Abstract
This chapter presents a heuristic of four principles for researchers, designers or school communities to use to facilitate collaborative engagement about school space. It first explains how each idea is derived from the literature and previous research. Then a practical example of the process in an English primary school is reported. Finally, a discussion reviews the four principles in light of this example and briefly considers how they might relate to established conceptualisations of participation and collaborative decision-making. The discussion includes a consideration of the material , social and empirical evidence that can be used to support collaborative decision-making processes. The principles are based on research and experiences specific to learning environments, but the practices we have developed also relate to recent advances in research methodology, specifically the use of visual methods . It highlights how multiple methods, including various visual and spatial activities, can be used to facilitate participation and bring to light experiences and ideas that might otherwise be overlooked. These raise awareness of the school’s space, building a collective understanding of existing experience and possibilities for the future. A key to this process is the recognition that school is more than a building, where social, physical and organisational aspects interact. A second key understanding is that while the change in education is indeed challenging, it is clear that engaging with school space can help users make changes that align educational aims and practices with physical and organisational structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 5(4), 216–224.
Bennett, N., Andreae, J., Hegarty, P., & Wade, B. (1980). Open plan schools. Windsor, UK: Schools Council Publishing/NFER.
Bland, D. (2015). Children’s imaginations at the centre of design for education. In P. Woolner (Ed.), School design together (pp. 153–166). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2003). The school I’d like. RoutledgeFalmer: London, UK.
Burke, C., & Könings, K. D. (2016). Recovering lost histories of educational design: A case study in contemporary participatory strategies. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 721–732.
Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Cloonan, A, Dixon, M., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., et al. (2010). Innovative learning environments research study. Report. https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/365196/innovative-learning-spaces-final-report.pdf. Accessed September 29, 16.
Bragg, S., & Buckingham, D. (2008). ‘Scrapbooks’ as a resource in media research with young people. In P. Thomson (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 114–131). London, UK: Routledge.
Clark, J., Laing, K., Tiplady, L., & Woolner, P. (2013). Making connections: Theory and practice of using visual methods to aid participation in research. Resource document. Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, Newcastle University. http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/pub_details2.aspx?pub_id=190964.
Crook, C., & Mitchell, G. (2012). Ambience in social learning: Student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 121–139.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Darbyshire, P., Macdougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4), 417–436.
Durán-Narucki, V. (2008). School building condition, school attendance, and academic achievement in New York City public schools: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 278–286.
Gislason, N. (2009). Mapping school design: A qualitative study of the relations among facilities design, curriculum delivery, and school climate. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(4), 17–34.
Gislason, N. (2010). Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. Learning Environments Research, 13, 127–145.
Gislason, N. (2015). The open plan high school: Educational motivations and challenges. In P. Woolner (Ed.), School design together (pp. 101–120). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Hargreaves, A. (2002). Sustainability of educational change: The role of social geographies. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 189–214.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2008). Association between physical environment of secondary schools and student problem behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 455–486.
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942.
Maxwell, L. (2016). School building condition, social climate, student attendance and academic achievement: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 206–16.
Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575–595.
Niemi, R., Kumpulainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Hilppö, J. (2014). Pupils’ perspectives on the lived pedagogy of the classroom. Education 3–13, 43(6), 683–699.
Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2016). Creative interactions with data: using visual and metaphorical devices in repeated focus groups. Qualitative Research, 16(1), 9–26.
Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12, 1–23.
Priestley, M., Millera, K., Barrett, L., & Wallace, C. (2011). Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: The Highland experience. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 265–284.
Piper, H., & Frankham, J. (2007). Seeing voices and hearing pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 373–387.
Richard, V. M., & Lahman, M. K. E. (2015). Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 3–22.
Rivlin, L. G., & Rothenberg, M. (1976). The use of space in open classrooms. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings. New York, NY, USA: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.
Saint, A. (1987). Towards a social architecture. Avon, UK: Bath Press.
Sutherland, R., Sutherland, J., Fellner, C., Siccolo, M., & Clark, L. (2014). Schools for the future: Subtle shift or seismic change? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 19–37.
Thomson, P. (2007). Whole school change: A review of the literature. London, UK: Arts Council England.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The ‘grammar’ of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453–479.
Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & De Vere Wolsey, T. (2009). The walls still speak: The stories occupants tell. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 400–426.
Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, 21–32.
Woolner, P., & Clark, A. (2015). Developing shared understandings of learning environments: Interactions with students, teachers and other professionals. In P. Woolner (Ed.), School Design Together (pp. 167–183). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Woolner, P., Clark, J., Laing, K., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2014). A school tries to change: How leaders and teachers understand changes to space and practices in a UK secondary school. Improving Schools, 17(2), 148–162.
Woolner, P., Clark, J., Laing, K., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2012a). Changing spaces: Preparing students and teachers for a new learning environment. Children, Youth and Environments, Special Issue: Reconceptualising School Design: Child and Youth Environments for Learning, 22(1), 52–74.
Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012b). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60.
Woolner, P., Hall, E., Clark, J., Tiplady, L., Thomas, U., & Wall, K. (2010). Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: Using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 1–22.
Woolner, P., & Tiplady, L. (2016). Adapting school premises as part of a complex pedagogical change programme. In: U. Stadler-Altmann (Ed.) (English) Learning environment. educational and architectual views on schoolbuildings and classrooms. (German) Lernumgebungen. Erziehungswissenschaftliche und architekturkritische Perspektiven auf Schulgebäude und Klassenzimmer (pp. 69–81). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education., 45(1), 11–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolner, P. (2018). Collaborative Re-design: Working with School Communities to Understand and Improve Their Learning Environments. In: Ellis, R., Goodyear, P. (eds) Spaces of Teaching and Learning. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7154-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7155-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)