Skip to main content

The Development of Think Tanks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Social Systems Engineering
  • 895 Accesses

Abstract

Development of the global society has entered into a new millennium, although the material wellbeing of most of the global people has been improved through progress of science and technology, improvement of economic system and also improvement of social side in certain system aspects. But the growth of these systems are very much unbalanced. Although U.S.A. ranked number one on its economy and capacity of science and technology, but there are series divide between the blue collar class and the white collar class. China, although ranked number two in the global economy and number one of its manufacturing capacity, but there are no shortage of social issues in health care, education, housing and bottom line of morality. Officials of governments globally are generally occupied in busy routine and urgent short term works, they have no spare time to think about long term issue. And also due to the specialization of discipline, every department concerns development of its own without coordination with other department or no consideration of secondary or negative effect of certain development. And also, due to their position of administration, they have vested interests to pursue short term results. The emergence of modern think tanks concentrated with experts of various disciplines, if they are not funded by government or business sectors, they can perform relatively better results of issues faced by the country or global society. But how such kind of think tanks can be existed is an issue to be explored. This chapter will give a brief discussion of role of think tanks, type of think tanks, its process of development etc. Relative detail case studies are given to several selective thanks with description of their organizations, histories, work on education and training, programmes etc. The authors of the book expect that these materials may be helpful to assist most of the developing countries to have the information how to establish a think tank. The authors suggest that if a think tank is well established with researchers known the real world politics, the think tanks can perform the role of national or other types of planning, while the planning organization of the government is responsible for implementation, coordination, monitoring feedback information in time and making corrective actions, the think tank is a consultative organization, while the governmental planning organization has administrative power in sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note: Most of this chapter were completed in 2012; therefore, the referenced statistics are only for illustration of problems and situations.

  2. 2.

    Note: Three Kingdoms, i.e. Wei, Shu and Wu, existed in history of China during 220–280 A.D., which is called the Three Kingdoms Period. Cao Cao, the creator and King of Wei, had been an official of the Eastern Han Dynasty. He fought with Yuan Shao, a noble in Eastern Han Dynasty at Guandu. Yuan Shao dispatched 700,000 forces and Cao Cao only had 70,000 soldiers. Cao Cao adopted advices given by Xun You, Xun Yu, etc., but Yuan Shao turned down the good advices of Tian Feng and Xun You and even made Xun You surrender himself and his advisory to Cao Cao. Yuan Shao lost the battle in the end. This was later known as the Battle of Guandu.

  3. 3.

    Note: NIRA (1985, p. 224).

  4. 4.

    Note: Introduction to Soft Science Research in China was published in Soft Science Research and Decision Making prepared by the Science and Technology Policy Bureau under the State Scientific and Technological Commission and the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Department under People’s Daily in 1986.

  5. 5.

    Source: McGann and Sabatini (2011).

  6. 6.

    Note: The case of Brookings Institution is briefing of its various annual report from 1985 to 2010. 1985 is a printed Version Glodberg (1985). Remaining are derived from Brooking Website.

  7. 7.

    Note: This book was translated into Chinese in November 1993 by the UNDP “economic development, reform and policy” research group of the Development Research Center of the State Council with approval of the Institution and was named as Macroeconomic Decision OrientationMemorandum to the President and published by Shanghai Far East Publishers in 1994.

  8. 8.

    Note: The original text is “Programme” which has a literal meaning of planning or scheme; however, it actually means research department here.

  9. 9.

    Case study of Rand Corporation is also based on various annual reports of Rand Corporation.

  10. 10.

    Source: Rand Corporation (2014).

  11. 11.

    Note: James A. Thomson was a physicist before and worked for White House and Defense Department in affairs such as national defense and arms control. From 1989–2011, he acted as the fourth President and CEO of RAND Corporation.

  12. 12.

    Note: Charles Wolf, Jr. is present international economy chairman and senior economic adviser of Rand. He was also dean of Pardee graduate school of Rand during 1970–1997. He held a policy tutorial class in Tianjin, China invited by Institute of Industrial Economics of CASS in September, 1982.

  13. 13.

    Source: Wolf, Hildebrandt, Kennedy, Henry, and Terasawa (1989).

  14. 14.

    Source: Case study of International Development Center of Japan is written based upon various years of “IDCJ Report”.

  15. 15.

    Note: The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology in Japan established a committee in 1994 for studying the future policy research and education in Japan, and in 1997, the Postgraduate Institute of National Policies of Japan was founded.

  16. 16.

    Source: International Development Center of Japan (2010).

  17. 17.

    Source: IDCJ Report 2010 its 60 projects, involving approximate 30 countries in Asia, Africa and South America.

  18. 18.

    Note: Syndication refers to alliance and combination of enterprises.

  19. 19.

    Source: African Economic Research Consortium (1997–1981) Annual Report. African Economic Research Consortium (2012) Annual Report.

  20. 20.

    Note: African Capacity-Building Foundation (ACBF) was founded in 1991 by African governments, African Development Bank, United National Development Programme, the World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. Its member countries include 42 African countries and a few non-African countries.

  21. 21.

    Source: Scientific and Technological Policy Department, State Scientific and Technological Commission, compiled by the Education, Science and Culture Department of People’s Daily (1986).

  22. 22.

    Note: The 7th ranking report (2013) has been published.

References

  • African Economic Research Consortium. (1997/1998, 2011/2012). AERC Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.aercafrica.org/index.php/about-aerc/annual-reports.

  • Glodberg (Ed.) (1985). The Brooking Institute Annual Report 1985. Washington, D.C.: Walk Press Ina.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Center for Economic Growth (Ed.) (2010). Brochure. San Francisco: ICEG.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Development Center of Japan. (2010). IDCJ Report 2010 (p. 3). Tokyo: IDCJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Development Center of Japan Annual Report (1991–1992). Annual Report 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. G. (2010). Global go to think tanks index report. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks.

  • McGann, J. G. (2012). Global go to think tanks index report 2011, pp. 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. G., & Sabatini, R. (2011). Global think tanks: Policy networks and governance. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIRA. (1985). Trend of policy research in North America Europe and Japan (1982–1983) (Japanese version). Tokyo: National Institute of Research Advancement.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Secretary-General’s report to ministers 2014. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/.

  • Rand Corporation. (2014). 2013 RAND annual report. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP1-2013.html.

  • Scientific and Technological Policy Department of State Scientific and Technological Commission, & The Education, Science and Culture Department of People’s Daily. (1986). Rise of soft sciences. Beijing: People’s Daily Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C., Jr., Hildebrandt, G., Kennedy, M., Henry, D. P., & Terasawa, K. (1989). Long-Term Economic and Military Trends, 1950-2010. California: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huijiong Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, H., Li, S. (2018). The Development of Think Tanks. In: Introduction to Social Systems Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7040-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics