Skip to main content

Recent Development in Machine Safeguarding for Protecting Humans from Complicated Machines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fire and Process Safety

Abstract

As we are in twenty-first century, industries are growing at rapid rate and thus evolution of advanced and more complicated machinery takes place. Basically humans are the ones who need to operate such machinery although some of them are operated remotely, but many demand direct human interaction. Every machine has its own unique hazard such as crushing, shearing, entanglement, cutting and drawing-in which may result in mechanical injuries such as abrasion, laceration, avulsion, and others. In order to prevent such injuries and protect human from such complicated machinery, we need to discover new and advanced protective equipment’s in order to safeguard human life. This paper discusses about such recent trends in protecting humans and advance technique to provide automatic cutoff if anything goes wrong from the design intent. There are various types of guards available such as interlock guard, fixed guard, adjustable guard and use according to the type of machinery. Apart from the guards, there are different types of protective appliances we are having such as presence sensing, pullback, restraint, tripwire cable, two-hand controls and gates. All such protective devices are designed for safeguarding specific types of hazard and can be installed only on particular types of machines. Each type of guards is having its own advantages and limitations, but it shall fulfill the basic requirement of a guard-such as preventing contact between human and hazardous rotating part of machine, firmly secure machine and is difficult to tamper with, it should not create any new hazard, and must not interfere with the operation. The recent sensitive protective equipment such as trip bars, pressure mats and photoelectric devices help improve safety. In hierarchy of control, safeguarding and protective devices come under engineering control. Once the possibility to eliminate or substitution is exhausted, these protective devices are placed to protect human. Machine guarding and other protective equipment’s are placed to remove or eliminate only mechanical hazards associated with the machinery, and they can not eliminate nonmechanical hazard associated with the machine such as electricity, noise, vibration. Accidents/incidents can be prevented once workers have proper knowledge about the machine and the safeguard that is placed to protect them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Courtney, A., and M. Ng. 1984. Hong Kong female hand dimensions and machine guarding. Ergonomics 27 (2): 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaillancourt, D.R., and S.H. Snook. 1995. A review of machine-guarding recommendations. Applied Ergonomics 26 (2): 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies, B., A. Abada, et al. 1980. A comparison of hand anthropometry of females in three ethnic groups. Ergonomics 23 (2): 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies, B., A. Abada, et al. 1980. Female hand dimensions and guarding of machines. Ergonomics 23 (1): 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker, D.L., L.M. Brosseau, et al. 2009. A randomized, controlled intervention of machine guarding and related safety programs in small metal-fabrication businesses. Public Health Reports 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grzan, J., and R. Keats. 2006. Machine guarding system having a sensing mat with status indicator lights. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roozbazar, A. 1977. Ergonomics of machine guarding. National Safety News 116 (1): 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chew, D.C. 1988. Effective occupational safety activities: Findings in three Asian developing countries. International Labour Review 127: 111.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich, H.W., D.C. Petersen, et al. 1980. Industrial accident prevention: A safety management approach. McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Munshi, K., D. Parker, et al. 2005. Machine safety evaluation in small metal working facilities: An evaluation of inter-rater reliability in the quantification of machine-related hazards. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 48 (5): 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brubaker, S.A. 1997. Optimum machine guarding. Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.) 66 (12): 37.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mendeloff, J., and W.B. Gray. 2005. Inside the black box: How do OSHA inspections lead to reductions in workplace injuries? Law & Policy 27 (2): 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yablonsky, J.E. 1993. Machine guard safety gauge/Guardchek™. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard III, T.W., and A.J. Keown. 1978. A goal programming application of capital project selection in the production area. AIIE Transactions 10 (1): 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Etherton, J.R. 2007. Industrial machine systems risk assessment: A critical review of concepts and methods. Risk Analysis 27 (1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Richards, E.G. 1981. Machine guarding apparatus. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoln, J.M., D.L. Lucas, et al. 2008. Reducing commercial fishing deck hazards with engineering solutions for winch design. Journal of Safety Research 39 (2): 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang, B.C., A.Y. Lio, et al. 1991. An evaluation of machine guarding techniques for robot guarding. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 7 (4): 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker, D., L. Brosseau, et al. 2007. A comparison of the perceptions and beliefs of workers and owners with regard to workplace safety in small metal fabrication businesses. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 50 (12): 999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haviland, A., R. Burns, et al. 2010. What kinds of injuries do OSHA inspections prevent? Journal of Safety Research 41 (4): 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bello Jr, R. (2002). Lighted automotive floor mats, Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davies, B.B., and B. Mebarki. 1981. Hand movement times and machine guarding. Ergonomics 24 (5): 387–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnett, R.L., and D.B. Brickman. 1986. Safety hierarchy. Journal of Safety Research 17 (2): 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamin, S., D. Parker, et al. 2014. National machine guarding program: Design of a machine safety intervention. Safety Science Monitor (Sweden) 18 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parker, D.L., S.C. Yamin, et al. 2015. National machine guarding program: Part 1. Machine safeguarding practices in small metal fabrication businesses. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 58 (11): 1174–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parker, D.L., S.C. Yamin, et al. 2015. National machine guarding program: Part 2. Safety management in small metal fabrication enterprises. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 58 (11): 1184–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gray, G.C. 2009. The responsibilization strategy of health and safety neo-liberalism and the reconfiguration of individual responsibility for risk. British Journal of Criminology 49 (3): 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Rourke, D. 2000. Monitoring the monitors: A critique of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) labor monitoring. Department of Urban Studies and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rasmussen, A. 1929. Barbecue-machine guarding device. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Becker, J.E. 2001. Implementing 5S: To promote safety & housekeeping. Professional Safety 46 (8): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Okunribido, O.O. 2000. A survey of hand anthropometry of female rural farm workers in Ibadan, Western Nigeria. Ergonomics 43 (2): 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rautiainen, R.H., J.L. Lange, et al. 2004. Injuries in the Iowa certified safe farm study. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 10 (1): 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blundell, J. 1987. Safety engineering—Machine guarding accidents. Del Mar, CA: Hanrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Montgomery, W. 1956. Machine guarding. The Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roberts, V.L. 1980. Machine guarding: A historical perspective. Institute for Product Safety.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Switches, S.S.I. 1998. Machine guarding safety products catalog & handbook. NY: Hawthorne.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marshall, R., and E. Bingham. 1977. Essentials of machine guarding. USA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Safety, M.L.W. 1989. Guidelines for machine guarding. Canada: Health and Support Services Division.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Imrhan, S.N., M.-T. Nguyen, et al. 1993. Hand anthropometry of Americans of Vietnamese origin. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 12 (4): 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Courtney, A. 1984. Hand anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese females compared to other ethnic groups. Ergonomics 27 (11): 1169–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brown, G.D., and D. O’rourke. 2007. Lean manufacturing comes to China: A case study of its impact on workplace health and safety. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 13 (3): 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sorock, G.S., E. Smith, et al. 1993. Hospitalized occupational finger amputations, New Jersey, 1985 and 1986. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 23 (3): 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ezenwa, A.O. 2001. A study of fatal injuries in Nigerian factories. Occupational Medicine 51 (8): 485–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Camper, W.J. 1976. Sharpener for commodity slicing machine. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shie III, H.J. 1976. Sharpener for commodity slicing machine. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mendeloff, J. 1984. The role of OSHA violations in serious workplace accidents. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 26 (5): 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Samuel, R.J. 1975. Apparatus for selectively guarding a rotary blade. Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Dharani Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ora, A., Dharani Kumar, K., Dewan, R. (2018). Recent Development in Machine Safeguarding for Protecting Humans from Complicated Machines. In: Siddiqui, N., Tauseef, S., Abbasi, S., Rangwala, A. (eds) Advances in Fire and Process Safety. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7280-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7281-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics