Abstract
One of the most dangerous consequences of an equipment failure in process industries resulting in a fire and/or explosion is the triggering off of the “domino effect” or “chain of accidents.” An accident in a unit may trigger an accident in another unit which, in turn, may lead to yet other accidents. To prevent such an occurance, it is imperative that hazardous units are kept safe distances away from each other. Of the types of accidents that can occur in chemical process industries, the boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) is perhaps the most destructive of the forms of accidental explosions that can occur during the manufacture, storage, or transportation of chemicals in a pressure-liquefied state. The resulting blast wave, missiles, and fire or toxic release can cause great damage to life and property. There are several standards and codes which prescribe minimum safe distances to be maintained between equipment to prevent the domino effect from occurring. Of these the code prescribed by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA), USA, is among the ones most widely adopted for locating hazardous units. This paper evaluates the effectives of the safe distances prescribed by the NFPA 58 code in preventing a BLEVE in one vessel from causing other vessels and nearby structures to fail. The study reveals that the distances presented by NFPA are not sufficient to prevent the domino effect when the primary accident is a BLEVE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Khan F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1998. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. Discovery Publishing House New Delhi ix + 364 Pages.
Abbasi, T., E.V. Ramasamy, F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi. 2013. Regional EIA and risk assessment in a fast developing country. Nova Science, New York. x+433 pages. ISBN 978-1-61942-234-6.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1997. Accident hazard index: A multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 75 (4): 217–224.
Abbasi, T., and S.A. Abbasi. 2008. The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is fifty… and lives on! Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 21: 485–487.
Tauseef, S.M., and S.A. Abbasi. 2011. CFD-based simulation of dense gas dispersion in presence of obstacles. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 24: 371–376.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1998. Models for domino effect analysis in process industries. Process Safety Progress (AIChE) 17: 107–123.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1998. DOMIEFECT: (DoMIno eFFECT) a user-friendly software for domino effect-analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 13: 163–177.
Abdolhamidzadeh, B., T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S.A. Abbasi. 2010. A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 182: 416–426.
Abdolhamidzadeh, B., D. Rashtchian, T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi. 2011. Domino effect in process-industry accidents—an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries (Elsevier) 24 (5): 575–593.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1999. MAXCRED—a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environmental Modeling & Software 14 (1): 11–25.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 2002. A criteria for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15 (6): 467–475.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 2001. Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex. Journal of Cleaner Production 9 (6): 493–508.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 2001. An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect in a typical cluster of industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 14: 283–306.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1999. The worst chemical industry accident of 1990s: What happened and what might have been—a quantitative study. Process Safety Progress 18: 135–145.
Abbasi, T., and S.A. Abbasi. 2007. Accidental risk of superheated liquids and a framework for predicting the superheat limit. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 20: 165–181.
Abbasi, T., H. Pasman, and S.A. Abbasi. 2010. A scheme for the classification of explosions in the chemical process industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 174: 270–280.
Abdolhamidzadeh, B., T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S.A. Abbasi. 2010. Corrigendum to A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 184: 1–3.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1997. OptHAZOP—an effective and optimal methodology for conducting HAZOP, study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 10: 191–204.
Khan, F.I., and S.A. Abbasi. 1997. TOPHAZOP: A knowledge-based software. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 10: 333–343.
Vasanth S., S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi. 2013. Assessment of four turbulence models in simulation of large-scale pool fires in the presence of wind using computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Less Prevention in the Process Industries 26: 1071–1084.
NFPA-58. 2001. Standard for the storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gases. 49 CFR 173.315. Date of action: 76 FR 3345, Jan. 19, 2011. An international codes and standards organization.
Mukhim, E.D., T. Abbasi, S.M. Tauseef, and S.A. Abbasi. 2017a. Estimation of overpressure from boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE). Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, communication.
Mukhim, E.D., T. Abbasi, S.M. Tauseef and S.A. Abbasi. 2015. An assessment of the effectiveness of the NFPA 58 code in prescribing safe distances between LPG storage vessels and adjacent building/structures. International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering Research 6 (2): 5–14.
Mukhim, E.D., T. Abbasi, S.M. Tauseef, and S.A. Abbasi. 2017b. Domino effect in chemical process industries triggered by overpressure-formulation of equipment-specific probits. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 106: 263–273.
Birk, A.M., 1997. Fire tests of propane tanks to study BLEVEs and other thermal ruptures: detailed analysis of medium scale test results (No. TP 12498E).
Birk, A.M., J.D.J. VanderSteen and C.R. Davison. 2003. PRV field trials-the effects of fire conditions and PRV blowdown on propane tank survivability in a fire (No. TP 14045E).
Balke, C., W. Heller, R. Konersmann, and J. Ludwig. 1999. Study of the failure limits of a railway tank car filled with liquefied petroleum gas subjected to an open pool fire test, BAM project 3215. Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM).
Johnson, D.M., M.J. Pritchard, and M.J. Wickens. 1991. Large scale experimental study of BLEVE: Contract report on CEC co-funded research project, Contract report 15367, Project M8411. British Gas: Research & Technology division.
Giesbrecht, H., K. Hess, W. Leuckel, and B. Maurer. 1981. Analysis of explosion hazards on spontaneous release of inflammable gases into the atmosphere. Germ Chem Eng 4: 305–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mukhim, E.D., Abbasi, T., Tauseef, S.M., Abbasi, S.A. (2018). An Assessment of the Appropriateness of the Prescribed “Safe Distances” for Siting Hazardous Process Units to Prevent Domino Effect. In: Siddiqui, N., Tauseef, S., Abbasi, S., Rangwala, A. (eds) Advances in Fire and Process Safety. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7280-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7281-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)