Abstract
Sandwich structures have high energy absorption and blast mitigation capabilities due to their configuration. In the present chapter, a computational model using time domain spectral element method or spectral element method (SEM) developed by the authors for a sandwich beam with composite facesheets and a compliant core is explained. This computational model is developed based on extended high order sandwich panel theory (EHSAPT) in which higher order displacement functions are taken for the core in order to incorporate core compression. A brief explanation about the underwater explosion (UNDEX) phenomena and the loading is presented. The sandwich model and analytical model developed by Hayman (1995) are used to study the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) and response of sandwich structures to the UNDEX loading. Significant differences in the FSI responses of homogeneous and sandwich structures is shown. These studies will result in the design of an optimal configuration for blast resistant sandwich structures.
References
Zenkert, D. (1995). An introduction to sandwich construction. London: EMAS.
Taylor, G. I. (1963). The pressure and impulse of submarine explosion waves on plates. The scientific (Vol. 3, pp. 287–303).
Raja Sekhar, B., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Murthy, M. V. V. S. (2016). Wave transmission characteristics for higher-order sandwich panel with flexible core using time-domain spectral element method. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 1099636216664536 (2016).
Wanji, C., & Zhen, W. (2008). A selective review on recent development of displacement-based laminated plate theories. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, 1, 29–44.
Frostig, Y., Baruch, M., Vilnay, O., & Sheinman, I. (1992). High order theory for sandwich beam behaviour with transversely flexible core. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 118(5), 1026–1043.
Frostig, Y., & Baruch, M. (1996). Localized loads effects in high-order bending of sandwich panels with flexible core. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122(11), 1069–1076.
Nemat-Naseer, S., Kang, W., McGee, J., Guo, W., & Issacs, J. (2007). Experimental investigation of energy absorption characteristics of components of sandwich structures. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 34(6), 1119–1146.
Phan, C. N., Frostig, Y., & Kardomateas, G. A. (2012). Analysis of sandwich beams with a compliant core and with in-plane rigidity-extended high-order sandwich panel theory versus elasticity. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 79, 041001/1–041001/11.
Phan, C. N., Bailey, N. W., Kardomateas, G. A., & Battley, M. A. (2012). Wrinkling of sandwich wide panels/beams based on the extended high-order sandwich panel theory: Formulation, comparison with elasticity and experiments. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 82, 1585–1599.
Phan, C. N., Kardomateas, G. A., & Frostig, Y. (2013). Blast response of a sandwich beam/wide plate based on the extended high-order sandwich panel theory and comparison with elasticity. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 80, 061005/1–061005/11.
Oskooei, S., & Hansen, J. S. (2000). Higher-order finite element for sandwich plates. AIAA Journal, 38(3), 525–533.
Kudela, P., Krawczuk, M., & Ostachowicz, W. (2007). Wave propagation modelling in 1-d structures using spectral finite elements. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 300, 88–100.
Sprague, M. A., & Geers, T. L. (2008). Legendre spectral finite elements for structural dynamics analysis. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 24, 1953–1965.
Boyd, J. P. (2001). Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods. Mineola, Newyork: Dover Publications Inc.
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A., & Zang, T. A. (2007). Spectral methods evolution to complex geometries and applications to fluid dynamics. Springer.
Sprague, M. A., & Purkayastha, A. (2015). Legendre spectral finite elements for reissner-mindlin composite plates. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 105, 33–43.
Chakraborty, A., Mahapatra, D. R., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2002). Finite element analysis of free vibration and wave propagation in asymmetric composite beams with structural discontinuities. Composite Structures, 55, 23–36.
Costanzo, F. A. (2011). Underwater explosion phenomena and shock physics. In Structural dynamics (Vol. 3, pp. 917–938). Springer.
Swisdak, M. M. (1978). Explosion effects and properties-part ii: Explosion effects in water. Technical report, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, VA.
Hayman, B. (1995). Underwater explosion loading on foam-cored sandwich panels. Sandwich Construction, 3.
Makinen, K. (1999). The transverse response of sandwich panels to an underwater shock wave. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 13, 631–646.
Fleck, N. A., & Deshpande, V. S. (2004). The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 71, 386–401.
Librescu, L., Sang-Yong, O., & Hohe, J. (2006). Dynamic response of anisotropic sandwich flat panels to underwater and in-air explosions. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43(13), 3794–3816.
Kamocka, M. (2015). Analytical and experimental determination of fml stiffness and strength properties. Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, 19(2), 141–159.
Wu, H. F., Wu, L. L., Slagter, W. J., & Verolme, J. L. (1994). Use of rule of mixtures and metal volume fraction for mechanical property predictions of fibre-reinforced aluminium laminates. Journal of Materials Science, 29(17), 4583–4591.
Pozrikidis, C. (2005). Introduction to finite and spectral element methods using MATLAB. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
Reddy, J. N. (1997). Mechanics of laminated composite plates. CRC Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Office of Naval Research and specially Dr. Y.D.S. Rajapakse for their continuous support under grant no. N6209-14-1-N139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The matrices of Eqs. (7) and (8) are given as,
and the strain displacement matrix, \([B^{x}]\) in Eq. (11) is given as
where
where, [0] is the matrix with zeros of size subscripted by the given dimension, [I] is the identity matrix of size subscripted by the given dimension, \(N_{1}, N_{2}, \ldots , N_{8}\) are the Lagrange interpolation functions of 7th degree in \(\zeta \) and can be found in standard text on FEM/SEMÂ [26].
The stiffness matrix \(C^x\) is given as
and
where superscript “x” represents “t”, “b”, or “c” indicating top face sheet, bottom face sheet and core respectively. \(N_{x}\) indicates the number of layers in the considered face sheet or the core and \([\bar{Q}_{ij}]\), is the transformed stiffness matrix of the layer “k” and is given in [27].
The inertia matrix, \([R^{x}]\) in Eq. (11) is given as
where
and
where,
The superscript “x” represents “t”, “b”, or “c” indicating top face sheet, bottom face sheet and \(N_{x}\) indicates the number of layers in the considered face sheet or core and \(\rho _{k}\) the density of the layer “k”.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raja Sekhar, B., Gopalakrishnan, S. (2018). Sandwich Structures Subjected to UNDEX Loading. In: Gopalakrishnan, S., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Blast Mitigation Strategies in Marine Composite and Sandwich Structures. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7170-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7170-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7169-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7170-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)