Skip to main content

On Burden of Proof in Medical Negligence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 427 Accesses

Abstract

Where there exists a medical contract between the patient and the doctor, if the doctor’s negligence leads to personal harms to the patient, the doctor’s behavior constitutes the non-performance of obligations due to his failure of proper fulfillment of contractual obligations and his negligence also constitutes the infringement on the patient’s personal rights including the right to life, right to body, and right to health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Christian Von Bar (2001).

  2. 2.

    Article 2 of the Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents provides that “The term ‘medical accident’ as mentioned in the present Regulation shall refer to those that have caused personal injury to the patients negligently by the medical institutions or the staff members thereof in the activities of medical treatment by violating the laws, regulations, ministerial rules concerning medical treatment and health or the standards or conventions of medical treatment and nursing”.

  3. 3.

    Xue (2003).

  4. 4.

    Jiang (1999).

  5. 5.

    Rosenberg (2002).

  6. 6.

    Zhang (2000).

  7. 7.

    Jiang (1999, 502–503).

  8. 8.

    Li (2003).

  9. 9.

    Wu (2002).

  10. 10.

    Jiang (1999, 504).

  11. 11.

    Id., 504–507.

  12. 12.

    Yin (2003).

  13. 13.

    Liu (1996).

  14. 14.

    Dingquan (2003).

  15. 15.

    Pan (2005).

  16. 16.

    Ding (1991).

  17. 17.

    Christie v. Callahan, 75 App. D. C. 133, 124 F. 2d 825 (1941).

  18. 18.

    Huang (1996).

  19. 19.

    Dingquan (2003, 513).

  20. 20.

    Chen (1996).

  21. 21.

    Gong (2001).

  22. 22.

    Shen (2001).

  23. 23.

    Dingquan (2003, 513–514).

  24. 24.

    Chen (1996, 104).

  25. 25.

    Gong (2001, 317–319).

  26. 26.

    Id., 306.

  27. 27.

    Article 426 of the Civil Procedural Law of Germany provides that: If the other party denies holding the evidence, the court then shall question the whereabouts of the document. The other party shall be informed to carefully find the whereabouts of the document on the notice. The rest issue shall be applied to the provisions of Article 449 and Article 550. If the court is convinced that the other party holds, the court shall order the other party to present the document.

  28. 28.

    Gong (2001, 310–314).

  29. 29.

    Shen (2001, 34–35).

  30. 30.

    Chen Zhongwu, On Burden of proof of Medical Malpractice in France, Report paper of at the Symposium on Comparative Study of Burden of Proof of Medical Negligence held at the National Taiwan University on December 24, 2005.

  31. 31.

    Yu (1998).

  32. 32.

    Qiu Congzhi. On constitutive elements of liabilities for danger-change of accountability principles of infringement, in the doctrine of civil liability fixation for medical disputes, at 105 (Master’s Dissertation of Taiwan Soochow University, 1996).

  33. 33.

    Zhu Baisong, On Burden of proof of Medical Malpractice in Japan, Report paper of at the Symposium on Comparative Study of Burden of Proof of Medical Negligence held at the National Taiwan University on December 24, 2005.

  34. 34.

    Cai (2005).

  35. 35.

    Tang (2002).

  36. 36.

    Li (2003, 181).

  37. 37.

    Xiao and Qiao (2001).

  38. 38.

    Article 23(2) and (3) of the Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents stipulates that: “The database of experts shall consist of medical professionals that satisfy the following conditions: (1) having good professional knowledge and being of excellent professional ethics; (2) being employed by a medical institution or institution of medical teaching or research and holding a senior professional title for three years or more; any legal medical expert who satisfies the conditions as provided in item (1) of the preceding paragraph and holds a senior professional title may be included in the database of experts.

  39. 39.

    Article 26 of the Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents stipulates that: “In any of the following circumstances, members of the groups of experts shall withdraw, and the parties concerned may plead their withdrawal in oral or written form: (1) being a party or a close relative of the party to the medical dispute; (2) having interests in the medical dispute; (3) having other relationship with the parties concerned that may affect the impartiality of authentication”.

  40. 40.

    Wang (2003).

  41. 41.

    Liang et al. (2004).

  42. 42.

    Wang et al. (2004).

References

  • Cai YW (2005) On fault. Doctoral Dissertation of China, Renmin University School of Law, p 99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen RZ (1996) Distribution of burden of proof. In: The doctrine of civil liability fixation for medical disputes, Master’s Dissertation of Taiwan Soochow University, pp 100–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Von Bar (2001) The common european law of torts, vol II (trans. Jiao MH). The Law Press, p 358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding ZY (1991) On proceedings of compensation for medical damages: with reasonable distribution of burden of proof as center. Master’s thesis of National Political University, pp 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong SH (2001) On legislation of compensation for medical damages. The Law Press, pp 296–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang TZ (1996) The doctrine of civil liability fixation for medical disputes. Master’s Dissertation of Taiwan Soochow University, pp 100–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunag DQ (2003) Medical law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W (1999) Legal principles of civil procedures. China Renmin University Press, p 494

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang HX et al. (2004) The proposal of civil code of china and reasons. The Law Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2003) On the civil burden of proof. The Law Press, pp 122–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YH (1996) On medical relationship and theory of filling up. Master’s Dissertation of Taiwan Soochow University, pp 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan WD (2005) Cases analysis of tort law in common law system. Higher Education Press, pp 121–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg L (2002) On burden of proof-based on the german civil code and the code of civil procedure (trans. Zhuang JH). China Legal Publishing House, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen GL (2001) The application of principle of arms equality to medical proceedings. Yuedan Legal J 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang DH (2002) Understanding and application of the management regulations on medical malpractice. China Social Sciences Press, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM (ed) (2003) The civil code on the tort liability law. People’s Court Press, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM et al. (2004) Scholar proposal of the civil code and legislative reasons. The Law Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HY, Wei XN (2002) Principles on proof in procedures. Law Press, pp 370–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao X, Qiao N (2001) On defensive medical treatment from perspective of conversion of burden of proof. Contemp Med Sci 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue B (2003) The compact english-chinese dictionary of Anglo-American law. The Law Press, p 888

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin F (2003) On Fault of tort liabilities in medical malpractice. In: Zhang XB (ed) Tort law review, People’s Court Press, pp 35–36)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M (1998) Tort law of Japan. The Law Press, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WP (2000) Procedural framework and program. Tsinghua University Press, pp 122–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinbao Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X. (2018). On Burden of Proof in Medical Negligence. In: Legislation of Tort Liability Law in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6961-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6961-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6960-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6961-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics