Advertisement

Structural Integrity Assessment of a Reactor Pressure Vessel Using State-of-the-Art Methodologies—A Case Study

  • V. ChaudhryEmail author
  • S. M. Ingole
  • A. K. Balasubrahmanian
  • U. C. Muktibodh
Conference paper
  • 755 Downloads

Abstract

Structural integrity assessment of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) has been carried out for design life of the reactor using state-of-the-art methodologies. Irradiation damage is the governing material degradation for core belt region of RPV, and it is quantified based on the surveillance program. Structural integrity assessment has been carried out for the postulated flaw at the core belt region to demonstrate the protection of the vessel against catastrophic failure, plastic collapse, and tearing instability. Protection against catastrophic failure has been demonstrated based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. Stable crack extension and flaw stability due to ductile tearing have been demonstrated based on J-integral and failure assessment diagram (FAD). Limiting values of flaw depth and flaw length have been evaluated to demonstrate the protection against all failure modes. Further, leak-before-break (LBB) criterion has been adopted to demonstrate the defense in depth philosophy. Limiting flaw length to depth ratio has been quantified in order to demonstrate leak-before-break criterion. The assessment has demonstrated the healthiness of the vessel for safe operation.

Keywords

Irradiation damage Catastrophic failure Plastic collapse Tearing instability Leak-before-break 

References

  1. 1.
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, No NT-T-3.11 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.99 Rev 2 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM E 900-02, Standard guide for predicting radiation-induced transition temperature shift in reactor pressure materials, E706, Reapproved-2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASME Section XI, 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.C. Katiyar, S.S. Bajaj, Tarapur atomic power station units-1 and 2: design features, operating experience, and license renewal. Nucl Energy Des 236(7–8), 881–893 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    EPRI technical report, BWR Pressure Vessel Embrittlement correlation studies, 1019056 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Eason, G.R. Odette, R.K. Naustad, T. Yamamoto, A physically based correlation of irradiation-induced transition temperature shifts for RPV steels, ORNL report, ORNL/TM-2006/530 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    WRC bulletin 413, Development of criteria for assessment of reactor vessels with low upper shelf fracture toughness (Welding Research Council, New York, 1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    EPRI report, Evaluation of the toughness properties and ASME service A/B upper shelf toughness criteria for A 302B vessel steel, report no. TR-103434 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.R. Irwin, Fracture of Pressure Vessels, McGraw-Hill (1963)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Broek, Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics (1978)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    USNRC RG 1.161, Evaluation of Reactor Pressure vessel with Charpy upper–shelf energy less than 50ft-lb (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Chaudhry
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. M. Ingole
    • 1
  • A. K. Balasubrahmanian
    • 1
  • U. C. Muktibodh
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear Power Corporation of India LimitedMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations