The Taijitu, Western Dialectics and Brain Hemisphere Function: A Dialogue Facilitated by the Scholarship of Complex Integration

  • Gary P. Hampson
Chapter

Abstract

Using as central reference point a complex evolutionary interpretation of the East Asian Taijitu (associated with yin-yang theory), this chapter leans toward a kaleidoscopic dialogue involving: Western dialectics (as exemplified through Bhaskar’s dialectical critical realism and philosophy of meta-Reality); brain hemisphere function (via McGilchrist’s work critically exploring the globally significant under-regard of the right hemisphere and its relationship to dominant culture); the philosophy of quantum physics; Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, Winton’s pattern dynamics; critical social theory; and an ecosystem of postformal developmental psychological modalities. Enhancements are effected both toward Boyer’s scholarship of integration—by the utilisation of postformal reasoning to propose a scholarship of complex integration—and toward such notions as dialogue and pertinence. With radical implications for global academia and formal Western contexts of thought regarding the critical underuse of such semiotic patterns as the Taijitu, this chapter aspires to the betterment of humanity and the world.

References

  1. Alexander, E. (2012). Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s journey into the Afterlife. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beatty, I., & Torbert, W. R. (2013). Yin and Yang: The relationship of leisure and work. In T. Blackshaw (Ed.) Routledge Handbook of Leisure Studies, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M. M., & Bell, M. (2008). An invitation to environmental sociology. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Bhaskar (2008). Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bock-Mobius, I. (2012). Qigong Meets Quantum Physics: Experiencing Cosmic Oneness. St Petersburg, FL: Three Pines Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brons, L. L. (2009). Concepts in Theoretical Thought: an Introductory Essay. In CARLS Series of Advanced Study of Logic and Sensibility, Volume 3. Tokyo, Japan: Keio University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, C. Y. C. (2009). Weighted Equation and Rules—A Novel Concept for Evaluating Protein-Ligand Interaction. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 27(3), 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi, K. S. (2013). Explorations of Zhou Dunyi’s Confucian Cosmology for an Ecological Promise. Religion Compass, 7(6), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danison, N. L. (2007). Backwards: Returning to our Source for Answers. Columbus, OH: A. P. Lee & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (1967/2001). Writing and Difference. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1919/2004). Reconstruction in Philosophy. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Dover.Google Scholar
  16. Di Corpo, U. and Vannini, A. (2012). Syntropy, the law of complementarity and unity. Syntropy 2–13 (1), 83–92Google Scholar
  17. Di Giovanni Monastra. (1996/2000). The Yin-Yang’ among the insignia of the Roman Empire? Sophia 6(2).Google Scholar
  18. Giri, A. K. (2002). The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity. Futures, 34(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gödel, K. (1931/1992). On formally undecidable propositions of Principa Mathematica and related systems. Mineloa, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, D. R. (2002). Introduction to SUNY Series in Constructive Postmodern Thought. In C. Keller & A. Daniell (Eds.), Process and Difference: Between Cosmological and Poststructuralist Postmodernisms. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Guattari, F. (1989/2000). The Three Ecologies. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Hampson, G. P. (2005). Human: Machine, ape or dolphin? Journal of Futures Studies 9(4), 29–44.Google Scholar
  23. Hampson, G. P. (2007). Integral re-views postmodernism: The way out is through. Integral Review 4, 108–173.Google Scholar
  24. Hampson, G. P. (2010). Facilitating eco-logical futures through postformal poetic. Ecosophy. Futures 42(10), 1064–1072.Google Scholar
  25. Hampson, G. P. (2012). Eco-logical education for the Long Emergency. Futures 44(1), 71–80.Google Scholar
  26. Hampson, G. P. (2013). Toward a genealogy and topology of Western integrative. Thinking. Integral Review 9(2), pp. 46–75.Google Scholar
  27. Hillson, D. (Ed.) (2011). The Failure Files: Perspectives on Failure. Triarchy Press Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  29. Jung, C. G. (1973). Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle (Vol. 8). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kantor, D. (2012). Reading the Room: Group Dynamics for Coaches and Leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1993). A tentative description of post-formal thinking: the critical confrontation with cognitive theory. Harvard Educational Review, 63(3), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lacan J. (1988). The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. McGilchrist, I. (2009). The Master and his Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven; CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Midgley, M. (1985). Evolution as a Religion. York, UK: Methuen & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mišić, N. (2011). Chinese concept of five phases (wu xing-五行) in the light of systems science. Symposium of Quantum-Informational Medicine: Acupuncture-based and Consciousness-based Holistic Approaches and Techniques, Belgrade, 23–25 Sept 2011.Google Scholar
  36. Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In C. Gershenson, D. Aerts & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  37. Norrie, A. (2010) Dialectic and Difference: Dialectical Critical Realism and the Grounds of Justice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Robinet, I. (1992/1997). Taoism: Growth of a Religion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schöter, A. (2011). The yijing: metaphysics and physics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 412–426.Google Scholar
  40. Sheldrake, R. (1987). A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Formative Causation. Los Angeles, Boston: J. P. Tarcher.Google Scholar
  41. Stalling, J. (2010). Poetics of Emptiness: Transformations of Asian Thought in American Poetry. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. von Stillfried, N. (2010). Theoretical and empirical explorations of Generalized Quantum Theory. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany.Google Scholar
  43. von Stillfried, N., & Walach, H. (2006). The whole and its parts: are complementarity and non-locality intrinsic to closed systems. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 17, 137–146.Google Scholar
  44. Walach, H., & von Stillfried, N. (2011). Generalised Quantum Theory—Basic idea and general intuition: A background story and overview. Axiomathes, 21(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walls, J. W. (1995). The I Ching as a paradigm for understanding corresponding states in fundamentally different systems. Advances in human factors/ergonomics 20: 1047–1052.Google Scholar
  46. Wang, R. (2005). Zhou Dunyi’s diagram of the Supreme Ultimate explained (Taijitu shuo): A construction of the Confucian metaphysics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66(3), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Winton, T. (n.d.). Pattern Dynamics: a planetary social enterprise. http://www.patterndynamics.com.au. Accessed 2013/09/18.
  48. Yoke, H. P. (2000). Li, Qi, and Shu: An Introduction to Science and Civilization in China. DoverPublications.com.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary P. Hampson
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarGlastonburyUK

Personalised recommendations