Advertisement

The Relation Between Right to Claim for Tort and Right to Claim for Restitution of Unjust Enrichment

  • Xinbao Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

The basis for scientific and reasonable legislation is definitely the maturity of theoretical research. Civil law is law of rights, and the civil law system is in fact a system of rights. In order to realize rights or to maintain the fulfillment of rights, “each right possesses or may extend certain right of claim”.

References

  1. Bonfante P (1992) Istituzioni di dritto Roman (trans: Feng H). China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 398–399Google Scholar
  2. Cui JY (1992) On unjust enrichment. Chinese J Law 4Google Scholar
  3. Christian Von Bar (2001) The common European law of torts, vol II (trans: Jiao MH). The Law Press, p 11Google Scholar
  4. Christian Von Bar, Clive E, Schulte-Nöcke H (eds) (2008) Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law: draft common frame of reference (DCFR) interim outline edition. European Law Publishers GmbH, p 326Google Scholar
  5. Hong XJ (2003) On the inappropriate benefit obtaining as a result of invading other’s rights: review on the choice between the right of redemption requirement and that of requirement for returning the inappropriate benefits. J China Youth Coll Political Sci 2Google Scholar
  6. Larenz K (2003) General principles of German civil law, vol I. (trans: Wang XY et al.). The Law Press, p 349Google Scholar
  7. Markesinis BS, Lorenz W, Dannemann G (1997) The German law of obligations, vol. I. Clarendon, Oxford, p 752Google Scholar
  8. Mu SQ (ed) (1987) Interpretation of the general principles of civil law. The Law Press, p 111Google Scholar
  9. Schwab D (2006) An introduction to the Civil law. (trans: Zheng C). The Law Press, p 287Google Scholar
  10. Shi SK (2000) On the law of obligations. China University of Political Science and Law, pp 227–228Google Scholar
  11. Sun SY (1985) On the law of obligations in Civil law system, vol. I. Self-published, Taipei, p 177Google Scholar
  12. Wang ZJ (2001) Legal thinking and case study., China University of Political Science and Law, pp 63–64Google Scholar
  13. Wang ZJ (ed) (2002a) Theories of law of obligations (II): unjust enrichment. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 7Google Scholar
  14. Wang LM (2002b) On the law of contract (I). China Renmin University Press, p 69Google Scholar
  15. Wang ZJ (2003a) The structural analysis on the relations between obligations. In: Wang ZJ (ed) Civil law theories and case study, vol IV. China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 96–97Google Scholar
  16. Wang ZJ (ed) (2003b) Selling others’ property and non-authorized disposal. In: Civil law theories and case study, vol. IV. China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 96–97Google Scholar
  17. Wang LM (2004) On the law of Torts vol. I. China Renmin University Press, p 680Google Scholar
  18. Yang LX (2005) On Tort law, vol. II. The People’s Court Press, pp 233–234Google Scholar
  19. Wang Y (2006) The legislative selection on the protection system for property rights: reviews on chapter three of property right law draft. Peking Univ Law J 1Google Scholar
  20. Zheng YB, Chen RL (2003) The pandect on the law of obligations in civil law system. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renmin University of China Law School, China Legal Science Journals PressBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations