Solar Photovoltaic Power Plants: Necessity and Techno-Economical Development

  • Pejush Chandra SarkerEmail author
  • Md. Rabiul Islam
  • Alok Kumar Paul
  • Subarto Kumar Ghosh
Part of the Renewable Energy Sources & Energy Storage book series (RESES)


Conventional power plants affect the environment by emitting greenhouse gases and other toxic pollutants. On the other hand, the reserve of fossil fuel is depleting day by day. It has been becoming obvious that renewable energy can overcome these challenges enormously. Solar photovoltaic (PV) has been gaining a significant popularity among renewable energy sources since last decade. Solar PV power plants are replacing the traditional power plants. The annual investment of solar PV system rises with a high growth rate in recent years. In 2015, the investment in solar sector was USD 161 billion which was the highest among all renewable sources, e.g., wind, biomass, biofuel and geothermal. Now, the cost of electricity generation from solar PV system is comparable with the cost of electricity from traditional generation systems. By the end of 2016, the cumulative installed capacity reached at around 300 GW whereas it was only 17.06 GW in 2010. About 15,000 tons of carbon dioxide emission can be reduced every year by a 10 MW solar PV plants. However, this chapter presents a detail analysis of a large scale solar PV power plant. The comparative technical specifications of different components of large scale solar PV plant, e.g., solar module, inverter, tracker and transformer are presented in the chapter. In addition, necessary factors that influence the selection of a site for a solar PV plant are also discussed.


Renewable energy Solar photovoltaic power plant Environment Technological advancement and prospect 


  1. 1.
    Islam MR, Islam MR, Beg MRA (2008) Renewable energy resources and technologies practice in Bangladesh. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:299–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Islam MR, Rahman F, Xu W (2016) Introduction, advances in solar photovoltaic power plant. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Earth Policy Institute, “Climate, energy and transportation,” Available online: Accessed 13 Oct 2016
  4. 4.
    Islam MR, Guo YG, Zhu JG (2014) A review of offshore wind turbine nacelle: technical challenges, and research and development trends. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Islam MR, Guo YG, Zhu JG (2014) Power converters for medium voltage networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable energy target setting. Available at: Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  7. 7.
    Gujrat Power Corporation LTD, Gujrat Solar Park. Available at: Accessed: 05 Aug 2017
  8. 8.
    Physicians for social responsibility, Coal-fired power plants: understanding the health cost of a dirty energy sources. Available at: Accessed 13 Mar 2017
  9. 9.
    International energy agency, coal. Available at: Accessed 14 July 2017
  10. 10.
    World coal association, coal world, why is coal important? Available at: Accessed 14 July 2017
  11. 11.
    Independent statistic and analysis, International Energy Outlook 2016, US energy information administration. Available at: Accessed 04 July 2017
  12. 12.
    British Petroleum, BP statistical review of world energy June 2016. Available at: Accesed 03 July 2017
  13. 13.
    Nuclear Energy Institute, world statistics, nuclear energy around the world. Available at: Accessed 02 July 2017
  14. 14.
    Xu Y, Hu J, Hao H, Wang D, Zhang H (2017) Current and future emissions of primary pollutants from coal fired power plants in Shaanxi China. Sci Total Environ 595:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arora JV, Cai Y, Jones A (2016) The national and international impacts of coal-to-gas switching in China power sector. Energy Econ 60:416–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rachel’s Democracy and Health News (2008) Green coal. Available at: Accessed 04 May 2017
  17. 17.
    Cohen BL (1990) T nuclear energy option, environmental problems with coal, oil, and gas: Penum press, Available at: Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  18. 18.
    Xu X, Meng B, Zhang C, Feng X, Gu C, Guo J, Bishop K, Xu Z, Zhang S, Qiu G (2016) The impact of coal fired power plants on inorganic mercury and methyl-mercury distribution in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Pollut 223:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Environmental impacts of power plants. Available online: Accessed 02 June 2017 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paschoa AS (2004) Interactions energy/environment-Environmental effects of nuclear power generation: Encyclopedia of life support systems Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    El-Hinnawi HE Review of the environmental impact of nuclear energy. IAEA BULLETIN 20(2):32–42. Available at: Accessed 15 May 2017
  22. 22.
    Kivi R (2017) How does nuclear energy affect the environment? Sciencing. Available at: Accessed 20 May 2017
  23. 23.
    Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. The first decade: 2004–2014. Available at: Accessed 15 Oct 2016
  24. 24.
    FS-UNEP collaborating centre for climate and sustainable energy finance, Frankfurt School. Global trends in renewable energy investment 2016. Available at: Accessed 21 Sept 2016
  25. 25.
    International Finance Corporation (IFC), World Bank Group. Utility- scale solar photovoltaic power plants. A project developer’s guide. Available at: Accessed 15 Sept 2016
  26. 26.
    International Energy Agency (IEA). Technological roadmap: solar photovoltaic energy. Available at: Accessed 16 Sept 2016
  27. 27.
    ASEA Brown Boveri. State of the art and experiences on efficient technologies for solar applications. Available at: Accessed 11 Oct 2016
  28. 28.
    Energy technology systems analysis programme (2013) Solar photovoltaics: technology brief. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li CT, Hsieh F, Yan S et al (2014) Crystalline silicon solar cells with thin silicon passivation film deposited prior to phosphorous diffusion. Int J Photoenergy 2014(491475): 1–8Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Opwis K, Gutmann JS, Alonso ARL (2016) Preparation of a textile-based dye-sensitized solar cell. Int J Photoenergy 3796074:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series. International Renewable Energy Agency (2012):1(4/5). Available online: Accessed 02 June 2017Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lyden S, Haque ME (2015) Maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic systems: a comprehensive review and comparative analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1504–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu L, Meng X, Liu C (2016) A review of maximum power point tracking methods of PV power system at uniform and partial shading. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:1500–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rizzo SA, Scelba G (2015) ANN based MPPT method for rapidly variable shading conditions. Appl Energy 145:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Verma D, Nema S, Shandilya AM, Dash SK (2014) Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques: recapitulation in solar photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1018–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hlaili M, Mechergui H (2016) Comparison of different MPPT algorithms with a proposed one using a power estimator for grid connected PV systems. Int J Photoenergy 1728398:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carrasco JM, Franquelo LG, Bialasiewicz JT et al (2006) Power electronic systems for the grid integration of renewable energy sources: a survey. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 53(4):1002–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Casaro MM, Martins DC (2010) Electronic processing of the photovoltaic solar energy in grid connected systems. Controley Automacao 21(2):159–172Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Martins DC (2013) Analysis of a three-phase grid-connected PV power system using a modified dual-stage inverter. ISRN Renew Energy 2013(406312):1–18Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ASEA Brown Boveri. ABB solar inverters for photovoltaic systems helping you get more energy out of every day. Available at: Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  41. 41.
    Siemens. SINVERT PVS 600 series central inverters and components for photovoltaic power plants. Available at: Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  42. 42.
    Fuji Electric. Large-scale photovoltaic power generation systems. Available at: Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  43. 43.
    Garcia IMM, Garcia EJP, Lopez VP et al (2016) Real-time monitoring system for a utility-scale photovoltaic power plant. Sensors 16(770):01–25Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eke R, Senturk A (2012) Performance comparison of a double-axis sun tracking versus fixed PV system. Sol Energy 86:2665–2672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yao Y, Hu Y, Gao S et al (2014) A multipurpose dual axis solar tracker with two tracking strategies. Renew Energy 72:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rahimi M, Banybayat M, Tagheie Y et al (2015) An insight on advantage of hybrid sun-wind-tracking over sun-tracking PV system. Energy Convers Manag 105:294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Khader MMA, Badran OO, Abdallah S (2008) Evaluating multi-axes sun-tracking system at different modes of operation in Jordan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:864–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    KIPP & ZONEN. Sun trackers for solar-tracking and PC-based positioning operations. Available at: Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  49. 49.
    Khan G, Rathi S (2014) Optimal site selection for solar PV power plant in an Indian state using geographical information system (GIS). Int J Emerg Eng Res Technol 2(7):260–266Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mondino EB, Fabrizio E, Chiabrando R (2015) Site selection of large ground-mounted photovoltaic plants: a GIS decision support system and an application to Italy. Int J Green Energy 12:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Krpan L, Šteko V, Koren Z (2012) Model for selecting locations for construction of solar power plants. Gradevinar 64(9):741–748Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aguilar LA (2015) Feasibility study of developing large scale solar PV project in Ghana: an economical analysis. Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sarkodie SA, Owusu PA (2016) The potential and economic viability of solar photovoltaic power in Ghana. Energy Sour Part A Recovery, Utilizat Environ Eff 38(5):709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pejush Chandra Sarker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Md. Rabiul Islam
    • 1
  • Alok Kumar Paul
    • 1
  • Subarto Kumar Ghosh
    • 1
  1. 1.Rajshahi University of Engineering and TechnologyRajshahiBangladesh

Personalised recommendations