Skip to main content

Research Photography in the Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Photography as a Social Research Method
  • 2038 Accesses

Abstract

Good fieldwork with visual methods requires good photographic work. The aim of this chapter is to explain the technical aspect of image-making by presenting the ‘exposure triangle’ that describes the interrelationship between shutter speed, aperture and ISO. The relationships of camera settings in the exposure triangle are important to understand for social researchers, as optimal exposed image hold the most detail and subsequent data is not lost due to over- or underexposure of images. Furthermore, this chapter includes a discussion of photography as a research method in its field application. It can be a powerful social and research enabler, which directly affects the quality of data collected. However, photography in the field can also consciously or subconsciously become a tool for perpetuating stereotypes or reinforcing stigma. With this underlying foundation, the concept of Verständnis is introduced as an important field element of the data collection process. Applying this concept might help researchers better navigate the challenges and encounters when collecting photographs in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: Ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, M. B. (1958). On the subject-object relationship. The Journal of Philosophy, 55(3), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W. (2000). Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(1), 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist, 54(9), 765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachler, H. P., & Hosking, D. M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in research: Issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(3), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 3–13). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L., & Quek, F. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems: time to be subjective? In Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 444–465). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on a spoiled identity. JH & Carpenter: Jenkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, E. (2014). Photo-based research practice: A discussion of socially endangered, transdisciplinary, and expanded practices in contemporary photography. Photography as Social Practice, 1(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. L., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 237–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. (2001). Exploring the relationship between photographer and subject. Nieman Reports, 55(3), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelle, D. (2010). The ground they walk on: Photography and narrative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, J. (1996). Probabilistic national stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(6), 961–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. E., & Corrigan, P. W. (2010). Psychotherapy for self-stigma among rural clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 524–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., Yang, L. H., Phelan, J. C., & Collins, P. Y. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57(2), 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. (2010). Digital photography: The AACD series—Part 1. http://www.saudident.com/doc/share/digital_photography_the_aacd_series_part_one.pdf.

  • Marsh, N. (2014). Forensic photography: A practitioner’s guide. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, A., Walter, G., Casey, D., & Hocking, B. (2000). Combating psychiatric stigma: An overview of contemporary initiatives. Australasian Psychiatry, 8(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotyping process. Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121–157). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saukko, P. (2002). Studying the self: From the subjective and the social to personal and political dialogues. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scambler, G. (1984). Perceiving and coping with stigmatizing illness. In J. H. R. Fitzpatrick, S. Newman, G. Scambler, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The experience of illness (pp. 203–226). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon-Godeau, A. (1994). Inside/out: Basic critical theory for photographers. Burlington, VT: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, J. (1988). The burden of representation: Essays on photographies and histories (Vol. 80). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. T. (1965). Max Weber’s Verstehen. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Haake, S. (2006). Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Hackler, A. H. (2007). Perceived public stigma and the willingness to seek counseling: The mediating roles of self-stigma and attitudes toward counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In G. Mills (Ed.), Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (p. 132) (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, collaborative research tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. H., Kleinman, A., Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007). Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Social Science and Medicine, 64(7), 1524–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sten Langmann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Langmann, S., Pick, D. (2018). Research Photography in the Field. In: Photography as a Social Research Method. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7277-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7279-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics