Skip to main content

Blast Mitigation Effects of Foam-Core, Composite Sandwich Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Structural polymer foams have been used as core material in lightweight sandwich panels for quite some time. Traditional sandwich theory suggests that the primary function of the polymer core is to transmit shear to the thin facesheets, thereby rendering high bending stiffness and strength from a panel with a minimum weight penalty. Recent analysis of the underwater blast response of PVC foam composite sandwich panel, however, shows that in addition to the above, PVC foams have blast mitigation effects through energy absorption via plastic core crushing. Close examination of the core stresses involved during initial yield has revealed that three-dimensional core plasticity is encountered in water blasts, and plastic work dissipation of the core plays a greater role in blast mitigation. In air blast/air back cases, core yielding is primarily transverse shear, but in water blast/air back and water blast/water back cases, core yielding is due to combined transverse shear, transverse compression and/or hydrostatic pressure. Experiments have been conducted to obtain the hysteresis effects of PVC H100 subjected to combined transverse shear and compression. These have led to the development of a transversely isotropic, viscoelastic–plastic damage material model that can be adequately used to describe the behavior of foam operating in this environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Underwater explosion research: A compendium of British and American reports (Vols. 1–3). Office of Naval Research: Washington DC, (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lyson, J. D. (1979). The underwater explosion response of a GRP mine countermeasures vessel. Journal of Naval Science, 5(3), 182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, D. J. (1989). Examination of the effects of underwater blasts on sandwich composite structures. Composite Structures, 11, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porfiri, M., Gupta, N. (2010). A review of research on impulsive loading of marine composites. In: Gdoutos, E. E., Daniel, I. M., Rajapakse, Y. D. S. (Eds.), Major accomplishments in composite materials and sandwich structures—an anthology of ONR sponsored research (pp. 169–194). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoo Fatt, M. S., & Sirivolu, D. (2015). Blast response of double curvature, composite sandwich shallow shells. Engineering Structures, 100, 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoo Fatt, M. S., Gao, Y., & Sirivolu, D. (2013). Foam-core, curved composite sandwich panels under blast. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 15, 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoo Fatt, M. S., Sirivolu, D. (2015). Blast mitigation effects of foam-core, composite sandwich structures. Indo-USA workshop on recent advances in blast mitigation strategies in civil and marine structures. Bangalore, India, August 16–19, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoo Fatt, M. S., Sirivolu, D. (2017). Marine composite sandwich plates under air and water blasts. Marine Structures (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, G. I. (1941). The pressure and impulse of submarine explosion waves on plates. Scientific papers of G. I. Taylor III (pp. 297–303). Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kambouchev, N., Noels, L., & Radovitzky, R. (2007). Numerical simulation of the fluid-structure interaction between air blast waves and free-standing plates. Computers and Structures, 8, 923–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sirivolu, D. (2016). Marine composite panels under blast loading. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Akron. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ACCESSION_NUM:akron1467993101.

  12. Deshpande, V. S., & Fleck, N. A. (2001). Multi-axial yield behavior of polymer foams. Acta Materialia, 49, 185–186.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gdoutos, E. E., Daniels, I. M., Wang, K. –A. (2002). Failure of cellular foams under multiaxial loading. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oller, S., Car, E., & Lubliner, J. (2003). Definition of a general implicit orthotropic yield criterion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192, 895–912.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, L., & Hoo Fatt, M. S. (2013). Transversely isotropic mechanical properties of PVC foam under cyclic loading. Journal of Materials Science, 48(19), 6786–6796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from Dr. Yapa Rajapakse at the Office of Naval Research under Grant N00014-11-1-0485.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle S. Hoo Fatt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoo Fatt, M.S., Alkhtany, M., Sirivolu, D. (2018). Blast Mitigation Effects of Foam-Core, Composite Sandwich Structures. In: Gopalakrishnan, S., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Blast Mitigation Strategies in Marine Composite and Sandwich Structures. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7170-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7170-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7169-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7170-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics