Energy Absorption Characteristics of AA7075-T6 Tube Filled with Aluminum Foam

  • S. Vignesh
  • C. Lakshmana Rao
  • Simhachalam Bade
Conference paper


In this article, energy absorption and dynamic compressive stress–strain behavior of aluminum foam-filled and empty tube of aluminum alloy AA7075-T6 were investigated using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique. Both quasi-static and dynamic compression tests were conducted on closed-cell aluminum foam specimens having a relative density of 0.16. The experimental results showed that the plateau stress and energy absorption of foam-filled aluminum alloy AA7075-T6 tube specimen increase with increase in strain rate. The load-deformation characteristics, failure modes, and energy absorption capacity of different structures under dynamic loading were investigated. At higher strain rates, the energy absorption capacity of foam-filled aluminum alloy tubes was found to be increased, which is useful for crashworthy applications.


SHPB Aluminum alloy Energy absorption Crashworthiness ALPORAS Crushable foam 



Density of closed-cell aluminum foam


Plateau stress


Densification strain


Energy absorption


Cross-sectional area of incident bar


Cross-sectional area of transmitted bar


Longitudinal wave speed



The authors acknowledge Professor P. Venkitanarayanan from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur for valuable discussions and collaboration.


  1. 1.
    M.F. Ashby, A.G. Evans, N.A. Fleck, L.J. Gibson, J.W. Hutchinson, H.N.G. Wadley, Making Metal Foams, Metal Foams (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Banhart, J. Baumeister, M. Weber, Damping properties of aluminium foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 205(1–2), 221–228 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aluminum Foam Technology Applied to Automotive Design, Cymat Corporation (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.E. Raj, V. Parameswaran, B.S.S. Daniel, Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 526, 11–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Mukai, H. Kanahashi, T. Miyoshi, M. Mabuchi, T.G. Nieh, K. Higashi, Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. ScriptaMaterialia 40(8), 921–927 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.G. Hanssen, O.S. Hopperstand, M. Langseth, Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 44(2), 359–406 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.W. Hall, M. Guden, C.J. Yu, Crushing of aluminum closed cell foams: density and strain rate effects. ScriptaMaterialia 43(6), 515–521 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Kolsky, An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B 62(11), 676–700 (1949)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Chen, B. Zhang, M.J. Forrestal, A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials. Experimental Mechanics 39(2), 81–85 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Vignesh
    • 1
  • C. Lakshmana Rao
    • 1
  • Simhachalam Bade
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Corporate Technology CentreTube Investment of India Ltd.Avadi, ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations