Skip to main content

Empirical Methodology and Findings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 562 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

This chapter investigates the impact of the regulatory stringency index constructed in Chap. 5 on patenting in Germany, Brazil, India, and China from 1985 to 2010. The index is based on an aggregation of all relevant environmental regulations that were adopted in these countries since 1985. The index (core explanatory variable) is a good measure of strictness of environmental policies and regulations because it relies on all (incremental) interventions, i.e., vehicular emissions, fuel consumption level, and the technological developments to meet these requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The latter was pointed by an interviewee.

  2. 2.

    The choice of lag lengths was based on interviews where I was told about the approximate time the industry expects the government to inform them, prior to announcing any new regulation.

  3. 3.

    In this regression framework, the panel variable is a unique country (4)–ipc (23) id which makes the total panel groups 92. The time variable has 24 years with year 2011 dropped because of missing information. The total observations are therefore 2208.

  4. 4.

    For details on count models, see Cameron and Trivedi (1998), Hausman et al. (1984), and Maddala (1983); for a comparative assessment see Allison and Waterman (2002).

  5. 5.

    The estimates are derived using Huber–White standard errors to control for heteroskedasticity for a shorter time period. Years 1985, 1986, and 2011 had to be dropped due to inconsistency.

References

  • Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of a patent. Economics Letters, 69, 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition, and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32, 1343–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to patents R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, H., & Klock, M. (1997). The Relation Between Patent Citations and Tobins Q in the Semiconductor Industry, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 9, 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citation and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 172187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Bharadwaj .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bharadwaj, A. (2018). Empirical Methodology and Findings. In: Environmental Regulations and Innovation in Advanced Automobile Technologies. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6952-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics