Skip to main content

Information Cascade and Phase Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 390 Accesses

Part of the book series: Agent-Based Social Systems ((ABSS,volume 14))

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss a voting model with two candidates. We set two types of voters – herders and independents. The voting of independent voters is based on their fundamental values; on the other hand, the voting of herders is based on the number of votes. Herders always select the majority of the previous r votes, which is visible to them. We call them digital herders. As the fraction of herders increases, the model features a phase transition beyond which a state where most voters make the correct choice coexists with one where most of them are wrong. Here we obtain the exact solutions of the model. The main contents of this chapter are based on Hisakado and Mori (J Phys A 22:275204, 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of Fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as information cascades. J Polit Econ 100:992–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W (2000) The correlated random walk with boundaries: a combinatorial solution. J Appl Prob 37:470–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curty P, Marsili M (2006) Phase coexistence in a forecasting game. JSTAT P03013

    Google Scholar 

  • Cont R, Bouchaud J (2000) Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets. Macroecon Dyn 4:170–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Francesco P, Golinelli O, Guitter E (1997) Meander, folding, and arch statistics. Math Comput Model 26(8):97–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eguíluz V, Zimmermann M (2000) Transmission of information and herd behavior: an application to financial markets. Phys Rev Lett 85:5659–5662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galam G (1990) Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group. Stat Phys 61:943–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Hino M (2016) Between ant colony optimization and generic algorithm. J IPS Jpn 9(3):8–14 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2010) Phase transition and information cascade in a voting model. J Phys A 43:315207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2011) Digital herders and phase transition in a voting model. J Phys A 22:275204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Kitsukawa K, Mori S (2006) Correlated binomial models and correlated structure. J. Phys. A. 39:15365–15378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) General theory of employment interest and money. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno N (2002) Limit theorems and absorption problems for quantum random walks in one dimension. Quantum Inf Comput 2:578–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang W (2000) On polynominals related to power of the generating function of Catalan’s numbers. Fib Quart 38:408

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S, Hisakado M (2010) Exact scale invariance in mixing of binary candidates in voting. J Phys Soc Jpn 79:034001–034008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D (2002) Sociophysics: the Sznajd model and its applications. Comput Phys Commun 146(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A Catalan Number and Extended

Here, we consider the number of monotonic paths along the edges of a grid with square cells, which do not pass lower the diagonal. Let m and n be the horizontal axis and the vertical axis, respectively. The coordinates of the lower left corner are (0, 0). A monotonic path is one which starts in the lower left corner; finishes in the upper triangle (m, n), where 0 ≤ m ≤ n; and consists entirely of edges pointing rightward or upward.

The number of paths from (0, 0) to (m, n) can be calculated as

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} C_{m,n}=\frac{(n-m+1)(n+m)!}{m!(n+1)!} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} n+m\\ n \end{array} \right) - \left( \begin{array}{cc} n+m\\ n+1 \end{array} \right) . {} \end{aligned} $$
(22)

These numbers are known as generalized Catalan number.

If the finish point is (m, m), the number of paths becomes the Catalan number.

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} C_{m,m}=c_m = \frac{2m!}{m!(m+1)!} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2m\\ m \end{array} \right) - \left( \begin{array}{cc} 2m\\ m+1 \end{array} \right) . \end{aligned} $$
(23)

Next, we compute the distribution of the number of the paths that starts in the lower left corner, finishes in the upper triangle (m, n), and touches the diagonal k times (Di Francesco et al. 1997; Lang 2000). Let A m,n,k denote the number of paths that touches the diagonal k times. We get a simple recursion relation about A m,n,k.

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} A_{m,n,k}=\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}c_{j}A_{m-j-1,n-j-1,k-1}, {} \end{aligned} $$
(24)

for k ≥ 0, n, m ≥ 0, and m ≥ k, with the initial condition A 0,0,0 = 1. This defines the numbers A m,n,k uniquely, and it is easy to prove that

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} A_{m,n,k}&=&\frac{(n-m+k)(n+m-k-1)!}{n!(m-k)!} \\ &=& \left( \begin{array}{cc} n+m-k-1\\ n-1 \end{array} \right) - \left( \begin{array}{cc} n+m-k-1\\ n \end{array} \right) . {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(25)

From (22) and (25), we can obtain the relation

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} A_{m,m,k}=C_{m-k,m-1}. {} \end{aligned} $$
(26)

The well-known generating function C 0(x) of Catalan numbers is given by

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} C_0(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{m,m}x^{n} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle 1+x+2x^2+5x^3+14x^4+42x^5+132x^6+\cdots, \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(27)

subject to the algebraic relation

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} xC_0(x)^2=C_0(x)-1, \end{aligned} $$
(28)

and we can obtain

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} C_0(x)=\frac{1-\sqrt{1-4x}}{2x}. {} \end{aligned} $$
(29)

Here, we obtain the generating function A m,k(x) of A m,m,k.

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} A_{m,k}(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{m-k=0}^{\infty}A_{m,m,k}x^{m-k} =\sum_{m-k=0}^{\infty}C_{m-k,m-1}x^{m-k} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{l=0}^{\infty}C_{l,l+k-1}x^{l} =C_{k-1}(x). {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(30)

We use (26) for the second equality. \(C_{j}(x)=\sum _{l=1}^{\infty }C_{l,l+j}x^{l}\) is the generating function of the generalized Catalan number (22). The generating function of the generalized Catalan number is given by

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} C_1(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{m,m+1}x^{n} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle 1+2x+5x^2+14x^3+42x^4+132x^5+429x^6+\cdots, \\ C_2(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{m,m+2}x^{n} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle 1+3x+9x^2+28x^3+90x^4+297x^5+1001x^6+\cdots, \\ C_3(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{m,m+3}x^{n} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle 1+4x+14x^2+48x^3+165x^4+572x^5\cdots. \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

From (24), we can obtain

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} C_{j}(x)=C_{j-1}(x)C_{0}(x). \end{aligned} $$
(31)

Thus, the simple relation between the generating functions is given by

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} C_{j}(x)=\{ C_{0}(x) \}^{j+1}. {} \end{aligned} $$
(32)

Appendix B Derivation of \(\tilde {R_1}\), R 1, and R 2

\(\tilde {R_1}\) is the probability that the path starts from (0, 0), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n) (Fig. 5).

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \tilde{R_1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (1-B) [1+y\gamma_1 C_0(y)+(y\gamma_1)^2C_1(y)+(y\gamma)^3 C_2(y)+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (1-B) [1+y\gamma_1 C_0(y)+(y\gamma_1)^2\{C_0(y)\}^2+(y\gamma_1)^3\{ C_0(y)\}^{3}+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (1-B)[\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \{\gamma_1 yC_{0} (y)\}^{k}] = \frac{1-B}{1-\gamma_1 AC_0(A)} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{2(1-B)}{2-\gamma_1(1-\sqrt{1-4A(1-A)})}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(33)

where A and B are given by (1), γ 1 = BA, and y = A(1 − A). C k(y) is the generation function of the generalized Catalan number (30). Here, we use the relations (32) and (29). When q = 1, (33) reduces to (8).

Fig. 5
figure 5

\(\tilde {R_1}\), R 1, and R 2. \(\tilde {R_1}\) is the probability that the path starts from (0, 0), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n). R 1 is the probability that the path starts from the wall n = m + 1 in I (m < n), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n). R 2 is the probability that the path starts from the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m + 1 in I (m < n)

R 1 is the probability that the path starts from the wall n = m + 1 in I (m < n), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n).

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} R_1&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{1-B}{B} [y\gamma_1 C_0(y)+(y\gamma_1)^2C_1(y)+(y\gamma_1)^3 C_2(y)+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{1-B}{B}[y\gamma_1 C_0(y)+(y\gamma_1)^2\{C_0(y)\}^2+(y\gamma_1)^3\{ C_0(y)\}^{3}+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{1-B}{B}[\frac{\tilde{R_1}}{1-B}-1] = \frac{(1-B)\gamma_1(1-\sqrt{1-4A(1-A)})}{B\{2-\gamma_1(1-\sqrt{1-4A(1-A)})\}}. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(34)

R 2 is the probability that the path starts from the wall n = m − 1 in II (m > n), goes across the diagonal only once, and reaches the wall n = m + 1 in I (m < n).

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} R_2&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{B}{1-B} [z\gamma_2 C_0(z)+(z\gamma_2)^2C_1(z)+(z\gamma_2)^3 C_2(z)+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{B}{1-B}[z\gamma_2 C_0(z)+(z\gamma_2)^2\{C_0(z)\}^2+(z\gamma_2)^3\{ C_0(z)\}^{3}+\cdots ] \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{B\gamma_2(1-\sqrt{1-4C(1-C)})}{(1-B)\{2-\gamma_2(1-\sqrt{1-4C(1-C)})\}}. {}, \end{array} \end{aligned} $$
(35)

where C is given by (1), γ 2 = (1 − B)∕(1 − C), and z = C(1 − C).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hisakado, M., Mori, S. (2019). Information Cascade and Phase Transition. In: Sato, AH. (eds) Applications of Data-Centric Science to Social Design. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 14. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7194-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics