Abstract
The chapter draws together all previous chapters to answer the research questions and also elucidate the implications and plausibility of Interactionist Role Theory as a framework to give a holistic picture of state interactions by explaining the nexus between specific role conflicts and state’s foreign policy shifts and the mutual influence between the member states’ foreign policy actions and the overall relationship among the concerned states—social structure of the SPT. I finally explore areas for constructive collaboration that would promote peace and benefits for all concerned states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“North Korea – Denuclearization Action Plan,” Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy, (13 February 2007).
- 2.
All the Internet links were accessed on 28 April 2015 to confirm the availability.
References
All the Internet links were accessed on 28 April 2015 to confirm the availability.
Chinoy, Mike (2011) Six Party Talks: The Least Bad Alternative. 38 North. Available at: http://38north.org/2011/02/six-party-talks/.
Friedman, George (2013) The U.S.-Iran Talks: Ideology and Necessity. Stratfor. Geopolitical Weekly (12 November 2013). Available at: https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/us-iran-talks-ideology-and-necessity.
Harnisch, Sebastian (2012) Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning. Foreign Policy Analysis, No. 8, pp. 47–69.
Kaufman, Alison and Tamara Hemphill (2014) PRC Foreign Policy Under Xi Jinping: An Initial Assessment. CNA. Available at: https://www.cna.org/research/2014/prc-foreign-policy-under-xi-jinping.
Levy, Jack S. (2013) Psychology and Foreign Policy Decision-Making. In: Huddy, Leonie et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. (1994/95) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 5–49.
Perkovich, George (2015) Why the Iran Nuclear Deal Is Not the North Korea Deal. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/2015/04/28/why-iran-nuclear-deal-is-not-north-korea-deal/i7wa.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2013) Contemporary Sociology Theory. USA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hur, My. (2018). Conclusion. In: The Six-Party Talks on North Korea. Palgrave, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7113-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7113-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7112-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7113-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)