Abstract
Good fieldwork with visual methods requires good photographic work. The aim of this chapter is to explain the technical aspect of image-making by presenting the ‘exposure triangle’ that describes the interrelationship between shutter speed, aperture and ISO. The relationships of camera settings in the exposure triangle are important to understand for social researchers, as optimal exposed image hold the most detail and subsequent data is not lost due to over- or underexposure of images. Furthermore, this chapter includes a discussion of photography as a research method in its field application. It can be a powerful social and research enabler, which directly affects the quality of data collected. However, photography in the field can also consciously or subconsciously become a tool for perpetuating stereotypes or reinforcing stigma. With this underlying foundation, the concept of Verständnis is introduced as an important field element of the data collection process. Applying this concept might help researchers better navigate the challenges and encounters when collecting photographs in the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: Ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 443–458.
Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. New York: Basic Books.
Bakan, M. B. (1958). On the subject-object relationship. The Journal of Philosophy, 55(3), 89–101.
Corrigan, P. W. (2000). Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(1), 48–67.
Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist, 54(9), 765.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Dachler, H. P., & Hosking, D. M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities.
Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in research: Issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(3), 379–393.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: College Publishers.
Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 3–13). London: Sage Publications.
Garcia, L., & Quek, F. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems: time to be subjective? In Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 444–465). Berlin: Springer.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on a spoiled identity. JH & Carpenter: Jenkins.
Gregory, E. (2014). Photo-based research practice: A discussion of socially endangered, transdisciplinary, and expanded practices in contemporary photography. Photography as Social Practice, 1(1), 1–4.
Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336.
Hilton, J. L., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 237–271.
Keim, D. (2001). Exploring the relationship between photographer and subject. Nieman Reports, 55(3), 22.
Ketelle, D. (2010). The ground they walk on: Photography and narrative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 547.
Krueger, J. (1996). Probabilistic national stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(6), 961–980.
Larson, J. E., & Corrigan, P. W. (2010). Psychotherapy for self-stigma among rural clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 524–536.
Link, B. G., Yang, L. H., Phelan, J. C., & Collins, P. Y. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.
Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57(2), 100.
Lowe, E. (2010). Digital photography: The AACD series—Part 1. http://www.saudident.com/doc/share/digital_photography_the_aacd_series_part_one.pdf.
Marsh, N. (2014). Forensic photography: A practitioner’s guide. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192.
Rosen, A., Walter, G., Casey, D., & Hocking, B. (2000). Combating psychiatric stigma: An overview of contemporary initiatives. Australasian Psychiatry, 8(1), 19–26.
Ryan, C. S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotyping process. Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121–157). New York: Guilford Press.
Saukko, P. (2002). Studying the self: From the subjective and the social to personal and political dialogues. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 244–263.
Scambler, G. (1984). Perceiving and coping with stigmatizing illness. In J. H. R. Fitzpatrick, S. Newman, G. Scambler, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The experience of illness (pp. 203–226). London: Tavistock.
Solomon-Godeau, A. (1994). Inside/out: Basic critical theory for photographers. Burlington, VT: Focal Press.
Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. London: Macmillan.
Tagg, J. (1988). The burden of representation: Essays on photographies and histories (Vol. 80). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tucker, W. T. (1965). Max Weber’s Verstehen. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 157–164.
Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Haake, S. (2006). Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 325–337.
Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Hackler, A. H. (2007). Perceived public stigma and the willingness to seek counseling: The mediating roles of self-stigma and attitudes toward counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 40.
Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In G. Mills (Ed.), Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (p. 132) (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, collaborative research tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428.
Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.
Yang, L. H., Kleinman, A., Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007). Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Social Science and Medicine, 64(7), 1524–1535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langmann, S., Pick, D. (2018). Research Photography in the Field. In: Photography as a Social Research Method. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7277-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7279-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)