Abstract
First-year university students in an engineering course experienced activities which required them to engage in learning back and forth across physical and virtual learning space. The lecturer had designed a campus-based course with a significant online component involving activities for preparing the class, for use during class and for reflecting on classes afterward. Despite being required to engage deeply, not all students experienced the blended learning activities in the same way. While some reported deep approaches to the experience, perceived the in-class and online experiences as an integrated whole and collaborated in appropriate ways, others reported surface approaches, fragmented conceptions and collaboration patterns which did not support their learning outcomes . Combining research methodologies from student approaches to learning research and social network analysis , this study reveals qualitative variation in the learning experience which is logically related to academic achievement. The results offer implications for effective teaching in blended environments and ideas for how virtual learning space should be designed in order to be integrated effectively into course design .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating network. ICWSM, 8, 361–362.
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Bliuc, A., Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2010). Learning through face to face and online discussions: Associations between students’ conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 512–524.
Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
Chan, Y. K. (2014). Learning approaches and academic achievement in full-time and part-time sub-degree Hong Kong Chinese students. International Journal of Continuing Education & Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 75–86.
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88–108.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331–345.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). University mathematics students’ conception of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 87–94.
Cross, R., Parker, A., & Borgatti, S. P. (2002). A bird’s-eye view: Using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing. Somers, NY, USA: IBM Corporation.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87–103.
Ellis, R. A., Bliuc, A.-M., & Goodyear, P. (2012). Student experiences of engaged enquiry in pharmacy education: Digital natives or something else? Higher Education, 64(5), 609–626.
Ellis, R. A., & Calvo, R. A. (2004). Learning through discussions in blended environments. Educational Media International, 40, 263–274.
Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Student experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing”: Socio-material approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 104–116.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: An introduction to Actor Network Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (1999). Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment: Are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction, 9, 1–18.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
Miettinen, R., Lehenkari, J., & Tuunainen, J. (2008). Learning and network collaboration in product development: How things work for human use. Management Learning, 39(2), 203–219.
O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., … Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 10–21.
Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 363–378.
Trigwell, K., Ellis, R. A., & Han, F. (2012). Relations between students’ approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 811–824.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1494–1503.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council through grant DP150104163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellis, R.A., Han, F., Pardo, A. (2018). Measuring Engagement in the University Student Experience of Learning in Blended Environments. In: Ellis, R., Goodyear, P. (eds) Spaces of Teaching and Learning. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7154-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7155-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)