Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Enabling Eco-Cities pp 65–87Cite as

Niches: Small-Scale Interventions or Radical Innovations to Build Up Internal Momentum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Niches act as small-scale interventions or radical innovations to build up internal momentum, which may lead to bottom-up change, or encourage major shifts within a system. Focusing on the niche experience offers a different way to understand and plan for eco-cities. This chapter offers an alternative approach to investigate eco-cities through niche interventions in the built environment. This is achieved by combining the fields of urban planning, resilience studies and sustainability transitions. In particular, panarchy from resilience studies and the s-curve and the multi-level perspective framework from sustainability transitions are brought together to explore changes within the built environment. This approach shows that incremental change is built from the existing system, and highlights the importance of timescales and pathways when planning for eco-cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahren, Jack. 2011. From Fail-Safe to Safe-to-Fail: Sustainability and Resilience in the New Urban World. Landscape and Urban Planning 100: 341–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, Jack F. 2013. Urban Landscape Sustainability and Resilience: The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Ecology with Urban Planning and Design. Landscape Ecology 28 (6): 1203–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, Marnia, John M. Marzluff, Eric Shulenberger, Gordon Bradley, Clare Ryan, and Craig Zumbrunnen. 2003. Integrating Human Into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems. BioScience 53 (12): 1169–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, Philip. 2002. Planning Theory. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avelino, Flor, and Jan Rotmans. 2009. Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change. European Journal of Social Theory 12 (4): 543–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, Fikret, and Carl Folke. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berstein, Steven, and Matthew Hoffman. 2015. The Politics of Decarbonization: A Framework and Method. Toronto: Environmental Governance Lab, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, Michelle, and Harriet Bulkeley. 2007. Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research. Local Environment 12 (5): 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyninckx, Herman. 2015. Sustainability Transitions and EU Policy. Presented at International Sustainability Transitions Conference 2015, Sustainability Transitions Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Stephen R., Frances Westley, and Monica G. Turner. 2005. Surrogates for Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems. Ecosystems 8 (8): 941–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castán Broto, Vaness, and Harriet Bulkeley. 2013. A Survey of Urban Climate Change Experiments in 100 Cities. Global Environmental Change 23 (1): 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Vancouver. 1996. Live/Work and Work/Live: Vancouver Overview Including Strategic Directions. Vancouver, BC: City of Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J. 2013. Towards Next-Generation Urban Resilience in Planning Practice: From Securitization to Integrated Place Making. Planning Practice and Research 28 (3): 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, Lars, and Bernard Truffer. 2012. Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field. European Planning Studies 20 (3): 367–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Marcus J., Zorica Nedović-Budić, Jeron Aerts, Stuart Connop, Dermot Foley, Karen Foley, Darryl Newport, Siobhan McQuaid, Aleksander Slaev, and Peter Verburg. 2013. Transitioning to Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Communities. Cities 32: 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, Simin, and Ian Strange. 2009. Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, Simin, and John Pendlebury. 2010. Centenary Paper: The Evolution of Planning as an Academic Discipline. Town Planning Review 81 (6): 613–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, Simin. 2012. Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End?“Reframing”. Planning Theory and Practice 13 (2): 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, Simin, Elizabeth Brooks, and Abid Mehmood. 2013. Evolutionary Resilience and Strategies for Climate Adaptation. Planning, Practice and Research 28 (3): 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denyer-Green, Barry, and Navjit Ubhi. 2012. Development and Planning Law. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyon, Andréanne. 2017. Emerging Theoretical Space: Urban Planning and Sustainability Transitions. In Urban Sustainability Transitions: Australian Cases—International Perspectives, ed. Trivess Moore, Fjalar J. de Haan, Ralph Horne, and Brendan J. Gleeson. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis, Chrisna. 2009. An Approach to Studying Urban Sustainability from within an Ecological Worldview. Doctoral thesis, University of Salford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, Thomas, Guy Barnett, and Cathy Wilkinson. 2014. Exploring Urban Sustainability and Resilience. In Resilient Sustainable Cities: A Future, ed. Peter Roberts, Peter Newton, and Leonie Pearson, 19–28. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, Susan, and Scott Campbell. 2003. Readings in Planning Theory. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Readings in Planning Theory. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, Carl, Stephen R. Carpenter, Brian Walker, Marten Scheffer, Terry Chapin, and Johan Rockstörn. 2010. Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4): 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, Timothy J., Mark S. Reed, and Lindsay C. Stringer. 2009. Governing Long-Term Social-Ecological Change: What Can the Adaptive Management and Transition Management Approaches Learn from Each Other? Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Actions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (4): 482–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, Gilberto C., Silvio Funtowicz, O’Conner Martin, and Jerry Ravetz. 2001. Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core. International Social Science Journal 53 (168): 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. 2002. Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study. Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W., and Rob Raven. 2006. Non-Linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W., and Johan Schot. 2007. Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. 2014. Regime Resistance Against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture and Society 31 (5): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, John, Jan Rotmans, and Johan Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, Lamce H., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. New York: EandFN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Perter, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2011. Urban and Regional Planning. 5th ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Teis, and Lars Coenen. 2015. The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, Patsy. 2010. In Search of the “Strategic” in Spatial Strategy Making. Planning Theory & Practice 10 (4): 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Traditions of Planning Thought. In Readings in Planning Theory, ed. Susan Fainstein and Scott Campbell. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Mike, and Simon Marvin. 2009. Cities Mediating Technological Transitions: Understanding Visions, Intermediation and Consequences. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21 (4): 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Can Cities Shape Socio-Technical Transitions and How Would Know if They Were? Research Policy 39: 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogma, Remco, Rene Kemp, Johan Schot, and Bernard Truffer. 2002. Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Management. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerneck, Anne, and Lennart Olsson. 2008. Adaptation and the Poor: Development, Resilience and Transition. Climate Policy 8 (2): 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Rene, Arie Rip, and Johan Schot. 2001. Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches. In Path Dependence and Creation, ed. Raghu Garud and Peter Karnøe, 269–299. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko, Robin. 2011. Climate Change and Urban Resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3 (3): 164–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, Derk, and Jan Rotmans. 2010. The Practice of Transition Management: Examples and Lessons from Four Distinct Cases. Futures 42 (3): 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, Nicholas, Brendan Gleeson, and Darko Radovic. 2005. The Green City, Sustainable Homes, Sustainable Suburbs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, Jochen, and Bernard Truffer. 2008. Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-Level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework. Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, Jochen, Rob Raven, and Bernard Truffer. 2012. Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, James. 2009. What About the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions. Policy Sciences 42 (4): 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, Sara, Joshua P. Newell, and Melissa Stults. 2016. Defining Urban Resilience: A Review. Landscape and Urban Planning 147: 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Peter, and Isabella Jennings. 2008. Cities and Sustainable Ecosystems: Principals and Practices. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, Per, Victor Galaz, and Wiebren J. Boonstra. 2014. Sustainability Transformations: A Resilience Perspective. Ecology and Society 19 (4): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, Mark, and David Manuel-Navarrete. 2011. From Resilience to Transformation: Adaptive Cycle in Two Mexican Urban Centers. Ecology and Society 16 (2): 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Cameren, and Mark Swilling. 2014. Linking Complexity and Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modelling Sustainability Transitions. Sustainability 6 (3): 1594–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, Steward T.A., Mary L. Cadenasso, and Tracy L. Benning. 2003. Biotic and Abiotic Variability as Key Determinants of Savannah Heterogeneity at Multiple Spatiotemporal Scales. In The Kruger Experience: Ecology Management of Savannah Heterogeneity, ed. Johan T. Du Toit, Kevin H. Rogers, and Harry C. Biggs, 22–40. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, Stuart L. 1991. The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Libby, and Simin Davoudi. 2012. The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note. Planning Theory and Practice 13 (2): 329–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, Rob Raven, Suzanne van Der Bosch, and Rob Waterings. 2010. Transitions and Strategic Niche Management: Towards a Competence Kit for Practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management 51 (1): 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie, and Rene Kemp. 1998. Technological Change. In Human Choices and Climate Change, ed. Steve Rayner and Elizabeth L. Malone, vol. II, 327–399. Columbus: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, Horst W.J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, Jan, Rene Kemp, and Marjolein Van Asselt. 2001. More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy. Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangawongse, Somporn, Frans Senger, and Rob Raven. 2012. The Multi-Level Perspective and the Scope for Sustainable Land Use Planning in Chiang Mai City. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 10 (2): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellberg, My M., Cathy Wilkinson, and Gary D. Peterson. 2015. Resilience Assessment: A Useful Approach to Navigate Urban Sustainability Challenges. Ecology and Society 20 (1): 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, Elizabeth, and Gordan Walker. 2007. CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management. Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian. 2007. Translating Sustainabilities Between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19 (4): 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian, and Andy Stirling. 2010. The Politics of Social-Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions. Ecology and Society 15 (1): 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Resilience Centre. 2014. What is Resilience? Accessed August 29, 2017. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.10119fc11455d3c557d6d21/1459560242299/SU_SRC_whatisresilience_sidaApril2014.pdf.

  • Truffer, Bernard, and Lars Coenen. 2012. Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies. Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, Paul, and Idil Gaziulusoy. 2014. Review of System Innovation and Transitions Theories. Accessed August 29, 2017. http://www.visionsandpathways.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Gaziulusoy_Twomey_NewBusinessModels.pdf.

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme [UN Habitat]. 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Brugge, Rutger, and Roel van Raak. 2007. Facing the Adaptive Management Challenge: Insights from Transition Management. Ecology and Society 12 (2): 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Stephen M. 2004. Planning for Sustainability, Creating Livable, Equitable, and Ecological Communities. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Cathy. 2011. Strategic Navigation: In Search of an Adaptable Mode of Strategic Spatial Planning Practice. Town Planning Review 82 (5): 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning. Planning Theory and Practice 13 (2): 319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, Marc, and Niki Frantzeskaki. 2016. Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda. Sustainability 8: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Tai-Chee, and Belinda Yuen. 2011. Eco-City Planning: Policies, Practice and Design. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Andréanne Doyon

Authors
  1. Andréanne Doyon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Thrive Research Hub, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Dominique Hes

  2. Thrive Research Hub, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Judy Bush

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doyon, A. (2018). Niches: Small-Scale Interventions or Radical Innovations to Build Up Internal Momentum. In: Hes, D., Bush, J. (eds) Enabling Eco-Cities. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7320-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7320-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7319-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7320-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation