Advertisement

Deep Drawing

  • Amit BhaduriEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Materials Science book series (SSMATERIALS, volume 264)

Abstract

Deep drawing: definition and fundamentals. Stresses and deformation in a deep-drawn cup. Deep drawing load and its components and their variations with punch movement. Derivation of mathematical expression for load and its comparison with Sachs relation. Formability: properties of work metal for optimal formability. Strain distribution in a forming operation determined by strain-hardening exponent, strain rate sensitivity and plastic strain ratio. Allowable maximum deformation level represented graphically as forming limit diagram. Deep drawability and its relation with plastic strain ratio. Conditions for optimal drawability. Measurement of drawability by drawing ratio using Swift cup test. Limiting draw ratio to express deformation limit in deep drawing. Effects of process variables that include drawing ratio and redrawing operations, profile radii of die and punch, punch-to-die clearance, drawing speed, friction and lubrication, restraint of metal flow, such as use of a blank holder. Effects of material parameters that include sheet thickness and anisotropy. Evaluation of formability of sheet metal using different type tests, such as Marciniak biaxial stretching test, Swift cup test, Ericksen and Olsen cup tests, Fukui conical cup test, hole expansion test and forming limit diagram using hemispherical punch method. Defects in deep-drawn components. Problems and solutions.

References

  1. Alexander, J.M.: Metall. Rev. 5, 349–411 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM E643: Standard Test Method for Ball Punch Deformation of Metallic Sheet Material. Designation: E643—15. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa. https://doi.org/10.1520/e0643-15 (2015)
  3. Brammar, I.S., Harris, D.A.: Production and properties of sheet steel and aluminum alloys for forming applications. J. Aust. Inst. Met. 20(2), 85–100 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Chung, S.Y., Swift, H.W.: Cup-drawing from a flat blank. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (London) 165, 199–228 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dieter, G.E.: Sheet-metal forming. In: Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company (UK) Ltd., London, p. 669 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. Dinda, S., James, K.F., Keeler, S.P., Stine, P.A.: How to Use Circle Grid Analysis for Die Tryout. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1981)Google Scholar
  7. Eary, D.F., Reed, E.A.: Techniques of Press working Sheet Metal, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, pp. 136–172 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Frommann, K.M.: Proceedings of American Metal Stampling Association Conference, Detroit, MI, pp. 1–55, Apr 1968Google Scholar
  9. Ghosh, A.K.: The influence of strain hardening and strain-rate sensitivity on sheet metal forming. Trans. ASME 99, 264–274 (1977)Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin, G.M.: Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. Society of Automotive Engineers, Congress, Detroit, paper 680093 (1968)Google Scholar
  11. Hosford, W.F., Caddell, R.M.: Metal Forming, Mechanics and Metallurgy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 273, 309 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. Keeler, S.P.: Determination of forming limits in automotive stampings. Sheet Met. Ind. 42, 683–691 (1965)Google Scholar
  13. Keeler, S.P.: Sheet Metal Ind. 7, 511 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. Keeler, S.P., Backofen, W.A.: Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. Trans. ASM 56(1), 25–48 (1963)Google Scholar
  15. Keeler, S.P., Brazier, W.G.: Relationship between laboratory material characterization and press-shop formability. In: Micro Alloying 75 Proceedings, Union Carbide Corporation, pp. 517–530 (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Kemmis, O.H.: Sheet Met. Ind. 34(203), 251 (1957)Google Scholar
  17. Langford, E.: Trans. ADM 42, 1197 (1950)Google Scholar
  18. Marciniak, Z., Kuczynski, K.: Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 9, 609–620 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michaealis, E.E.: Sheet Metal Ind. 936 (1979)Google Scholar
  20. Naziri, H., Pearce, R.: The effect of plastic anisotropy on flange—wrinkling behavior during sheet metal forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 10, 681–694 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sachs, G.: Spanlose Formung, pp. 11–38. Springer-Verlag OHG, Berlin (1930)Google Scholar
  22. Sachs, G., Van Horn, K.R.: Practical metallurgy, pp. 430–431. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1940)Google Scholar
  23. Semiatin, S.L. (ed.): Metalworking: Sheet Forming. ASM Handbook, vol. 14B, pp. 325, 327. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (2006)Google Scholar
  24. Shey, J.A.: J. Mater. Shaping Technol. 6(2), 103 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swift, H.W.: J. Inst. Met. 82, 119 (1952)Google Scholar
  26. Whiteley, R.L.: Trans. ASM 53, 159 (1960)Google Scholar
  27. Willis, J., Blade, J.C.: Sheet Metal Ind. 4, 316 (1966)Google Scholar
  28. Yoshida, K., Miyauchi, K.: Experimental studies of material behavior as related to sheet metal forming. In: Koistinen, D.P., Wang, N.M. (eds.) Mechanics of sheet metal forming—material behavior and deformation analysis, pp. 19–52. Plenum Press, New York (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations