Skip to main content

Predicting Financial Statement Fraud with Fraud Diamond Model of Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence

Abstract

Fraud in corporations is a topic that has received significant and growing attention, not to mention that it is considered as a loophole in the financial statement fraud. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence about the detection of the financial statement fraud proxied with earnings management through revenue discretionary model (Stubben in Acc Rev 85(2): 695–717, 2010) accordance with fraud diamond by Wolfe and Hermanson ( CPA J, 1–5, 2004). The variables used were the factor of pressure proxied by financial stability, external pressure, personal financial need and financial targets, while the factor of opportunity was proxied by nature of the industry and ineffective monitoring, the factor of rationalization and the factor of capability. The samples used in this study were 86 manufacturing companies that were listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2012–2014. Secondary data were used in the form of financial reports of companies. Hypothesis testing was conducted using logistic linear regression with EViews software. The results showed that the variables such as pressure, opportunity, rationalization and capability simultaneously determine the financial statement fraud. Based on the partial test (Wald test), variable external pressure, financial target and capability partially could be used to predict the financial statement fraud, while other variables could not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agustia, D. (2013). Pengaruh faktor good corporate governance, free cash flow, dan leverage terhadap manajemen laba. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 15(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AICPA, SAS No. 99. (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. New York: AICPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. (1953). The internal auditor as fraud buster. Managerial Auditing Journal. MCB University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbegi, D. O., & Adebisi, J. F. (2013). The new fraud diamond model—how can it help forensic accountants in fraud investigation in Nigeria? Europan Journal of Accounting Auditing Fiancé Research, 1.1(4), 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Accounting Standard Board. (2009). International standard on auditing 240: The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements. Handbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y. I., & Wang, M. L. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business and Economic Research, 7(2), 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugraha, N. D. A., & Henny, D. (2015). Pendeteksian laporan keuangan melalui faktor risiko, tekanan dan peluang (berdasarkan press release OJK 2008–2012). E-Journal Akuntansi Trisakti, 2(1), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee, Z. (2002). Financial statement fraud: Prevention and detection. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, N. H., & Ahmar, N. (2014). Revenue discretionary model pengukuran manajemen laba: berdasarkan sektor industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 16(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sihombing, K. S. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2010–2012. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 03(02), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial stability: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, SSRN (Social Science Research Network), 13, 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubben, S. R. (2010). Discretionary revenues as a measure of earnings management. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 695–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbelman, M. F., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, W. S., & Albrecht, C. O. (2014). Akuntansi Forensik (4th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanda Trio Santoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santoso, N.T., Surenggono (2018). Predicting Financial Statement Fraud with Fraud Diamond Model of Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia. In: Said, R., Mohd Sidek, N., Azhar, Z., Anuar Kamarudin, K. (eds) State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6926-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics