Skip to main content

Creating a Gendered-Racialized Care Labor Market: Migrant Labor Policy and the Transformation of Care Work in Taiwan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Care and Migration in East Asia

Part of the book series: Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies ((Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies))

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates that a gender ideology that associates care with women within and beyond the family context shapes Taiwan’s migrant care labor policy and sustains the gendered-racialized labor market of care work in a transnational context. First, the chapter introduces migrant care labor policy in Taiwan and the relevant regulations of employing migrant live-in care workers. Second, it illustrates the daily techniques that Taiwanese employers use to stratify relations between them and migrant live-in care workers. Third, it describes the lived experiences of Taiwanese women to explain their “triple shifts”—from wage-earning work to household chores (including childcare) to elderly care. The employment of migrant live-in care workers does not challenge the gender division of care labor. Instead, it shifts daily care practices from one group of women to another. This chapter concludes with a discussion of the inequalities between women of different social classes and ethnicities to highlight the withdrawal of the nation state from organizing and providing public care and the consequences of this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This number does not include 13,696 institutional care workers and 2028 domestic workers.

  2. 2.

    Including long-term care institutes, nursing facilities, and veterans homes.

  3. 3.

    The government changed its migrant labor policy in 2017. Now, migrant workers are not mandated to leave Taiwan in the end of their third year of employment. They can continue the employment up to 12 years for those working in industry and up to 14 years for those working as live-in care workers.

References

  • Abel, E. 2002. “American Women Tending Sick and Disabled Children, 1850–1940.” In Child Care and Inequality: Rethinking Carework for Children and Youth, edited by F.M. Cancian, D. Kurz, A.S. London, R. Reviere, and M.C. Tuominen, 11–21. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, F., and S. Oliker. 2000. Caring and Gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. 2011. “Management or Exploitation? The Survival Strategy of Employer of Family Foreign Care Workers.” Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies 85: 89–155. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C.B. 1997. “Walls of Silence and Late Twentieth Century Representations of the Foreign Female Domestic Worker: the Case of Filipina and Indonesian Female Servants in Malaysia.” International Migration Review 31 (2): 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C.B. 1998. Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian “Modernity” Project. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2 nd Edition). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, T. 1992. Making Gray Gold: Narratives of Nursing Home Care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doress-Worters, P.B. 1994. “Adding Elder Care to Women’s Multiple Roles: A Critical Review of the Caregiver Stress and Multiple Roles Literatures.” Sex Roles 31 (9–10), 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Mignon. 2005. “Reproducing Labor Inequalities: Challenges for Feminists Conceptualizing Care at the Intersections of Gender, Race, and Class.” Gender & Society 19 (1): 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., and N. Folbre. 1999. “The Cost of Caring.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 56(1): 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England, P., M. Budig, and N. Folbre. 2002. “Wages of Virtue: The Relative Pay of Care Work.” Social Problems 49(4): 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, E.N. 1992. “From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor.” Signs 18 (1): 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, O. 2014. “Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, R. 1993. “Women’s Lives/Feminist Knowledge: Feminist Standpoint as Ideology Critique.” Hypatia 8(1): 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 2007. Domestica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A.R. 2000. “Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value.” In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, edited by W. Hutton and A. Giddens, 130–146. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.H. 1995. Three-Generation Extended Family: Myths and Piffalls. Taipei: Chuliu Publisher. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, P.C. 2006. Global Cinderellas: Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, P.C. 2016. “Deferential Surrogates and Professional Others: Recruitment and Training of Migrant Care Workers in Taiwan and Japan.” Positions 24 (1): 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L.F. 2013. “State and Medicalization of Care Needs: Migrant Care Labor Policy in Taiwan.” Journal of Intimacy and Public Sphere 2 (1): 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L.F. 2018. “Migrant Live-in Care Workers in Taiwan: Multiple Roles, Cultural Functions, and the New Division of Care Labour.” In The Routledge Handbook of Social Care Work. edited by K. Christensen, and D. Pilling, 228–240. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindio-McGovern, L. 2003. “Labor Export in the Context of Globalization: the Experience of Filipino Domestic Workers in Rome.” International Sociology 18 (3): 513–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.T. 1998. Women and Medical Sociology. Taipei: Fembooks Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2014. Report of Senior Citizen Condition Survey 2013. Taipei: Ministry of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health and Welfare Policy. 2017. “Statistics of Long-Term Care.” Retrieved from: http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-3550-113-xCat-T03.html

  • Ministry of Labor. 2016. “Foreign Workers Statistics.” Retrieved from: http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/mon/c12010.htm

  • Mohanty, C.T. 1997. “Women Workers and Capitalist Scripts: Ideologies of Domination, Common Interests, and the Politics of Solidarity.” In Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Future, edited by A. Jacqui and C.T. Mohanty, 3–29. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development Council. 2016. “Population Project for Taiwan: 2016–2060.” Retrieved from: http://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=2E5DCB04C64512CC

  • Remero, M. 1992. Maid in the U.S.A. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. 1987. Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Women Factory Workers in Malaysia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, R.S. 2001. Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration and Domestic Work. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, N. 2006. “Gendering the Politics of Migration.” International Migration Review 40(1): 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen-Koob, S. 1991. The Global City: New York, Tokyo and London. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvey, R. 2004. “Transnational Domestication: State Power and Indonesian Migrant Women in Saudi Arabia.” Political Geography 23 (3): 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. 2010. “The Globalization of Care in Taiwan: From Undutiful Daughter-in-law to Cold-blooded Migrant Killer.” In Transnationale Sorgearbeit, edited by K. Scheiwe and J. Krawietz, 309–328. Springer: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.C. 2005. “Population Aging and Long-term Care Policy.” National Policy Quarterly 4 (4): 5–24. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. 2004a. “A Dialogue with ‘Global Care Chain’ Analysis: Nurse Migration in the Irish Context.” Feminist Review 77: 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. 2004b. “Critical Reflections and Lines of Enquiry.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 6(3): 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, H.J., and R.J. Montgomery. 2003. “Gender and Elder Care in China: the Influence of Filial Piety and Structural Constraints.” Gender & Society 17 (2): 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M.K., J.S. Litt, and C.E. Bose. 2006. “Globalization and Multiple Crises of Care.” In Global Dimensions of Gender and Carework, edited by M.K. Zimmerman, J.S. Litt, C.E. Bose, 9–29. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liang, LF. (2018). Creating a Gendered-Racialized Care Labor Market: Migrant Labor Policy and the Transformation of Care Work in Taiwan. In: Ogawa, R., Chan, R., Oishi, A., Wang, LR. (eds) Gender, Care and Migration in East Asia. Series in Asian Labor and Welfare Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7025-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7025-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7024-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7025-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics