Research Photography in the Field

Chapter

Abstract

Good fieldwork with visual methods requires good photographic work. The aim of this chapter is to explain the technical aspect of image-making by presenting the ‘exposure triangle’ that describes the interrelationship between shutter speed, aperture and ISO. The relationships of camera settings in the exposure triangle are important to understand for social researchers, as optimal exposed image hold the most detail and subsequent data is not lost due to over- or underexposure of images. Furthermore, this chapter includes a discussion of photography as a research method in its field application. It can be a powerful social and research enabler, which directly affects the quality of data collected. However, photography in the field can also consciously or subconsciously become a tool for perpetuating stereotypes or reinforcing stigma. With this underlying foundation, the concept of Verständnis is introduced as an important field element of the data collection process. Applying this concept might help researchers better navigate the challenges and encounters when collecting photographs in the field.

Keywords

Fieldwork Exposure triangle Stigma Perceived realities Verstaendnis 

References

  1. Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: Ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, M. B. (1958). On the subject-object relationship. The Journal of Philosophy, 55(3), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corrigan, P. W. (2000). Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(1), 48–67.Google Scholar
  5. Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. American Psychologist, 54(9), 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Dachler, H. P., & Hosking, D. M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructing organizational realities.Google Scholar
  8. Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in research: Issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: College Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 3–13). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia, L., & Quek, F. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems: time to be subjective? In Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 444–465). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on a spoiled identity. JH & Carpenter: Jenkins.Google Scholar
  14. Gregory, E. (2014). Photo-based research practice: A discussion of socially endangered, transdisciplinary, and expanded practices in contemporary photography. Photography as Social Practice, 1(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hilton, J. L., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 237–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keim, D. (2001). Exploring the relationship between photographer and subject. Nieman Reports, 55(3), 22.Google Scholar
  18. Ketelle, D. (2010). The ground they walk on: Photography and narrative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 547.Google Scholar
  19. Krueger, J. (1996). Probabilistic national stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(6), 961–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larson, J. E., & Corrigan, P. W. (2010). Psychotherapy for self-stigma among rural clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 524–536.Google Scholar
  21. Link, B. G., Yang, L. H., Phelan, J. C., & Collins, P. Y. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57(2), 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lowe, E. (2010). Digital photography: The AACD series—Part 1. http://www.saudident.com/doc/share/digital_photography_the_aacd_series_part_one.pdf.
  24. Marsh, N. (2014). Forensic photography: A practitioner’s guide. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosen, A., Walter, G., Casey, D., & Hocking, B. (2000). Combating psychiatric stigma: An overview of contemporary initiatives. Australasian Psychiatry, 8(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan, C. S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotyping process. Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121–157). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Saukko, P. (2002). Studying the self: From the subjective and the social to personal and political dialogues. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scambler, G. (1984). Perceiving and coping with stigmatizing illness. In J. H. R. Fitzpatrick, S. Newman, G. Scambler, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The experience of illness (pp. 203–226). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  30. Solomon-Godeau, A. (1994). Inside/out: Basic critical theory for photographers. Burlington, VT: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Tagg, J. (1988). The burden of representation: Essays on photographies and histories (Vol. 80). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tucker, W. T. (1965). Max Weber’s Verstehen. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Haake, S. (2006). Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., & Hackler, A. H. (2007). Perceived public stigma and the willingness to seek counseling: The mediating roles of self-stigma and attitudes toward counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In G. Mills (Ed.), Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (p. 132) (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, collaborative research tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428.Google Scholar
  39. Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, L. H., Kleinman, A., Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Lee, S., & Good, B. (2007). Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Social Science and Medicine, 64(7), 1524–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin Business SchoolPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations