale gas is emerging as an attractive futuristic source of energy. The advanced technology has, therefore, made it possible to explore the shale reserves and its commercial extraction safe. Nonetheless, the worldwide development of shale gas-based energy production units would depend on collaboration and cooperation among different countries. The stakeholders having common energy goals can harness this futuristic energy resource after formulating a comprehensive framework that addresses various social, legal, environmental, geophysical, engineering, and technological challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Nakhli AR, Abass HH, Al-Ajwad HA, Kwak HT, Al-Harith AM, Al-Otaibi A (2013) Unconventional gas stimulation by creating synthetic sweetspot. In: SPE unconventional gas conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Muscat, Oman
Arthur JD, Bohm B, Coughlin BJ, Layne M (2008) Hydraulic fracturing considerations for natural gas wells of the fayetteville shale. In ALL Consulting: Tulsa, OK, US. https://steinlevy.com/files/20120606155241-NYLJ%20Reprint.pdf. Accessed on 18th Feb 2018
Bond CE, Roberts J, Hastings A, Shipton ZK, João EM, Kyzy JT, Stephenson M (2014) Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas in Scotland. ClimateXChange, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
BP p.l.c (2012) Unconventional gas and hydraulic fracturing: issue briefing. BP p.l.c., London
Brittingham MC, Maloney KO, Farag AM, Harper DD, Bowen ZH (2014) Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. Environ Sci Policy 48:11034–11047
Chang Y, Liu X, Christie P (2012) Emerging shale gas revolution in China. Environ Sci Technol 46:12281–12282
Chopra S, Sharma RK, Keay J, Marfurt KJ (2012) Shale gas reservoir characterization workflows. In: SEG Las Vegas 2012 annual meeting, Las Vegas, US
Close D, Perez M, Goodway B, Purdue G (2012) Integrated workflows for shale gas and case study results for the Horn River basin, British Columbia, Canada. Lead Edge 31(5):556–569
Cooke D (2012) A brief review of geoscience issues associated with shale gas development in Australia. University of Adelaide/Australian School of Petroleum, and ZDAC Geophysical Technologies, Australia
Cooper J, Stamford L, Azapagic A (2016) Shale gas: a review of the economic, environmental, and social sustainability. Energy Technol 4:772–792
Curtis JB (2002) Fractured shale gas systems. AAPG Bull 86:1921–1938
Deng X, Wang X (2015) Research status of shale gas evaluation methods. IOSRJEN 5(6):52–54
Duey R (2012) Geophysics has a role in shale plays. In: Center for wave phenomena. Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, US
East LE Jr, Grieser W, McDaniel BW, Johnson B, Jackson R, Fisher K (2004) Successful application of hydrajet fracturing on horizontal wells completed in a thick shale reservoir. In: SPE eastern regional meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Charleston, West Virginia
Gandossi L, Estorff UV (2015) An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production. Joint Research Centre: European Union
Helm D (2011) Shale gas and the low carbon transition in Europe. demosEUROPA–Centre for European Strategy: Warsaw, Poland
Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A (2011) Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change 106:679–690
https://www.thomaswhite.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/img-shale-gas-the-fuel-for-future.jpg. Accessed on 18th Feb 2018
Huang B, Liu C, Fu J, Guan H (2011) Hydraulic fracturing after water pressure control blasting for increased fracturing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(6):976–983
Löhr SC, Baruch ET, Hall PA, Kennedy MJ (2015) Is organic pore development in gas shales influenced by the primary porosity and structure of thermally immature organic matter? Org Geochem 87:119–132
MacKay DJC, Stone TJ (2013) Potential greenhouse gas emissions associated with shale gas extraction and use. In: Department of energy & climate change, G. O. UK., Ed. London
Mohanty KK, Gaurav A, Gu M (2012) Improvement of fracturing for gas shales 07122-38 FINAL, Austin, Texas
NSCEP (2004) Evaluation of impacts to underground sources of drinking water by hydraulic fracturing of coaled methane reservoirs. In: N. S. C. f. E. P., Ed. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Rahm BG, Riha SJ (2012) Toward strategic management of shale gas development: Regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy 17:12–23
Reig P, Luo T, Proctor JN (2014) Global shale gas development: water availability and business risks. Washington, DC, USA
Shaffer DL, Chavez LHA, Ben-Sasson M, Castrillón SR-V, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47:9569–9583
Stamford L, Azapagic A (2014) Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas. Appl Energy 134:506–518
Yu W, Sepehrnoori K (2013) Optimization of multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in unconventional gas reservoirs. J Pet Eng 1–16
Zhang Y, Jin S, Jiang H, Wang Y, Jia P (2015) Review of well logs and petrophysical approaches for shale gas in Sichuan Basin, China. Open Pet Eng J 8(Suppl 1: M9):316–324
Zhu Y, Liu E, Martinez A, Payne MA, Harris CE (2011) Understanding geophysical responses of shale-gas plays. Lead Edge 30(3):332–338
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agrahari, G.K., Agrahari, S. (2018). Shale Gas: A Futuristic Non-conventional Energy Resource. In: Sharma, A., Shukla, A., Aye, L. (eds) Low Carbon Energy Supply. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7326-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7326-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7325-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7326-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)